Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/EJE-08-0292
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 160, Issue 2, 275-281
Copyright © 2009 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
EJE-08-0292v1
160/2/275    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, S.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, S.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, T.

CLINICAL STUDY

Clinical impact of two different intraoperative parathyroid hormone assays in primary and renal hyperparathyroidism

Sonja-Kerstin Meyer1, Markus Zorn2, Karin Frank-Raue3, Markus W Büchler1,4, Peter Nawroth2 and Theresia Weber1

1 Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany2 Department of Internal Medicine I and Clinical Chemistry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany3 Endokrinologische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Heidelberg, Germany4 Salem Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany

(Correspondence should be addressed to T Weber who is now at Department of Surgery I, University Hospital, Steinhoevelstrasse 9, 89075 Ulm, Germany; Email: theresia.weber{at}uniklinik-ulm.de)


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Declaration of interest
 References
 
Background: Intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) monitoring predicts successful surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT). In renal HPT, intraoperative PTH assays can define whether parathyroid resection is adequate.

Methods: Intraoperative PTH was measured with two different immunometric assays (Immulite Turbo DPC and ADVIA Centaur assay) in 91 patients undergoing parathyroidectomy for primary (n=57) and renal (n=34) hyperparathyroidism. PTH was monitored preoperatively, 10, 20, and 30 min after parathyroidectomy and 24 h postoperatively.

Results: Ten minutes after parathyroidectomy, intraoperative PTH dropped into the normal range (<7.6 pmol/l) in 84% of patients with pHPT and tertiary HPT as measured with the ADVIA Centaur assay (PTH-A), compared with 100% of the samples measured with the Immulite Turbo DPC assay (PTH-I; P=0.0082). Twenty minutes after parathyroidectomy for secondary HPT, intraoperative PTH decreased to the normal range in 100% measured with PTH-I compared with 50% measured with PTH-A (P=0.009). Then, 24 h postoperatively, PTH-I and PTH-A levels were within the normal range in all of the successfully treated patients. Both assays correctly identified six patients with persistent disease and another patient with a double adenoma in pHPT.

Conclusions: In patients undergoing parathyroidectomy for primary or renal HPT, PTH levels decreasing to the normal range indicated successful surgery in all of the patients as measured with the PTH-I assay. Comparing the two assays, PTH-I was able to quantify the intraoperative PTH decay more quickly than PTH-A.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Declaration of interest
 References
 
Primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) is found in about 2% of individuals over 55 years and is two to three times more common in women than in men (1). Primary HPT is caused by a single parathyroid adenoma in about 80–85% of the cases. In about 15% multiple gland hyperplasia, double adenomas, or, very rarely, parathyroid carcinomas are diagnosed. The diagnosis of pHPT is confirmed by hypercalcemia (or high-normal serum calcium values) in the presence of elevated levels of intact parathyroid hormone (PTH). Urinary tests for calcium and creatinine can distinguish patients with pHPT from those with benign familial hypercalcemic hypocalciuria. Symptoms of pHPT are bone pain, pathologic fractures, muscle weakness, mood swings, and depression. Parathyroidectomy is the only curative therapy for pHPT (1) and surgery for pHPT is now being performed in an increasing number of patients by using an open (2, 3, 4) or endoscopic (5) minimally invasive approach. Instead of routine exploration of all four parathyroid glands, unilateral neck exploration has become the treatment of choice for pHPT in many experienced centers.

Chronic renal failure is one of the most common causes of secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) and tertiary hyperparathyroidism (tHPT). In patients suffering from chronic renal failure phosphorus excretion is inadequate; vitamin D is not sufficiently converted into its active form, the absorption of calcium in the gut is decreased, and therefore hypocalcemia develops. As a result of hypocalcemia, excessive amounts of PTH are secreted, which is associated with hyperplasia of the parathyroid glands. Treatment of renal HPT consists of calcium supplementation, restricting phosphate intake, and administration of vitamin D analogs. If medical treatment is not effective, parathyroidectomy should be considered. Surgical procedures include total parathyroidectomy with autotransplantation or subtotal resection of 3.5 parathyroid glands (6).

