Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/EJE-07-0148
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 157, suppl_1, S15-S26
Copyright © 2007 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walenkamp, M J E
Right arrow Articles by Wit, J M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walenkamp, M J E
Right arrow Articles by Wit, J M

ARTICLE

Genetic disorders in the GH–IGF-I axis in mouse and man

M J E Walenkamp and J M Wit

Department of Pediatrics J6-S, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands

(Correspondence should be addressed to M J E Walenkamp; Email: m.walenkamp{at}lumc.nl)

This paper was presented at the Ipsen symposium, ‘The evolving biology of growth and metabolism’, Lisbon, Portugal, 16–18 March 2007. Ipsen has supported the publication of these proceedings.

Abstract

Animal knockout experiments have offered the opportunity to study genes that play a role in growth and development. In the last few years, reports of patients with genetic defects in GH–IGF-I axis have greatly increased our knowledge of genetically determined causes of short stature. We will present the animal data and human reports of genetic disorders in the GH–IGF-I axis in order to describe the role of the GH–IGF-I axis in intrauterine and postnatal growth. In addition, the effects of the GH–IGF-I axis on the development and function of different organ systems such as brain, inner ear, eye, skeleton, glucose homeostasis, gonadal function, and immune system will be discussed. The number of patients with genetic defects in the GH–IGF-I axis is small, and a systematic diagnostic approach and selective genetic analysis in a patient with short stature are essential to identify more patients. Finally, the implications of a genetic defect in the GH–IGF-I axis for the patient and the therapeutic options will be discussed.

Introduction

Reports of patients with genetic defects in growth hormone–insulin-like growth factor-I (GH–IGF-I) axis, in addition to animal knockout experiments, have considerably increased our knowledge on the role of the GH–IGF-I axis in growth and development throughout life. By means of these reports we will describe the factors playing a role in intrauterine as well as postnatal growth and the effect of the GH–IGF-I axis on the development and function of different organs. Finally, the tools for the diagnostic approach for the physician and the clinical implications for the patients will be discussed.

Intrauterine growth

The first evidence that intrauterine growth is determined by GH-independent IGF-I secretion comes from animal experiments. Mice with severe GH deficiency due to spontaneous mutations in the genes encoding GH-releasing hormone receptor (GHRHR) (little mouse), Pit 1 (Snell dwarf), and Prop-1 (Ames dwarf) have a normal birth weight (1). The GH-insensitive Laron mouse is born with a normal body size and weight (2). In contrast, IGF-I and IGF-I receptor (IGF1R) knockout mice have birth weights of 60 and 45% of normal respectively. From these observations, it was concluded that IGF-I is a growth determinant factor for intrauterine growth, independently of GH (35). The effects of IGF-I are mediated by the IGF1R, which is in line with the observation that the IGF1R–/ – mice and the IGF1R–/ IGF-I–/ – mice are equally growth retarded at birth (45% of normal) (3). IGF1R–/– knockout mice die within minutes after birth due to respiratory failure (3). IGF1R+/– mice are phenotypically normal (3). Disruptions in the IGF-I signaling pathway as described in mice deficient in Akt1, insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) or IRS-2 result in reduced intrauterine growth (69).

In the human, GH deficiency and insensitivity result in a normal birth size (1012). In contrast, an IGF-I gene deletion or mutation results in severe intrauterine growth retardation as is demonstrated in the patient described by Woods et al. (birth weight and length: –3.9 and –5.4 SDS respectively), Walenkamp et al. (–3.9 and –4.3 SDS respectively) and Bonapace et al. (–4 and –6.5 SDS respectively) (1315). The finding that genetically determined low IGF-I levels, due to polymorphisms in the IGF-I promoter region, result in a reduced birth weight and length support the role of IGF-I in fetal growth (16, 17).

There are also indications of an IGF-I dose effect on intrauterine growth. IGF-I heterozygous mice are 10–20% smaller at birth (4), and in the human we found that carriers of an IGF-I missense mutation have a 10% lower birth weight than noncarriers (14).

In contrast to the observations in mice, heterozygous mutations of the IGF1R result in intrauterine growth retardation in the human (1822). The degree of intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) varies between –1.5 and –3.5 SDS for birth weight and between –0.3 and –5.8 SDS for birth length. The different mutations result in a variable degree of remaining IGF-I signaling, which may explain the wide range of birth size. Another hypothesis is that maternal IGF-I resistance during pregnancy in the mothers with a heterozygous IGF1R mutation contributes to more severe growth retardation. This is supported by the finding that children with an affected mother are more growth retarded at birth than children with an apparently non-affected mother (22).

IGF1R haploinsufficiency is associated with a variable degree of intrauterine growth retardation (–1.8 to –5.6 SDS) as is demonstrated in patients with a terminal 15q deletion, including the IGF1R gene (2330). The report of a patient with three copies of the IGF1R gene supports the concept that a gene dose effect plays a role in intrauterine growth. This patient is born at 42 weeks gestational age with a birth weight of 5140 g, a birth length of 60 cm, and a head circumference of 38.5 cm (28).

So far, genetic defects in the IGF-I signaling pathway are not described in humans. However, in a recent study by Laviola et al., the IRS-2 and Akt pathways were down-regulated in human placentas from pregnancies complicated by IUGR, indicating an important role for IGF-I signaling in the appropriate development of the fetoplacental unit (31).

Acid-labile subunit (ALS) forms a ternary complex with IGF-I or IGF-II and IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-3 or IGFBP-5 in the circulation to increase the half-life of the IGFs. ALS deficiency appears to have no effect on fetal growth in ALS knockout mice (32). Data on intrauterine growth of ALS-deficient patients are limited, as the first described patient is adopted and gestational age is not available. At the age of one week, weight was 2500 g and length was 47 cm, which is considered normal (33). In addition, from the second patient no data regarding gestation, birth weight or length are available (34). Since expression of ALS occurs late in fetal life (35), severe effects on intrauterine growth are unlikely.

Although this review focuses on genetic defects in the GH–IGF-I axis, the importance of the role of IGF-II in intrauterine growth cannot be left unmentioned. IGF-II acts as an important modulator of placental cell proliferation and maturation (36). A positive correlation has been demonstrated between cord blood IGF-II and placental weight (37). However, controversy exists with regard to the relation between fetal serum IGF-II levels and fetal growth. Some studies report reduced cord blood IGF-II levels in IUGR babies (3840), while others report similar levels of IGF-II in IUGR and normal fetuses (41). Human mutations in the gene encoding IGF-II, located on 11p15, have not been identified so far. However, alterations in imprinting status of the IGF-II gene are associated with severe IUGR as part of the Silver–Russell syndrome (a condition characterized by severe IUGR, postnatal growth failure, dysmorphic facial features, and body asymmetry). The IGF-II gene is paternally expressed. A maternal duplication of 11p15 or demethylation of the telomeric imprinting center ICR1 on 11p15, resulting in underexpression of IGF-II, is found in 50% of patients with Silver–Russell syndrome (4244).

Postnatal growth

The first two weeks of postnatal life growth of the Snell dwarf, the Ames dwarf, the little mouse, and the Laron mouse is indistinguishable from the wild-type litter-mates (1). However, at postnatal day 40, their size is about 50% of normal, which confirms the increasing role of GH in postnatal life. The size of the IGF-I knockout mice decreases progressively from 60% of normal at birth to 30% of normal at 8 weeks. Double knockout mice (GHR–/ and IGF-I–/ –) have a postnatal growth pattern of 17% of normal (45). These findings demonstrate that GH-dependent IGF-I action is the main determinant of postnatal growth, but that GH and IGF-I have also independent effects (45). Targeted gene deletion of liver-specific IGF-I and ALS, resulting in a 85–90% reduction of circulating IGF-I, shows a 20% lower body weight than control mice. This implicates that, while endocrine IGF-I is important in postnatal growth, tissue IGF-I also plays a role since the total IGF-I–/ – mouse is more growth retarded (46).

The classical heterozygous IGF1R–/+ mice are phenotypically normal, with normal expression of IGF1R mRNA, suggesting that the intact wild-type allele is up-regulated and that a single functional IGF1R allele is sufficient to ensure normal growth (3). However, later experiments inducing reduced availability of the IGF1R (41% less than normal) showed a growth deficit of 13 and 6% in males and females respectively, implying that a partial reduction in IGF-I signaling reduces the growth potential, at least in the male mouse (47).

In the human, severe isolated GH deficiency leads to a final height ranging from –3.9 to –6.1 SDS (mean –4.7 SDS) (48). GH deficiency due to GHRHR mutations results in a mean final height of –7.2 SDS (49). Patients with GH insensitivity due to a GHR mutation reach a final height varying from –3.2 to –12 SDS (12, 50, 51) and due to a STAT5b mutation from –5.9 to –7.8 SDS (5254). Complete IGF-I deficiency due to a deletion of the IGF-I gene results in a final height of –6.9 SDS (13). The final height of the patient with an inactivating mutation of the IGF-I gene is –8.5 SDS (14). The height of a patient with a mutation resulting in extremely low IGF-I levels at the age of 19 months is –6.2 SDS (15). These results show that GH deficiency results in a similar growth pattern as primary IGF-I deficiency, which emphasizes the predominant role of GH-dependent IGF-I production in postnatal growth. Treating GH-deficient patients with GH results in a better growth response than treating GH-insensitive patients with recombinant human (rh)IGF-I, suggesting that a direct GH effect is necessary for optimal postnatal growth (55).

GH insensitivity caused by a STAT5b mutation results in severe postnatal growth retardation in males and females. In contrast, the homozygous ablation of STAT5b in mice results in loss of the sexual dimorphism in body growth: the postnatal growth curves of female wild-type, female STAT5b–/ – and male STAT5b–/ – mice show no significant difference (56). STAT5b gene disruption in mice leads to a loss of the sexually dimorphic pituitary pulsatile GH secretion pattern and liver gene expression. It is uncertain how this difference with regard to the interaction between sex steroids and the GH–STAT5b–IGF-I axis in mouse versus human can be explained. One explanation may be that in the mouse the growth-promoting effect of the typical male pattern of GH secretion (high GH peaks, low troughs) is transmitted by STAT5b, while the irregular GH profile of female rats, with lower peaks and higher troughs, is primarily transmitted by another signal transduction route. Knocking out STAT5b in the mouse can then be expected to abolish the sexual dimorphism in growth in the rat. In the human, the GH profile is not different between sexes, and is similar to the pattern of GH secretion seen in male rats. A STAT5b defect would then be expected to have a similar effect in both sexes (56, 57).

Patients with IGF-I insensitivity due to IGF1R mutations show more variety in postnatal growth (–0.9 to –4.8 SDS) than patients with IGF-I deficiency. The phenotype variability in IGF-I insensitivity is most probably caused by differences in remaining IGF-I signaling or by a compensatory mechanism that up-regulates the expression of the normal IGF1R allele. In addition, a gene dose effect seems to play a role in postnatal growth as is demonstrated by the severe postnatal growth failure (–3.5 to –6.3 SDS) of patients with IGF1R haploinsufficiency due to a terminal 15q deletion, including the IGF1R gene (23, 25, 26, 2830). The finding that trisomy of terminal 15q resulting in duplication of the IGF1R gene is associated with tall stature supports this hypothesis (58).

Two patients with ALS deficiency due to a mutation in the ALS gene have been described (33, 34) and we have recently reported two affected siblings (59). They present with a variable degree of growth retardation: height at 14.6 years of age –2.05 SDS and final height –0.8 SDS in the patient described by Domene et al., –2.1 SDS at 15.5 years of age in the patient described by Hwa et al., final height was –4.2 SDS in one of the siblings and height was –4.3 SDS at the age of 16.5 years in the other sibling. Extremely low IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels are a common finding in all these patients. A high flux of free IGF-I into the tissues and rapid proteolysis of IGF-I can explain this feature. Another possibility is that paracrine and autocrine IGF-I effects, stimulated by increased GH production, compensate for the deficiency of circulatory IGF-I (34).

Regulation of GH secretion

The regulation of GH secretion is complex. Briefly, GHRH stimulates GH synthesis and determines the amplitude of the pulses, while the intermittent withdrawal of somatostatin regulates the timing of the GH pulses. The low-amplitude spontaneous GH release in patients with a GHRHR mutation supports this hypothesis (60). The autofeedback mechanism of GH and IGF-I suppresses GHRH and stimulates somatostatin expression.

Age, gender, sex hormones and adiposity influence the magnitude of GH secretion (61). Ghrelin, a hormone predominantly produced in the stomach, stimulates GH release and appetite. Ghrelin–/ mouse has a normal phenotype, suggesting that ghrelin itself is not required for growth (62). Human mutations have not yet been described. Ghrelin acts via the GH secretagog receptor (GHSR). Recently, two families with a GHSR missense mutation resulting in impairment of the constitutive activity of the receptor were identified. The heights of the homozygous probands were –3.7 and –3.2 SDS, supporting the hypothesis that ghrelin signaling via the GHSR plays a role in the GH–IGF-I axis (63).

In patients with GH insensitivity, low IGF-I levels result in loss of negative feedback and as a consequence increased GH secretion. IGF-I therapy restores GH secretion to normal, implying that the sensitivity of the feedback mechanism is intact in these patients (64). In addition to the increased GH secretion, prolactin levels are slightly elevated in patients with GHI due to a GHR mutation (65). This may be the result of increased GHRH secretion as a consequence of the diminished negative feedback of IGF-I and GH, which also stimulates the prolactin secretion from somatolactotroph cells in the pituitary. Indeed, the elevated prolactin levels are suppressed upon IGF-I administration, in line with the inhibitory action of IGF-I on hypothalamic GHRH neurons (65). In patients with a STAT5b mutation, prolactin levels are even more elevated (52, 54, 66). This can be explained by the obligatory role of STAT5b in mediating the negative feedback action of prolactin on tuberoinfundibular dopamine neurons; in the absence of STAT5b, the signal transduction in the hypothalamic dopamine neurons is impaired (67).

Patients with IGF-I insensitivity are characterized by elevated IGF-I levels as a result of increased GH production due to pituitary and hypothalamic IGF1R deficiency. This is supported by the finding that IGF1R–/ – mice exhibit signs of somatotropic stimulation in the pituitary (61). However, in patients with poor caloric intake IGF-I can be in the normal range, which should be considered as relatively high for a malnourished infant or child. Restoring the nutritional status increases the IGF-I level above the normal range (22).

Patients with IGF1R haploinsufficiency have normal or elevated IGF-I levels (23, 25, 26, 30). Stimulated GH secretion was normal in all tested patients (24, 26, 2830). Apparently, IGF1R haploinsufficiency has no major impact on GH and IGF-I secretion.

IGFBPs

IGF-I is secreted into the circulation and associates with soluble high-affinity binding proteins, the IGFBPs. IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-5 form a complex with IGF-I and ALS. This ternary complex slows the clearance of IGF-I. Changes in IGFBP expression have an important role in modulating the growth-promoting actions of the IGFs.