Intact PTH consists of a polypeptide chain of 84 amino acids. It is secreted by the parathyroid glands and eliminated mostly via the liver, but it is also passed through the kidneys and stored in the bones. The N-terminal fragment of PTH contains the region that confers bioactivity. Its half-life is only 3–4 min. The C-terminal fragments of PTH (PTH 7–84) have a half-life of several hours and are eliminated by glomerular filtration, thus depending on renal function (7, 8). Since 1991, several quick PTH assays have been established (9, 10, 11). Together with improved preoperative localization methods (ultrasound, sesta-MIBI scan), intraoperative PTH measurement enables unilateral surgery for pHPT and to control the success of parathyroidectomy for both primary and renal hyperparathyroidism (11, 12, 13).

The objectives of the present study were to compare the pre-, intra- and postoperative results of parathyroidectomy in patients with pHPT and renal HPT by measuring intact PTH levels using two different assays (Immulite Turbo DPC and ADVIA Centaur). To compare the two assays, we focused on the decrease in intraoperative PTH levels with regard to renal function and the accuracy in predicting surgical outcome.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Declaration of interest
 References
 
Between June 2005 and December 2006, 91 consecutive patients (63 females, 28 males, mean 55.3 years) undergoing parathyroidectomy for primary (n=57) or renal (n=34) hyperparathyroidism gave informed consent to participate in a prospective study (Fig. 1; Table 1). Among them 70 patients underwent parathyroidectomy at the surgical department of Heidelberg University, and in 21 patient's parathyroidectomy were performed at Salem Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. Briefly, inclusion criteria for the study were parathyroidectomy for pHPT, tHPT, or sHPT in patients older than 18 years, and ability to give informed consent. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Heidelberg, Germany in accordance with the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration of 1975.


Figure 1
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1 Intraoperative parathyroid hormone measurement with two different PTH assays in 91 patients with hyperparathyroidism (HPT).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Characteristics of 91 patients with parathyroidectomy for primary and renal hyperparathyroidism.

 
Surgical technique

Preoperatively in all patients with pHPT, neck ultrasound and a sesta-MIBI scan was performed to localize parathyroid adenomas. For renal HPT only preoperative ultrasound was used to localize hyperplastic parathyroid glands. In patients with previous neck surgery, a selective venous sampling was performed preoperatively.

In 11 patients (19%) with pHPT an open minimally invasive parathyroidectomy was performed. In 46 patients (81%) with pHPT, uni- or bilateral neck exploration was carried out for parathyroid adenoma or hyperplasia. In 28 patients (31%) with additional thyroid disease, a lobectomy or near total thyroidectomy was performed. The medical history of 7 out of the 91 patients (8%) included previous performed neck surgery to treat thyroid disorders. A bilateral neck exploration and total parathyroidectomy with autotransplantation into the tibialis anterior muscle was performed in 34 patients with renal HPT. Preoperatively, 27 patients with sHPT had been treated with chronic hemodialysis. In seven patients with tHPT, kidney transplantation was performed before parathyroidectomy; another three patients received kidney transplants after parathyroidectomy. In 4 out of the 91 study patients (4%), a reoperation was required because of persistent pHPT or tHPT.

In pHPT, a single gland adenoma was found in 55 patients and a double adenoma was found in one patient. In another patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) I syndrome, hyperplasia of the parathyroid glands was seen. In renal hyperparathyroidism four parathyroid glands were removed in 31 out of the 34 patients (91%); in three patients (9%) three parathyroid glands were removed. In one of them parathyroidectomy was required because of persistent tHPT.

Blood sampling and measurement of PTH

Blood samples were obtained immediately after inducing general anesthesia and before commencing the operation; 10, 20, and 30 min after removing a parathyroid adenoma in pHPT; or after the removal of the last (in most cases the fourth) hyperplastic parathyroid gland had been removed in cases of renal HPT and MEN I syndromes. Postoperative blood samples were obtained at 24 h and at 6-month follow-up. Blood specimens were collected in potassium 2.4 ml EDTA tubes and analyzed immediately for intact PTH with the ADVIA Centaur immunoassay (Siemens Medical Solutions, Fernwald, Germany) for intraoperative PTH testing or frozen and analyzed later with the Immulite Turbo DPC assay. Intact PTH levels measured with the ADVIA Centaur immunoassay were given intraoperatively to the surgeons to decide whether to determine or to continue parathyroidectomy. Since increased PTH stability was described for both assays when EDTA plasma tubes were used (14, 15), we used such tubes uniformly for the present study.

Intact PTH was measured with two automated immunoassays: the ADVIA Centaur assay (Siemens Medical Solutions) and the Immulite Turbo DPC assay (DPC Biermann, Bad Nauheim, Germany). The intraoperative PTH assay was used to determine the success and thus the end of the operation. After PTH levels declined intraoperatively to 10% of baseline or to the normal range (below 7.6 pmol/l) the operation was finished.

The ADVIA Centaur assay is an automated two-site sandwich immunoassay using direct chemiluminometric technology (16). The assay utilizes two purified polyclonal antibodies that target the N-terminal 1–34 and C-terminal 39–84 regions of the PTH molecule. The incubation time of intact PTH with the ADVIA Centaur assay takes 18 min. The detection limits of the assay are 0.26–7.6 pmol/l.

The Immulite Turbo analyzer, another solid phase two-site chemiluminescent assay DPC, was used for second-line PTH measurement. This assay requires that two enzyme-labeled antibodies specific for the C-terminal (amino acids 44–84) and N-terminal (amino acids 1–34) bind to regions of the intact PTH molecule. The half-life of intact PTH is 2–5 min (7). The incubation time of intact PTH with the described Turbo assay takes 14 min and has an analytical range of 0.31–263 pmol/l. Plasma specimen analyzed with this assay was immediately frozen at –20°C and examined later together with other samples.

Statistical analysis

SAS software (Release 9.1; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics of quantitative parameters (e.g. age, calcium, and PTH levels) are presented as median and range, whereas qualitative parameters (e.g. sex, PTH decrease ≥90%) are presented as absolute and relative rates.

According to their renal function, patients with pHPT and tHPT and patients with sHPT were divided into two independent groups and analyzed separately. Overall, analyses were based on an intention-to-treat cohort of successfully treated patients, which produced varying sample sizes at distinct times. For both groups and the two different PTH assays, three main outcome parameters were tested: i) a decrease in the intraoperative PTH levels to the normal range (yes/no); ii) a decrease in intraoperative PTH ≥90% (yes/no); and iii) differences between the two assays in the relative PTH decrease. All other parameters were tested exploratively. First and second outcome parameters were tested using the McNemar test. The third outcome parameter was tested using the signed-rank test. An effect was considered statistically significant at P<0.05 (two-sided). Standard regression analysis was done using MEDCALC software (MedCalc Software, Mariakerke, Belgium).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Declaration of interest
 References
 
In patients participating in the study, successful parathyroidectomy was monitored in 85 out of the 91 cases during the first operation and in another patient in a second operation (Fig. 1). Patients with persistent disease were excluded from the evaluation of the intraoperative PTH decrease. The remaining 85 patients with HPT were divided according to their renal function into two study groups with normal (n=59 patients, pHPT and tHPT) or impaired renal function (n=26 patients, sHPT).

PTH measurement in patients with normal renal function (pHPT and tHPT)

In 57 patients with pHPT and seven patients with tHPT, median preoperative creatinine levels of 0.7 mg/dl (0.4–1.1 mg/dl) and 1.36 mg/dl (0.68–1.7 mg/dl) respectively, displayed normal renal function. Preoperative serum calcium levels were elevated in 55 out of the 64 patients (86%) with pHPT and tHPT. Median preoperative PTH concentrations in patients with pHPT and tHPT were 14.8 pmol/l (0.9–91.7 pmol/l) as measured with the AVDIA Centaur assay (PTH-A) and 14.6 pmol/l (0.5–76.6 pmol/l) as measured with the Immulite Turbo assay (PTH-I). In all of the 91 patients (pHPT, tHPT, and sHPT), PTH concentrations obtained in each of the two assays are compared in Fig. 2.


Figure 2
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2 Regression parameters for intraoperative PTH measured in 91 samples by two commercial assays (PTH-A and PTH-I).

 
Ten minutes after parathyroidectomy, intraoperative PTH-A levels dropped to the normal range in 84% of the patients with pHPT and tHPT compared with 100% of the samples measured with the Immulite Turbo DPC assay (P=0.0082, Table 2). At the same time, a median PTH decrease of 90% or more was found in 16% as measured by PTH-A compared with 50% by PTH-I (P<0.0001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Intra- and postoperative PTH levels after successful parathyroidectomy in 59 patients with pHPT and tHPT.