In mice, reports of IGFBP knockout models are limited and demonstrate only few phenotypic manifestations (68). Overexpression of IGFBP-1 in transgenic mice results in a modest and transient impairment of fetal growth. In addition, maternal IGFBP-1 excess is associated with reduced fetal growth indicating placental insufficiency (69). In human, there is a striking inverse correlation between maternal and fetal circulating levels of IGFBP-1 and fetal size (39, 44, 70, 71). It is postulated that IGFBP-1 inhibits the growth-promoting effect of IGF-I by binding fetal IGFs in IUGR. Indeed, IGFBP-1 levels and mRNA expression are markedly elevated in the umbilical cord blood of babies with profound and prolonged hypoxia, which is considered a leading cause of IUGR (72). In a recent study, the key role of IGFBP-1 in mediating the effects of hypoxia on fetal growth was confirmed in zebrafish, suggesting this is a conserved physiological mechanism to restrict IGF-stimulated growth under hypoxic conditions (73).

IGFBP-1 is synthesized in the liver, where its expression is under the control of insulin which suppresses its production (74). It has also been suggested that GH directly regulates IGFBP-1 secretion (75). In a patient with the IGF-I deletion, IGFBP-1 was low. This patient was severely insulin resistant and a combination of high insulin levels, the absence of IGF-I, and increased GH levels probably contributed to the low IGFBP-1 levels. Treatment of this patient with rhIGF-I resulted in beneficial effects on insulin resistance, decreased GH secretion, and higher IGFBP-1 levels (76). A patient with the inactivating mutation of the IGF-I gene was not severely insulin resistant and had also low IGFBP-1 levels, suggesting an important role of a direct suppressive effect of GH on IGFBP-1 (14). A patient with ALS deficiency also had low IGFBP-1 levels, which can also be attributed to stimulated GH levels (33).

IGFBP-2 levels were low in the patient with the IGF-I gene deletion. rhIGF-I treatment increased the IGFBP-2 levels (76). IGFBP-2 in the patient with the IGF-I mutation was –1 SDS (14). The patient with ALS deficiency had low IGFBP-2 levels (33). These data suggest that GH plays a role in regulating IGFBP-2 production.

In the absence of ALS, IGFBP-3 is cleared very quickly, resulting in extremely low serum concentrations (33, 77). The transcription of IGFBP-3 is induced by activation of the GH signal transduction pathway, including STAT5b. Therefore, IGFBP-3 is a valuable biochemical parameter in differentiating a GH receptor or postreceptor defect from an IGF-I or IGF1R defect. In the latter, IGFBP-3 levels are normal (13, 14, 22), while in patients with a GHR defect or a STAT5b mutation, IGFBP-3 is low (51, 52, 54, 77).

The GH/IGF-I axis in brain development

IGF-I plays a key role in the development of the central nervous system (CNS), stimulating neurogenesis and synaptogenesis, facilitatingoligodendrocyte development, promoting neuron and oligodendrocyte survival, and stimulating myelination (78). In addition, IGF-I appears to be a potent agent for rescuing neurons from apoptosis. Since systemic IGF-I is not readily transported through the blood–brain barrier, local production of IGF-I is considered to be responsible for these effects (79).

Psychomotor development is normal in patients with GH deficiency or insensitivity (80). Patients with primary IGF-I deficiency due to a deletion or mutation of the IGF-I gene are severely mentally retarded and microcephalic with a head circumference of –4.9 SDS (13) and –5.7 SDS (15) at birth and of –5.3 SDS (13) and –8 SDS (14) in adulthood, emphasizing the essential role of GH-independent IGF-I production in prenatal brain development. The head circumference of carriers of the inactivating IGF-I mutation is within the normal range. However, carriers have a lower head circumference than noncarriers (–1 vs 0.5 SDS). Microcephaly is a common feature in patients with IGF-I insensitivity due to a heterozygous IGF1R mutation, however less severe than in complete IGF-I deficiency (–3 to –5.6 SDS) (22). Psychomotor development in these patients varies from retarded with an IQ of 60 to completely normal. Head circumference in patients with IGF1R haploinsufficiency due to a terminal 15q deletion is not well documented. In two patients, head circumference measured –5.3 (25) and –3 SDS (26). In most cases, psychomotor development was delayed, but the possible contribution of other genes in the deleted region makes conclusions on a causal relation difficult.

Hearing

Recently, the role of IGF-I in auditory function was evaluated. Auditory brainstem responses were analyzed in IGF-I/ mice, showing an all-frequency involved bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. The delayed response to acoustic stimuli along the auditory pathway indicates the contribution of the CNS to the hearing loss in IGF-I deficiency (81). At a cellular level, a significant decrease in number and size of auditory neurons, increased apoptosis of cochlear neurons, a significant reduced volume of the cochlea and cochlear ganglion can result in abnormal differentiation and maturation of the cochlear ganglion cells and abnormal innervation of the sensory cells in the organ of Corti (82).

Audiograms of the three patients with complete IGF-I deficiency due to a homozygous deletion or mutation of the IGF-I gene demonstrate severe bilateral sensorineural deafness (1315). This is confirmed by absent brainstem evoked potentials in one of the patients (14). Seven of the 21 family members of the patient with the inactivating IGF-I mutation, including nine carriers of the inactivating IGF-I mutation, reveal hearing abnormalities. However, no significant association with the carriership could be detected (14). In patients with GH deficiency or insensitivity or heterozygous IGF1R receptor mutations, hearing problems have not been reported.

In conclusion, IGF-I is a key factor in development and postnatal differentiation and maturation of the inner ear.

Vision

In a recent study, the ocular dimensions of patients with Laron syndrome were compared with reference values. Patients with Laron syndrome have a significantly shorter axial length of the eye and shallower anterior chambers. Treatment with IGF-I increases the axial length of the eye (83). The patient with an inactivating IGF-I mutation has a shallow anterior chamber, suggesting that IGF-I may play a role in ocular growth (14).

Retinal vascularization is significantly reduced in patients with defects in GHR, IGF-I, and IGF1R, indicating that IGF-I plays an important role in this phenomenon (84). A strong association has been found between reduced IGF-I levels in preterm children and development of retinopathy of prematurity. Deficient IGF-I levels after premature birth result in initial poor retinal vascular development and a large area of avascular retina (85).

Skeletal features

Limited elbow extensibility is seen in 85% of patients with Laron syndrome over 5 years of age, with increasing severity with age (50). In addition, six out of eight patients with GH deficiency due to a PROP1 mutation show symmetrical limitation of elbow extensibility, correlated with age (86). We also found this feature in a patient with an inactivating mutation of the IGF-I gene, but it was not described in the other patients with IGF-I defects at 19 months and 15.5 years, suggesting that IGF-I plays a role in elbow extensibility later in life. The mechanism is unknown.

Micrognathia is a striking feature in two patients with IGF-I defects. Diewert et al. found that major growth movements and developmental changes in craniofacial tissues take place between 7 and 12 weeks of gestation (87). Significant alterations in growth during this period may produce significant irreversible effects on postnatal craniofacial morphology. One can hypothesize that prenatal IGF-I deficiency may disturb this process and result in micrognathia.

Bone mineral density (BMD)

Studies on skeletal structure in IGF-I–/ – mice show a 17% decrease in cortical bone but an increase in trabecular bone (23 and 88% in male and female respectively) (88). This phenomenon is also observed in IGF-I deficient double knockout mice (liver-specific IGF-I and ALS deletion) (89). Yakar et al. postulated that the ternary complex (IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and ALS) influences bone acquisition in a compartment-specific manner (i.e., cortical versus trabecular bone). The finding that IGF-I deficient mice exhibit greater impairment in bone accretion than GH-deficient mice implies a GH-independent effect of IGF-I on bone formation during postnatal growth (90).

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is a method to assess BMD (in g per cm2). However, the method does not correct for antero-posterior depth and is therefore greatly influenced by bone size. Bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) calculates volumetric density to minimize the effect of bone size on BMD values (91). This method greatly contributes to the interpretation of BMD in patients with short stature.

Patients with GH deficiency due to GHRHR mutations or GH insensitivity due to GHR mutations have a normal BMAD (9294). BMAD in a patient with an IGF-I gene deletion is mildly reduced. Treatment with rhIGF-I resulted in a 7% increase of BMAD, compared with a 17% increase of BMD, suggesting that the increase in BMD is partly attributable to an increase in bone size (95). In contrast, severe osteoporosis is demonstrated in a patient with an inactivating IGF-I mutation (14). Two patients with a heterozygous mutation of the IGF1R gene have a normal BMD (18, 22). In one patient with ALS deficiency, severe osteoporosis is found at the age of 16 years (BMD at lumbar spine: –4.6 SDS), with a partial recovery at 19 years of age (BMD at lumbar spine: –2.1 SDS) (96). In a patient we recently described, a similar pattern was observed with an increasing BMD from –5.2 to –4.1 and –2.5 SDS at the age of 16, 17, and 19 years respectively. This suggests that sex steroids can reduce the osteoporotic effects of ALS deficiency during puberty.

Glucose homeostasis

It has been well documented that GH exerts direct effects on insulin secretion as well as indirect effects through increased lipolysis, resulting in elevated free fatty acid (FFA) levels and impaired insulin sensitivity, the ‘lipotoxic effect’ (97). Acute administration of GH has an insulin-like effect, mediated by the JAK-2 signaling pathway. Activation of insulin receptor substrates IRS-1 and IRS-2 leads to recruitment of PI3 kinase and, analogous to the postreceptor events for insulin, results in increased glucose uptake (98). GH therapy is often associated with impaired insulin sensitivity. Prevention of lipolysis by coadministration of GH with FFA regulators can partially prevent the deterioration of insulin sensitivity, indicating that insulin resistance is a consequence of enhanced GH-induced lipolysis (99). In addition, the GH plus FFA regulator combination treatment significantly enhances linear body growth in SGA and control rats. The precise mechanism of this observation remains to be elucidated (100). Chronic excess of GH, as in acromegaly, is associated with insulin resistance and impairment of insulin receptor signal transduction. Treatment of acromegalic patients with somatostatin analogs improves insulin resistance (101). Postreceptor crosstalk between the insulin receptor and GH receptor signaling pathways is believed to play a key role in this process (102).

IGF-I, which has 48% amino acid sequence identity with proinsulin, enhances insulin sensitivity. Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that lower baseline IGF-I levels are associated with a higher risk of insulin resistance (103). Genetically determined low IGF-I levels are associated with an increased risk of insulin resistance (104). Treatment with rhIGF-I improves insulin sensitivity in normal individuals (105), in patients with insulin resistance (106), and in those with diabetes type I (107) or type II (108). The patient with IGF-I deficiency due to an IGF-I deletion had severe insulin resistance, which improved with rhIGF-I treatment (76). Patients with a heterozygous inactivating mutation of the IGF-I gene had higher fasting insulin levels than noncarriers (14). Two patients with a heterozygous IGF1R mutation had a moderate degree of insulin resistance (22, 109). The first described patient with ALS deficiency was insulin resistant (33). These results demonstrate a role of IGF-I in glucose homeostasis. Whether IGF-I directly affects insulin sensitivity or by regulating endogenous GH levels is a topic of intense research.

Body composition

GH is known to have a lipolytic effect, which is illustrated by the finding that GH treatment in GH deficiency reduces adiposity and improves lipid profiles (110). Patients with GH resistance have a markedly decreased ratio of lean mass to fat mass, indicating the lack of the direct antilipolytic effect of GH (50). In the patient with the IGF-I gene deletion, in whom the direct GH effects are intact, a low body fat content was found (19.9%), which is in line with a direct antilipolytic effect of GH (95). Total body fat content increased in this patient after 1 year of treatment with rhIGF-I, which can be explained by the fall in GH levels induced by rhIGF-I. IGF-I has no direct effects on lipolysis or lipogenesis.

Puberty and gonadal function

Puberty is delayed in all conditions associated with IGF-I deficiency: GH deficiency due to a GHRHR mutation (49), GH insensitivity caused by a GHR mutation (50, 111) or a STAT5b mutation (54), IGF-I gene deletion (76), and an inactivating IGF-I mutation (14). One female with a heterozygous IGF1R mutation had menarche at the age of 18 years (22), but one of the patients described by Abbuzahab et al. had a normal onset of puberty (18). The first patient with a mutation of the ALS gene had a delayed onset of puberty (112), but a later report showed a normal onset of puberty (34). These findings suggest that IGF-I plays a role in pubertal onset.

The pubertal growth spurt is decreased in patients with GH deficiency or resistance with normal testosterone levels. This was initially interpreted by speculating that testosterone needs the presence of normal GH secretion to exert its full growth-promoting effect (113). Later, evidence was provided that the growth-stimulating effect of testosterone in puberty may be primarily caused by conversion to estrogens and that estrogens are responsible for the pubertal growth spurt and epiphysial closure (114).

IGF-I–/ – mice are infertile. Males have drastically reduced testosterone levels, caused by a significant developmental delay of Leydig cells. Females fail to ovulate and possess an infantile uterus with hypoplastic endometrium (115). It is difficult to hypothesize on the role of GH and IGF-I in reproductive function in the human, as most reported patients with GH–IGF-I defects are too young. Patients with GHRHR (116) and GHR mutations are reported to be fertile. Gonadal function of a 30-year-old patient with STAT5b mutation was normal (54). The 55-year-old patient with an inactivating IGF-I gene mutation had a small testicular volume, low inhibin B levels, and elevated FSH levels, indicating compromised Sertoli cell function and impaired spermatogenesis (14). The role of IGF-I deficiency in the partial gonadal failure is unclear, as this patient underwent a bilateral inguinal hernia operation, with possible damage to the testicles. Patients with a heterozygous deletion or mutation of the IGF-I (13, 14) or IGF1R gene (22) are fertile. More patients and accurate follow-up at adult age will contribute to unraveling the role of IGF-I in human reproduction.

Immune system

It has been well established that GH and IGF-I affect the development and function of the immune system (117). Most defects in the GH–IGF-I axis are not associated with immune disorders, except the STAT5b mutation. STAT proteins are involved in the signaling pathway of cytokine receptors (118) and the STAT5b–/ mouse exhibits a severe immunologic phenotype (119). So far, five females and one male with a STAT5b mutation have been reported (5254, 66, 77). Five patients have signs of immune deficiency. Clinically, this results in lymphoid interstitial pneumonia due to Pneumocystis carinii (52), recurrent pulmonary infections (53, 77), recurrent infections of skin and respiratory tract, severe chronic lung disease, and herpetic keratitis (66). One patient suffers from juvenile idiopathic arthritis (53). The 30-year-old male patient has no history or signs of immune deficiency (120). Thus, in the human, an intact STAT5b is not obligatory for a normal immune phenotype.

We have described a patient with partial GH insensitivityand severe immune deficiencydue to a mutation of I-{kappa}B{alpha}, disturbing the NF-{kappa}B signaling pathway (121). In vitro studies have shown that GH binding to the GHR can promote the NF-{kappa}B signaling pathway (122). Another patient with severe combined immunodeficiency and GH insensitivity has been described (123). This patient has a mutation of the IL2R{gamma} chain gene, suggesting a common underlying pathogenic mechanism for the endocrinological and immunological problems.

More reports on patients with combined growth and immune disorders are needed to increase our knowledge on the interaction between the immune system and the GH–IGF-I axis.

Longevity

Several lines of evidence suggest an inverse relationship between body size and lifespan in mice (124). For example, Laron mice live up to 55% longer than normal mice (125). Genetic studies in various experimental models suggest that the aging process is regulated by genes that encode proteins from the GH–IGF-I axis. Exciting studies in IGF1R+/– mice with 50% reduction in receptor level show that females live 33% longer and males 16% longer. The longer lifespan could not be attributed to other factors and the authors conclude that IGF-I may be a central regulator of mammalian lifespan (126). At the cellular level, fibroblasts with a reduced number of receptors are better able to survive oxidative stress. By causing damage to DNA, protein, lipids, and cellular components, oxidative stress is the major determinant of the aging process. At the molecular level, the intracellular signaling pathway is down-regulated. Repressing intracellular signals of insulin and IGF-I is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism for extending lifespan.

Caloric restriction also has a positive effect on lifespan. Mild food restriction in normal and the Ames dwarf mice demonstrate changes in the expression of genes related to insulin and IGF-I signaling pathways (127). These changes may cause the animals to become more sensitive to insulin. Since insulin sensitive mutant animals live longer, it is suggested that these genes may play a role in aging and lifespan determination. Studies in the human are limited.

Diagnostic approach

The number of patients with defects in the GH–IGF-I axis is still small, but we believe that they represent the tip of the iceberg. Future studies aimed at detecting known or unknown molecular defects in patients with short stature will undoubtedly make the tip of the iceberg grow.

The diagnostic process to reveal an abnormality in the GH–IGF-I axis begins with an alert physician, who is not satisfied with the diagnosis of idiopathic short stature.

The medical history should include birth weight, length, and head circumference, as low values of these parameters for gestational age are features of a genetic defect in IGF-I, IGF1R, or a not yet described IGF-I signaling disorder. It cannot be stressed enough that measurement of length at birth is very important to detect underlying pathology, and the fear that stretching the legs could be harmful for the hip joint is unjustified (128). Careful evaluation of milestones in development is necessary to have an impression of the psychomotor development. Family history should include height of other family members and, if possible, birth data. The presence of hearing abnormalities in a family should alert the physician to consider an IGF-I defect.

After excluding organic and systemic disorders like Celiac disease and Turner Syndrome, the IGF-I and IGFBP-3 level will determine the follow-up. We recently presented guidelines for the diagnostic process of patients with severe short stature of unknown origin (129).

The procedure for detailed functional and genetic analysis of a patient with short stature and a possible defect in the GH–IGF-I axis depends on the local setting. In the Leiden University Medical Center, the Leiden Growth Genetics Working Group, consisting of pediatric and adult endocrinologists, clinical and molecular geneticists, molecular biologists, and interested physicians meet to discuss the locally, nationally, and internationally referred patients. The referring physician is asked to complete a form to register all the information that is necessary to make a presumptive diagnosis, including phenotypic features of the patient and his or her family and biochemical measurements (IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and GH stimulation test). One of the members of the group assesses the information and can advise on additional testing, for example an IGF-I generation test, measurement of other binding proteins,

GH-binding protein, or ALS. After presentation of the patient and discussion, the decision for the next diagnostic step is made, which can be sequencing a specific gene, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis, single nucleotide polymorphism array, or detailed functional experiments.

Implications for the patient

Idiopathic short stature is an unsatisfactory diagnosis for the physician as well as for the patient. To find the cause of short stature is important for the patient for several reasons. First, with a definite diagnosis the often long-lasting diagnostic process will come to an end. Secondly, it will be possible to give information on the specific defect and accompanying problems; for example, lifestyle advice in case of higher risk of insulin resistance in patients with a heterozygous IGF1R mutation or prevention of osteoporosis in patients with ALS deficiency. Finally, therapeutic options can be discussed. It has been reported that GH therapy in patients with a heterozygous IGF1R mutation or deletion improves growth and head circumference (18, 30, 109, 130). In the late 1980s, trials with rhIGF-I started in patients with GHR defects. Approximately 60 children have been treated with rhIGF-I injections for 2 years or longer. Height SDS increases, although not as much as GH treatment in GH deficient patients (131). The explanation for the modest growth response to rhIGF-I is probably the absence of direct GH effects at the level of the growth plate, including enhancement of local IGF-I production. Recently, an rhIGF-I–rhIGFBP-3 complex, with a longer half-life, has been developed as therapeutic agent. Trials in patients with GH insensitivity are currently in progress (132).

Future perspectives

Future research should be focused on identifying patients with established defects in the GH–IGF-I axis and to carefully evaluate the clinical and biochemical features. Genetic defects in the GH–IGF-I axis are rare and international collaboration will increase the knowledge on the role of the GH–IGF-I axis in growth and development. Finally, it will be a challenge to find new defects in the GH–IGF-I axis in order to unravel the molecular mechanisms that are responsible for the effects of GH and IGF-I on pre- and postnatal growth and development.

Disclosure

This paper forms part of a European Journal of Endocrinology supplement, supported by Ipsen. The authors disclose: J.M. Wit has received a research grant from Ipsen and is member of an advisory board of Ipsen. This article was subject to rigorous peer review before acceptance and publication.

References

    1. Efstratiadis A. Genetics of mouse growth. International Journal of Developmental Biology 1998 42 955–976.[ISI][Medline]

    2. Zhou Y, Xu BC, Maheshwari HG, He L, Reed M, Lozykowski M, Okada S, Cataldo L, Coschigamo K, Wagner TE, Baumann G & Kopchick JJ. A mammalian model for Laron syndrome produced by targeted disruption of the mouse growth hormone receptor/ binding protein gene (the Laron mouse). PNAS 1997 94 13215–13220.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    3. Liu JP, Baker J, Perkins AS, Robertson EJ & Efstratiadis A. Mice carrying null mutations of the genes encoding insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-1) and type 1 IGF receptor (IGF1R). Cell 1993 75 59–72.[ISI][Medline]

    4. Powell-Braxton L, Hollingshead P, Warburton C, Dowd M, Pitts-Meek S, Dalton D, Gillett N & Stewart TA. IGF-I is required for normal embryonic growth in mice. Genes and Development 1993 7 2609–2617.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    5. Baker J, Liu JP, Robertson EJ & Efstratiadis A. Role of insulin-like growth factors in embryonic and postnatal growth. Cell 1993 75 73–82.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    6. Cho H, Thorvaldsen JL, Chu Q, Feng F & Birnbaum MJ. Akt1/PKBalpha is required for normal growth but dispensable for maintenance of glucose homeostasis in mice. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2001 276 38349–38352.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    7. Tamemoto H, Kadowaki T, Tobe K, Yagi T, Sakura H, Hayakawa T, Terauchi Y, Ueki K, Kaburagi Y & Satoh S. Insulin resistance and growth retardation in mice lacking insulin receptor substrate-1. Nature 1994 372 182–186.[CrossRef][Medline]

    8. Araki E, Lipes MA, Patti ME, Bruning JC, Haag B III, Johnson RS & Kahn CR. Alternative pathway of insulin signalling in mice with targeted disruption of the IRS-1 gene. Nature 1994 372 186–190.[CrossRef][Medline]

    9. Withers DJ, Burks DJ, Towery HH, Altamuro SL, Flint CL & White MF. IRS-2 coordinates IGF-1 receptor-mediated beta-cell development and peripheral insulin signalling. Nature Genetics 1999 23 32–40.[ISI][Medline]

    10. Wit JM & van Unen H. Growth of infants with neonatal growth hormone deficiency. Archives of Diseases in Childhood 1992 67 920–924.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    11. Wajnrajch MP, Gertner JM, Harbison MD, Chua SC Jr & Leibel RL. Nonsense mutation in the human growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor causes growth failure analogous to the little (lit) mouse. Nature Genetics 1996 12 88–90.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    12. Savage MO, Blum WF, Ranke MB, Postel-Vinay MC, Cotterill AM, Hall K, Chatelain PG, Preece MA & Rosenfeld RG. Clinical features and endocrine status in patients with growth hormone insensitivity (Laron syndrome). Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1993 77 1465–1471.[Abstract]

    13. Woods KA, Camacho-Hubner C, Savage MO & Clark AJ. Intrauterine growth retardation and postnatal growth failure associated with deletion of the insulin-like growth factor I gene. New England Journal of Medicine 1996 335 1363–1367.[Free Full Text]

    14. Walenkamp MJ, Karperien M, Pereira AM, Hilhorst-Hofstee Y, Van Doorn J, Chen JW, Mohan S, Denley A, Forbes B, van Duyvenvoorde HA, van Thiel SW, Sluimers CA, Bax JJ, de Laat JA, Breuning MB, Romijn JA & Wit JM. Homozygous and heterozygous expression of a novel insulin-like growth factor-I mutation. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2005 902855–2864.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    15. Bonapace G, Concolino D, Formicola S & Strisciuglio P. A novel mutation in a patient with insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) deficiency. Journal of Medical Genetics 2003 40 913–917.[Free Full Text]

    16. Arends N, Johnston L, Hokken-Koelega A, van Duijn C, de Ridder M, Savage M & Clark A. Polymorphism in the IGF-I gene: clinical relevance for short children born small for gestational age (SGA). Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2002 87 2720.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    17. Vaessen N, Janssen JA, Heutink P, Hofman A, Lamberts SW, Oostra BA, Pols HA & van Duijn CM. Association between genetic variation in the gene for insulin-like growth factor-I and low birthweight. Lancet 2002 359 1036–1037.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    18. Abuzzahab MJ, Schneider A, Goddard A, Grigorescu F, Lautier C, Keller E, Kiess W, Klammt J, Kratzsch J, Osgood D, Pfaffle R, Raile K, Seidel B, Smith RJ & Chernausek SD. IGF-I receptor mutations resulting in intrauterine and postnatal growth retardation. New England Journal of Medicine 2003 349 2211–2222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    19. Kawashima Y, Kanzaki S, Yang F, Kinoshita T, Hanaki K, Nagaishi Ji, Ohtsuka Y, Hisatome I, Ninomoya H, Nanba E, Fukushima T & Takahashi SI. Mutation at cleavage site of insulin-like growth factor receptgrowth retardation. Journal of Clinical and Endocrinology Metabolism 2005 90 4679–4687.

    20. Inagaki K, Tiulpakov A, Rubtsov P, Sverdlova P, Peterkova V, Yakar S, Terekhov S & LeRoith D. A familial IGF-1 receptor mutant leads to short stature: clinical and biochemical characterization. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2007 92 1540–1548.

    21. Kawashima Y, Yang F, Miura M, Kinoshita T, Nagaishi JI, Hanaki K & Kanzaki S. A family with short stature born intrauterine growth retardation bearing a new missense mutation at a subunit of IGF-I receptor (R431L). Abstract, The Endocrine Society’s 88th Annual Meeting 2006 P2-117 426.

    22. Walenkamp MJE, Van der Kamp HJ, Pereira AM, Kant SG, van Duyvenvoorde HA, Kruithof MF, Breuning MH, Romijn JA, Karperien M & Wit JM. A variable degree of intrauterine and postnatal growth retardation in a family with a missense mutation in the insulin-like growth factor I receptor. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2006 91 3062–3070.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    23. Roback EW, Barakat AJ, Dev VG, Mbikay M, Chretien M & Butler MG. An infant with deletion of the distal long arm of chromosome 15 (q26.1 – qter) and loss of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor gene. American Journal of Medical Genetics 1991 38 74–79.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    24. Siebler T, Lopaczynski W, Terry CL, Casella SJ, Munson P, De Leon DD, Phang L, Blakemore KJ, McEvoy RC & Kelley RI. Insulin-like growth factor I receptor expression and function in fibroblasts from two patients with deletion of the distal long arm of chromosome 15. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1995 80 3447–3457.[Abstract]

    25. Tonnies H, Schulze I, Hennies HC, Neumann LM, Keitzer R & Neitzel H. De novo terminal deletion of chromosome 15q26.1 characterised by comparative genomic hybridisation and FISH with locus specific probes. Journal of Medical Genetics 2001 38 617–621.[Free Full Text]

    26. Pinson L, Perrin A, Plouzennec C, Parent P, Metz C, Collet M, Le Bris MJ, Douet-Guilbert N, Morel F & De Braekeleer M. Detection of an unexpected subtelomeric 15q26.2 -> qter deletion in a little girl: clinical and cytogenetic studies. American Journal of Medical Genetics 2005 138 160–165.

    27. Bhakta KY, Marlin SJ, Shen JJ & Fernandes CJ. Terminal deletion of chromosome 15q26.1: case report and brief literature review. Journal of Perinatology 2005 25 429–432.[Medline]

    28. Okubo Y, Siddle K, Firth H, O’Rahilly S, Wilson LC, Willatt L, Fukushima T, Takahashi SI, Petry CJ, Saukkonen T, Stanhope R & Dunger DB. Cell proliferation activities on skin fibroblasts from a short child with absence of one copy of the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF1R) gene and a tall child with three copies of the IGF1R gene. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2003 88 5981–5988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    29. Rujirabanjerd S, Suwannarat W, Sripo T, Dissaneevate P, Permsirivanich W & Limprasert P. De novo subtelomeric deletion of 15q associated with satellite translocation in a child with developmental delay and severe growth retardation. American Journal of Medical Genetics 2007 143 271–276.

    30. Walenkamp MJE, de Muinck Keizer-Schrama SM, de Mos M, Kalf ME, van Duyvenvoorde H, Boot AM, Kant SG, White S, Losekoot M, den Dunnen JT, Karperien M & Wit JM. Succesful long-term growth hormone therapy in a girl with haploinsufficiency of the IGF-I receptor due to a terminal 15q26.2 -> qter deletion. 2007 (Submitted).

    31. Laviola L, Perrini S, Belsanti G, Natalicchio A, Montrone C, Leonardini A, Vimercati A, Scioscia M, Selvaggi L, Giorgino R, Greco P & Giorgino F. Intrauterine growth restriction in humans is associated with abnormalities in placental insulin-like growth factor signaling. Endocrinology 2005 146 1498–1505.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    32. Ueki I, Ooi GT, Tremblay ML, Hurst KR, Bach LA & Boisclair YR. Inactivation of the acid labile subunit gene in mice results in mild retardation of postnatal growth despite profound disruptions in the circulating insulin-like growth factor system. PNAS 2000 97 6868–6873.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    33. Domene HM, Bengolea SV, Martinez AS, Ropelato MG, Pennisi P, Scaglia P, Heinrich JJ & Jasper HG. Deficiency of the circulating insulin-like growth factor system associated with inactivation of the acid-labile subunit gene. New England Journal of Medicine 2004 350 570–577.[Free Full Text]

    34. Hwa V, Haeusler G, Pratt KL, Little BM, Frisch H, Koller D & Rosenfeld RG. Total absence of functional acid labile subunit, resulting in severe insulin-like growth factor deficiency and moderate growth failure. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2006 91 1826–1831.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    35. Lewitt MS, Scott FP, Clarke NM, Wu T, Sinosich MJ & Baxter RC. Regulation of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 ternary complex formation in pregnancy. Journal of Endocrinology 1998 159 265–274.[Abstract]

    36. Ohlsson R, Holmgren L, Glaser A, Szpecht A & Pfeifer-Ohlsson S. Insulin-like growth factor 2 and short-range stimulatory loops in control of human placental growth. EMBO Journal 1989 8 1993–1999.[ISI][Medline]

    37. Ong K, Kratzsch J, Kiess W, Costello M, Scott C & Dunger D. Size at birth and cord blood levels of insulin, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), IGF-II, IGF-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1), IGFBP-3, and the soluble IGF-II/mannose-6-phosphate receptor in term human infants. The ALSPAC Study team. Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood. Journal of Clincial Endocrinology and Metabolism 2000 85 4266–4269.

    38. Giudice LC, de Zegher F, Gargosky SE, Dsupin BA, de las FL, Crystal RA, Hintz RL & Rosenfeld RG. Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins in the term and preterm human fetus and neonate with normal and extremes of intrauterine growth. Journal of Clincial Endocrinology and Metabolism 1995 80 1548–1555.

    39. Holmes R, Montemagno R, Jones J, Preece M, Rodeck C & Soothill P. Fetal and maternal plasma insulin-like growth factors and binding proteins in pregnancies with appropriate or retarded fetal growth. Early Human Development 1997 49 7–17.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    40. Leger J, Oury JF, Noel M, Baron S, Benali K, Blot P & Czernichow P. Growth factors and intrauterine growth retardation. I. Serum growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF-II, and IGF binding protein 3 levels in normally grown and growth-retarded human fetuses during the second half of gestation. Pediatric Research 1996 40 94–100.[ISI][Medline]

    41. Lassarre C, Hardouin S, Daffos F, Forestier F, Frankenne F & Binoux M. Serum insulin-like growth factors and insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in the human fetus. Relationships with growth in normal subjects and in subjects with intrauterine growth retardation. Pediatric Research 1991 29 219–225.[ISI][Medline]

    42. Eggermann T, Meyer E, Obermann C, Heil I, Schuler H, Ranke MB, Eggermann K & Wollmann HA. Is maternal duplication of 11p15 associated with Silver–Russell syndrome? Journal of Medical Genetics 2005 42 e26.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    43. Gicquel C, Rossignol S, Cabrol S, Houang M, Steunou V, Barbu V, Danton F, Thibaud N, Merrer ML, Burglen L, Bertrand AM, Netchine I & Bouc YL. Epimutation of the telomeric imprinting center region on chromosome 11p15 in Silver–Russell syndrome. Nature Genetics 2005 37 1003–1007.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    44. Fowden AL, Sibley C, Reik W & Constancia M. Imprinted genes, placental development and fetal growth. Hormone Research 2006 6550–58.[CrossRef][Medline]

    45. Lupu F, Terwilliger JD, Lee K, Segre GV & Efstratiadis A. Roles of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor 1 in mouse postnatal growth. Developmental Biology 2001 229 141–162.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    46. Yakar S, Rosen CJ, Beamer WG, Ackert-Bicknell CL, Wu Y, Liu JL, Ooi GT, Setser J, Frystyk J, Boisclair YR & LeRoith D. Circulating levels of IGF-1 directly regulate bone growth and density. Journal of Clinical Investigation 2002 110 771–781.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    47. Holzenberger M, Leneuve P, Hamard G, Ducos B, Perin L, Binoux M & Le Bouc Y. A targeted partial invalidation of the insulin-like growth factor I receptor gene in mice causes a postnatal growth deficit. Endocrinology 2000 141 2557–2566.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    48. Wit JM, Kamp GA & Rikken B. Spontaneous growth and response to growth hormone treatment in children with growth hormone deficiency and idiopathic short stature. Pediatric Research 1996 39 295–302.[ISI][Medline]

    49. Maheshwari HG, Silverman BL, Dupuis J & Baumann G. Phenotype and genetic analysis of a syndrome caused by an inactivating mutation in the growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor: dwarfism of sindh. Journal of Clincial Endocrinology and Metabolism 1998 83 4065–4074.

    50. Rosenbloom AL, Guevara-Aguirre J, Rosenfeld RG & Francke U. Growth hormone receptor deficiency in Ecuador. Journal of Clincial Endocrinology and Metabolism 1999 84 4436–4443.

    51. Laron Z. Laron syndrome (primary growth hormone resistance or insensitivity): the personal experience 1958–2003. Journal of Clincial Endocrinology and Metabolism 2004 89 1031–1044.

    52. Kofoed EM, Hwa V, Little B, Woods KA, Buckway CK, Tsubaki J, Pratt KL, Bezrodnik L, Jasper H, Tepper A, Heinrich JJ & Rosenfeld RG. Growth hormone insensitivity associated with a STAT5b mutation. New England Journal of Medicine 2003 349 1139–1147.[Free Full Text]

    53. Hwa V, Camacho-Hubner C, Little B, David A, Metherell L, Savage M & Rosenfeld RG. Growth hormone insensitivity and severe short stature in siblings due to a novel splice mutation in exon 13 of the STAT5b gen, The Endocrine Society’s 88th Annual Meeting 2006; P1-839: 379 (Abstract).

    54. Vidarsdottir S, Walenkamp MJ, Pereira AM, Karperien M, Van Doorn J, van Duyvenvoorde HA, White S, Breuning MH, Roelfsema F, Kruithof MF, van Dissel J, Janssen R, Wit JM & Romijn JA. Clinical and biochemical characteristics of a male patient with a novel homozygous STAT5b mutation. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2006 91 3482–3485.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    55. Savage MO, Attie KM, David A, Metherell LA, Clark AJ & Camacho-Hubner C. Endocrine assessment, molecular characterization and treatment of growth hormone insensitivity disorders. Nature Clinical Practice. Endocrinology and Metabolism 2006 2 395–407.

    56. Udy GB, Towers RP, Snell RG, Wilkins RJ, Park SH, Ram PA, Waxman DJ & Davey HW. Requirement of STAT5b for sexual dimorphism of body growth rates and liver gene expression. PNAS 1997 94 7239–7244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    57. Rosenfeld RG. Gender differences in height: an evolutionary perspective. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism 2004 17 1267–1271.[ISI]

    58. Kant SG, Kriek M, Walenkamp MJ, Hansson KB, van Rhijn A, Clayton-Smith J, Wit JM & Breuning MH. Tall stature and duplication of the insulin-like growth factor I receptor gene. European Journal of Medical Genetics 2007 50 1–10.[ISI][Medline]

    59. van Duyvenvoorde HA, Twickler ThB, Van Doorn J, Gerver WJM, Noordam C, Karperien M, Wit JM & Hermus ARMM. A novel mutation of the Acid-Labile Subunit (ALS) in two male siblings is associated with persistent short stature, microcephaly and osteoporosis. Hormone Research 2007; 68:(Suppl 1) 108.

    60. Roelfsema F, Biermasz NR, Veldman RG, Veldhuis JD, Frolich M, Stokvis-Brantsma WH & Wit JM. Growth hormone (GH) secretion in patients with an inactivating defect of the GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) receptor is pulsatile: evidence for a role for non-GHRH inputs into the generation of GH pulses. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2001 86 2459–2464.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    61. Giustina A & Veldhuis JD. Pathophysiology of the neuroregulation of growth hormone secretion in experimental animals and the human. Endocrine Reviews 1998 19 717–797.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    62. Sun Y, Ahmed S & Smith RG. Deletion of ghrelin impairs neither growth nor appetite. Molecular and Cellelar Biology 2003 23 7973–7981.