 
Twenty minutes after resection of parathyroid adenoma, PTH-A levels were measured in the normal range in 96% of the patients compared with 100% of the samples tested with the Immulite Turbo DPC assay. In tHPT, PTH levels had normalized in 86% according to PTH-A and in 100% according to PTH-I. Thirty minutes after parathyroidectomy, a normalization of PTH-A in pHPT and tHPT was found in 98%, and in 100% with PTH-I. In pHPT, at all points of intraoperative PTH testing (preoperatively, 10, 20, and 30 min after parathyroidectomy) mean PTH levels by PTH-I were 5.1, 37.8, 48.0, and 47.4% lower than levels by PTH-A. Comparable results were seen in tHPT with mean PTH levels of 11.3, 64.7, and 30% determined by PTH-I, and 28.6% lower than levels by PTH-A.

PTH measurement in patients with impaired renal function sHPT

In 27 patients with sHPT and renal dysfunction, median creatinine was elevated at 5.38 mg/dl (1.7–7.3 mg/dl). Of these 27 patients with sHPT 26 were on chronic hemodialysis. Preoperative serum calcium levels were elevated in 14 out of the 27 patients (52%) with renal hyperparathyroidism (Table 1).

In sHPT, 10 min after total parathyroidectomy, 30% of the patients displayed normal PTH levels by PTH-A and 74% reached normal levels by PTH-I (P=0.0039; Table 3). Twenty minutes after parathyroidectomy for sHPT, a normalization of PTH-A findings was seen in 50% compared with 100% of the PTH-I samples (P=0.0009). At the same time, a PTH decrease of 90% or more was found by PTH-A in 54% and by PTH-I in 100% (P=0.0016). Thirty minutes after parathyroidectomy, levels determined by PTH-I had normalized in all of the patients, whereas levels by PTH-A dropped in 62% to the normal range (P=0.0047). In patients with renal failure and sHPT, continuing differences between the two assays were seen with mean levels determined by PTH-I that were 7.5, 49.5, 29.7, and 26.9% lower than those by PTH-A.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Intra- and postoperative PTH levels after successful parathyroidectomy in 26 patients with sHPT.

 
Twenty-four hours postoperatively, all of the patients with pHPT, tHPT, and sHPT displayed PTH levels within the normal range as measured with both assays. In patients with pHPT and tHPT, median PTH concentrations as determined by PTH-A and PTH-I were 0.9 and 0.6 pmol/l respectively. In sHPT, levels measured by both PTH-A and PTH-I were exactly 0.5 pmol/l.

At a mean follow-up of 6 months (3–19 months), 38 out of the 40 patients (95%) with pHPT and 29 out of the 30 patients (96%) with renal HPT undergoing parathyroidectomy at the University Hospital Heidelberg presented with normal serum calcium and PTH levels. In the other participating hospital, 14 out of the 17 patients (82%) with pHPT and all seven patients with renal hyperparathyroidism were cured after the initial surgical procedure. During a second operation, a parathyroid adenoma (n=4) or hyperplastic parathyroid glands (n=2) were found in patients with persistent disease. In a 26-year-old woman with pHPT caused by parathyroid hyperplasia related to MEN I syndrome, seven parathyroid glands were removed. At follow-up examination, the patient still presented with elevated calcium and PTH levels. Persistent renal HPT was seen in a 75-year-old woman after five parathyroid glands had been removed. In all of the six patients with persistent HPT, PTH levels remained pathologically elevated at the end of the operation and at 24-hour follow-up according to both PTH assays. Clearly elevated PTH levels were seen with both assays in another 64-year-old male patient with pHPT after a large parathyroid adenoma of 2.5 cm (2.3 g) was removed from the carotid sheet. In an ongoing exploration of the other side of the neck a large double adenoma of 2.5 cm (0.5 g) was found in the same position. Since both assays displayed elevated PTH levels in patients with persistent HPT, the intra- and postoperative specificity of both assays was 100%.

Postoperative complications were seen in one patient who had previously undergone neck surgery for thyroid disease; this patient showed a persistent unilateral paresis of the recurrent laryngeal nerve after parathyroidectomy. Therefore, the rate of persistent unilateral recurrent nerve paresis was 1.1%. Two patients with sHPT developed hypoparathyroidism, one of them after kidney transplantation. In both cases, an autotransplantation of frozen parathyroid tissue is planned.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Declaration of interest
 References
 
Intraoperative PTH measurement enables unilateral neck exploration for pHPT (2, 3, 4, 5, 17) and predicts successful surgery for parathyroid adenoma in primary HPT or confirms the adequate resection of hyperfunctioning parathyroid tissue in renal hyperparathyroidism (12, 13). In patients with chronic renal failure, non-(1–84) PTH fragments accumulate, and prolonged degradation of PTH fragments has been observed (18, 19). Renal failure may also slow intraoperative PTH clearance in patients with sHPT (20, 21). Recently, however, new and more accurate PTH assays have been developed which are able to more precisely confirm the adequate resection of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands in renal HPT (12, 13, 22, 23).

For both primary and renal HPT several intraoperative PTH assays have been described, but the different assays have only been directly compared in a small number of studies (13, 18, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27). The Immulite Turbo DPC assay is established for both primary HPT (24, 28) and renal HPT (12). Kao et al. (28) described that the intraoperative PTH value, as measured with the Immulite Turbo DPC assay, decreased to <5 pmol/l (normal range) within 20 min after resection of parathyroid adenoma in 87% of patients.

Amal et al. (16) showed that the ADVIA Centaur assay was able to distinguish clearly between primary HPT and non-parathyroid hypercalcemia. In uremic patients with sHPT, however, the ADVIA Centaur assay measured higher PTH concentrations than the classical intact PTH IRMA assay (Ntac-PTH, Diasorin, Stillwater, MN, USA). Twomey et al. (15) showed with the ADVIA Centaur assay that intra-individual PTH differences as large as 25% can exist on the same day between serum and plasma samples of patients suffering from renal failure.

In this study, we compared, to our knowledge, for the first time the Immulite Turbo DPC assay with the ADVIA Centaur assay for pre-, intra-, and postoperative measurement of intact PTH in patients with primary, secondary, and tertiary HPT. While both assays found only a median difference of 4.7% in preoperative PTH concentrations with marginally higher levels determined by PTH-A levels, the intraoperative PTH decay was clearly different for the two assays. Ten minutes after parathyroidectomy for pHPT/tHPT and sHPT, median PTH-I concentrations declined significantly to below 7.6 pmol/l (normal range) in 100 and 74% of the patients respectively. At the same time point, median concentrations by PTH-A reached the normal range in 84% in pHPT and tHPT and only in 30% in patients with renal failure and sHPT. A complete normalization of intraoperative PTH concentrations was found by PTH-I in all of the patients regardless of renal function 20 min after parathyroidectomy. Intraoperative PTH concentrations below 7.6 pmol/l measured with the ADVIA Centaur assay were found at 30 min in 98% of the patients with pHPT and tHPT and in 62% with sHPT. After 24 h postoperatively, concentrations as determined by both PTH-I and PTH-A had returned to or below the normal range in all of the patients.

The most important aspect of intraoperative PTH measurement for surgery is in deciding to determine the operation for HPT after the removal of a parathyroid adenoma or total parathyroidectomy. Reliable and accurate PTH assays are highly predictive of postoperative outcome and cure of these patients (17, 29). In our study, the Immulite Turbo DPC assay was able to predict significantly whether parathyroidectomy was successful in 98% of the patients with pHPT and tHPT after 10 min and 100% of the uremic patients with sHPT after 20 min. The ADVIA Centaur assay was able to predict successful surgery in 98% of the patients with pHPT and tHPT after 30 min and 100% of the patients with sHPT after 24 h. Comparing the two assays, the ADVIA Centaur assay accurately measured intact PTH levels pre- and postoperatively, but the Immulite Turbo DPC assay intraoperatively quantified a PTH decay faster, especially in uremic patients. Comparing both methods in terms of recovery of the C-terminal fragments of PTH (7–84), which are eliminated by glomerular filtration, Souberbielle et al. (30) described a recovery of synthetic PTH (7–84) in 87.6% as measured with the ADVIA Centaur assay. For the Immulite assay, a recovery of PTH (7–84) was described in 62.7% by Worth et al. (27). The different percentage of measuring PTH (7–84) with both assays showing a higher cross reactivity for the ADVIA Centaur assay might explain why this assay declined slower into the normal range in patients with impaired renal function compared with the Immulite assay.