    63. Pantel J, Legendre M, Cabrol S, Hilal L, Hajaji Y, Morisset S, Nivot S, Vie-Luton MP, Grouselle D, de Kerdanet M, Kadiri A, Epelbaum J, Le Bouc Y & Amselem S. Loss of constitutive activity of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor in familial short stature. Journal of Clinical Investigation 2006 116 760–768.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    64. Vaccarello MA, Diamond FB Jr, Guevara-Aguirre J, Rosenbloom AL, Fielder PJ, Gargosky S, Cohen P, Wilson K & Rosenfeld RG. Hormonal and metabolic effects and pharmacokinetics of recombinant insulin-like growth factor-I in growth hormone receptor deficiency/Laron syndrome. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1993 77 273–280.[Abstract]

    65. Silbergeld A, Klinger B, Schwartz H & Laron Z. Serum prolactin in patients with Laron-type dwarfism: effect of insulin-like growth factor I. Hormone Research 1992 37 160–164.[ISI][Medline]

    66. Bernasconi A, Marino R, Ribas A, Rossi J, Ciaccio M, Oleastro M, Ornani A, Paz R, Rivarola MA, Zelazko M & Belgorosky A. Characterization of immunodeficiency in a patient with growth hormone insensitivity secondary to a novel STAT5b gene mutation. Pediatrics 2006 118 e1584–e1592.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    67. Grattan DR, Xu J, McLachlan MJ, Kokay IC, Bunn SJ, Hovey RC & Davey HW. Feedback regulation of PRL secretion is mediated by the transcription factor, signal transducer, and activator of transcription 5b. Endocrinology 2001 142 3935–3940.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    68. Silha JV & Murphy LJ. Minireview: insights from insulin-like growth factor binding protein transgenic mice. Endocrinology 2002 143 3711–3714.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    69. Crossey PA, Pillai CC & Miell JP. Altered placental development and intrauterine growth restriction in IGF binding protein-1 transgenic mice. Journal of Clinical Investigation 2002 110 411–418.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    70. Street ME, Seghini P, Fieni S, Ziveri MA, Volta C, Martorana D, Viani I, Gramellini D & Bernasconi S. Changes in interleukin-6 and IGF system and their relationships in placenta and cord blood in newborns with fetal growth restriction compared with controls. European Journal of Endocrinology/European Federation of Endocrine Societies 2006 155 567–574.

    71. Osorio M, Torres J, Moya F, Pezzullo J, Salafia C, Baxter R, Schwander J & Fant M. Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and IGF binding proteins-1, -2, and -3 in newborn serum: relationships to fetoplacental growth at term. Early Human Development 1996 46 15–26.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    72. Tazuke SI, Mazure NM, Sugawara J, Carland G, Faessen GH, Suen LF, Irwin JC, Powell DR, Giaccia AJ & Giudice LC. Hypoxia stimulates insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1) gene expression in HepG2 cells: a possible model for IGFBP-1 expression in fetal hypoxia. PNAS 1998 95 10188–10193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    73. Kajimura S, Aida K & Duan C. Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) mediates hypoxia-induced embryonic growth and developmental retardation. PNAS 2005 102 1240–1245.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    74. Holly J & Perks C. The role of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins. Neuroendocrinology 2006 83 154–160.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    75. Norrelund H, Fisker S, Vahl N, Borglum J, Richelsen B, Christiansen JS & Jorgensen JO. Evidence supporting a direct suppressive effect of growth hormone on serum IGFBP-1 levels. Experimental studies in normal, obese and GH-deficient adults. Growth Hormone IGF Research 1999 9 52–60.[ISI][Medline]

    76. Camacho-Hubner C, Woods KA, Miraki-Moud F, Hindmarsh PC, Clark AJ, Hansson Y, Johnston A, Baxter RC & Savage MO. Effects of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) therapy on the growth hormone-IGF system of a patient with a partial IGF-I gene deletion. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1999 84 1611–1616.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    77. Hwa V, Little B, Adiyaman P, Kofoed EM, Pratt KL, Ocal G, Berberoglu M & Rosenfeld RG. Severe growth hormone insensitivity resulting from total absence of signal transducer and activator of transcription 5b. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2005 90 4260–4266.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    78. D’Ercole AJ, Ye P & O’Kusky JR. Mutant mouse models of insulin-like growth factor actions in the central nervous system. Neuropeptides 2002 36 209–220.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    79. Russo VC, Gluckman PD, Feldman EL & Werther GA. The insulin-like growth factor system and its pleiotropic functions in brain. Endocrine Reviews 2005 26 916–943.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    80. Kranzler JH, Rosenbloom AL, Martinez V & Guevara-Aguirre J. Normal intelligence with severe insulin-like growth factor I deficiency due to growth hormone receptor deficiency: a controlled study in a genetically homogeneous population. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1998 83 1953–1958.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    81. Cediel R, Riquelme R, Contreras J, Diaz A & Varela-Nieto I. Sensorineural hearing loss in insulin-like growth factor I-null mice: a new model of human deafness. European Journal of Neurosciences 2006 23 587–590.

    82. Camarero G, Avendano C, Fernandez-Moreno C, Villar A, Contreras J, de Pablo F, Pichel JG & Varela-Nieto I. Delayed inner ear maturation and neuronal loss in postnatal IGF-1-deficient mice. Journal of Neuroscience 2001 21 7630–7641.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    83. Bourla DH, Laron Z, Snir M, Lilos P, Weinberger D & Axer-Siegel R. Insulinlike growth factor I affects ocular development: a study of untreated and treated patients with Laron syndrome. Ophthalmology 2006 113 1197–1195.[ISI][Medline]

    84. Hellstrom A, Carlsson B, Niklasson A, Segnestam K, Boguszewski M, de Lacerda L, Savage M, Svensson E, Smith L, Weinberger D, Albertsson WK & Laron Z. IGF-I is critical for normal vascularization of the human retina. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2002 87 3413–3416.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    85. Hellstrom A, Engstrom E, Hard AL, Albertsson-Wikland K, Carlsson B, Niklasson A, Lofqvist C, Svensson E, Holm S, Ewald U, Holmstrom G & Smith LE. Postnatal serum insulin-like growth factor I deficiency is associated with retinopathy of prematurity and other complications of premature birth. Pediatrics 2003 112 1016–1020.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    86. Rosenbloom AL, Almonte AS, Brown MR, Fisher DA, Baumbach L & Parks JS. Clinical and biochemical phenotype of familial anterior hypopituitarism from mutation of the PROP1 gene. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1999 84 50–57.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    87. Diewert VM. Growth movements during prenatal development of human facial morphology. Progress in Clinical and Biological Research 1985 187 57–66.[Medline]

    88. Bikle D, Majumdar S, Laib A, Powell-Braxton L, Rosen C, Beamer W, Nauman E, Leary C & Halloran B. The skeletal structure of insulin-like growth factor I-deficient mice. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 2001 16 2320–2329.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    89. Yakar S, Bouxsein ML, Canalis E, Sun H, Glatt V, Gundberg C, Cohen P, Hwang D, Boisclair Y, LeRoith D & Rosen CJ. The ternary IGF complex influences postnatal bone acquisition and the skeletal response to intermittent parathyroid hormone. Journal of Endocrinology 2006 189 289–299.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    90. Mohan S, Richman C, Guo R, Amaar Y, Donahue LR, Wergedal J & Baylink DJ. Insulin-like growth factor regulates peak bone mineral density in mice by both growth hormone-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Endocrinology 2003 144 929–936.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    91. Kroger H, Vainio P, Nieminen J & Kotaniemi A. Comparison of different models for interpreting bone mineral density measurements using DXA and MRI technology. Bone 1995 17 157–159.[Medline]

    92. Benbassat CA, Eshed V, Kamjin M & Laron Z. Are adult patients with Laron syndrome osteopenic?, A comparison between dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and volumetric bone densities Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2003 88 4586–4589.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    93. Bachrach LK, Marcus R, Ott SM, Rosenbloom AL, Vasconez O, Martinez V, Martinez AL, Rosenfeld RG & Guevara-Aguirre J. Bone mineral, histomorphometry, and body composition in adults with growth hormone receptor deficiency. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 1998 13 415–421.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    94. Maheshwari HG, Bouillon R, Nijs J, Oganov VS, Bakulin AV & Baumann G. The Impact of congenital, severe, untreated growth hormone (GH) deficiency on bone size and density in young adults: insights from genetic GH-releasing hormone receptor deficiency. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