Using the ADVIA Centaur system to measure PTH concentrations intraoperatively would have indicated a more extensive search for additional hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands, 10 min after parathyroidectomy in eight patients with pHPT/tHPT and 20 min after parathyroidectomy in ten patients with sHPT. However, longer operation times and extended neck explorations might carry a probable higher risk of intraoperative morbidity. Both assays were highly predictive for multiglandular disease in patients with double adenomas and persistent HPT.


    Declaration of interest
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Declaration of interest
 References
 
There is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.


    Funding
 
This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sector.


    Acknowledgements
 
The authors thank Bettina Danner and Karin Chrenko, Department of Biometry, University of Ulm, Germany for their support with medical statistics.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Declaration of interest
 References
 

    1. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American Association of Endocrine SurgeonsPosition statement on the diagnosis and management of primary hyperparathyroidism. Endocrine Practice 2005; 11:49–54.[Medline]

    2. Udelsman R. Six hundred fifty-six consecutive explorations for primary hyperparathyroidism. Annals of Surgery 2002; 235:665–670.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    3. Bergenfelz A, Lindblom P, Tibblin S & Westerdahl J. Unilateral versus bilateral neck exploration for primary hyperparathyroidism: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Annals of Surgery 2002; 236:543–551.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    4. Grant CS, Thompson G, Farley D & van Heerden J. Primary hyperparathyroidism surgical management since the introduction of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: Mayo Clinic experience. Archives of Surgery 2005; 140:472–479.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    5. Miccoli P, Berti P, Materazzi G, Massi M, Picone A & Minuto MN. Results of video-assisted parathyroidectomy: single institution's six-year experience. World Journal of Surgery 2004; 28:1216–1218.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    6. Rothmund M, Wagner PK & Schark C. Subtotal parathyroidectomy versus total parathyroidectomy and autotransplantation in secondary hyperparathyroidism: a randomized trial. World Journal of Surgery 1991; 15:745–750.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    7. Kao PC, van Heerden JA, Grant CS, Klee GG & Kholsa S. Clinical performance of parathyroid hormone immunometric assays. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 1992; 67:637–645.[Web of Science][Medline]

    8. Hruska KA, Korkor A, Martin K & Slatopolsky E. Peripheral metabolism of intact parathyroid hormone: role of liver and kidney and the effect of chronic renal failure. Journal of Clinical Investigation 1981; 67:885–892.[Web of Science][Medline]

    9. Bergenfelz A, Norden NE & Ahren B. Intraoperative fall in plasma levels of intact parathyroid hormone after removal of one enlarged parathyroid gland in hyperparathyroid patients. European Journal of Surgery 1991; 157:109–112.[Medline]

    10. Irvin GLIII, Dembrow VD & Prudhomme DL. Operative monitoring of parathyroid gland hyperfunction. American Journal of Surgery 1991; 162:299–302.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    11. Proye CA, Goropoulos A, Franz C, Carnaille B, Vix M, Quievreux JL, Couplet-Lebon G & Racadot A. Usefulness and limits of quick intraoperative measurements of intact (1–84) parathyroid hormone in the surgical management of hyperparathyroidism: sequential measurements in patients with multiglandular disease. Surgery 1991; 110:1035–1042.[Web of Science][Medline]

    12. Weber T, Zeier M, Hinz U, Schilling T & Buchler MW. Impact of parathyroid hormone levels on surgical results in patients with renal hyperparathyroidism. World Journal of Surgery 2005; 29:1176–1179.[Web of Science][Medline]

    13. Bieglmayer C, Kaczirek K, Prager G & Niederle B. Parathyroid hormone monitoring during total parathyroidectomy for renal hyperparathyroidsm: pilot study of the impact of renal function and assay specificity. Clinical Chemistry 2006; 52:1112–1119.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    14. Holmes DT, Levin A, Forer B & Rosenberg F. Preanalytical influences on DPC Immulite 2000 intact PTH assays of plasma and serum from dialysis patients. Clinical Chemistry 2005; 5:915–917.

    15. Twomey PJ, Whitlock T & Pledger DR. Differences between serum and plasma for intact parathyroid hormone measurement in patients with chronic renal failure in routine clinical practice. Journal of Clinical Pathology 2005; 58:1000–1001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    16. Amal L & Bergmann P. Evaluation of a chemiluminescence immunoassay for the determination of intact parathyroid hormone using the ADVIA Centaur. Clinical Laboratory 2004; 50:695–702.[Medline]

    17. Carneiro-Pla DM, Solorzano CC & Irvin GL III. Consequences of targeted parathyroidectomy guided by localization studies without intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2006; 202:715–722.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    18. Lepage R, Roy L, Brossard JH, Rousseau L, Dorais C, Lazure C & D'Amour P. A non-(1–84) circulating parathyroid hormone (PTH) fragment interferes significantly with intact PTH commercial assay measurements in uremic samples. Clinical Chemistry 1998; 44:805–809.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    19. Yamashita H, Gao P, Cantor T, Futata T, Murakami T, Uchino S, Watanabe S, Kawamoto H, Fukagawa M & Noguchi S. Large carboxy-terminal parathyroid hormone (PTH) fragment with a relatively longer half-life than 1-84 PTH is secreted directly from the parathyroid gland in humans. European Journal of Endocrinology 2003; 149:301–306.[Abstract]

    20. Lokey J, Pattou F, Mondragon-Sanchez A, Minuto M, Mullineris B, Wambergue F, Foissac-Geroux P, Noel C, de Sagazan HL, VanHille P & Proye CA. Intraoperative decay profile of intact (1–84) parathyroid hormone in surgery for renal hyperparathyroidism – a consecutive series of 80 patients. Surgery 2000; 128:1029–1034.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    21. Brossard JH, Cloutier M, Roy L, Lepage R, Gascon-Barre M & D'Amour P. Accumulation of a non-(1–84) molecular form of parathyroid hormone (PTH) detected by intact PTH assay in renal failure: importance in the interpretation of PTH values. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1996; 81:3923–3929.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    22. Seehofer D, Rayes N, Ulrich F, Muller C, Lang M, Neuhaus P & Steinmuller T. Intraoperative measurement of intact parathyroid hormone in renal hyperparathyroidism by an inexpensive routine assay. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 2001; 386:440–443.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    23. Haustein SV, Mack E, Starling JR & Chen H. The role of intraoperative parathyroid hormone testing in patients with tertiary hyperparathyroidism after renal transplantation. Surgery 2005; 138:1066–1071.[Web of Science][Medline]

    24. Johnson LR, Doherty G, Lairmore T, Moley JF, Brunt LM, Koenig J & Scott MG. Evaluation of the performance and clinical impact of a rapid intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay in conjunction with preoperative imaging and concise parathyroidectomy. Clinical Chemistry 2001; 47:919–925.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    25. Hermse D, Franzson L, Hoffmann JP, Isaksson A, Kaufman JM, Leary E, Muller C, Nakatsuka K, Nishizawa Y, Reinauer H, Riesen W, Roth HJ, Steinmuller T, Troch T & Bergmann P. Multicenter evaluation of a new immunoassay for intact PTH measurement on the Elecsys System 2010 and 1010. Clinical Laboratory 2002; 48:131–141.[Medline]

    26. Yamashita H, Gao P, Cantor T, Noguchi S, Uchino S, Watanabe S, Ogawa T, Kawamoto H & Fukagawa M. Comparison of parathyroid hormone levels from the intact and whole parathyroid hormone assays after parathyroidectomy for primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism. Surgery 2004; 135:149–156.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    27. Worth GK, Vasikaran SD, Retallack RW, Musk AA & Gutteridge DH. Major method-specific differences in the measurement of intact parathyroid hormone: studies in patients with and without chronic renal failure. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry 2004; 41:149–154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    28. Kao PC, van Heerden JA, Farley DR, Thompson GB & Taylor RL. Intraoperative monitoring of parathyroid hormone with a rapid automated assay that is commercially available. Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science 2002; 32:244–251.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    29. Westerdahl J & Bergenfelz A. Sestamibi scan-directed parathyroid surgery: potentially high failure rate without measurement of intraoperative parathyroid hormone. World Journal of Surgery 2004; 28:1132–1138.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    30. Souberbielle J-C, Boutten A, Carlier M-C, Chevenne D, Coumaros G, Lawson-Body E, Massart C, Monge M, Myara J, Parent X, Plouvier E & Houillier P. Inter-method variability in PTH measurement: implication for the care of CKD patients. Kidney International 2006; 70:345–350.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]


Received 28 October 2008
Accepted 29 October 2008





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
EJE-08-0292v1
160/2/275    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, S.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, S.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS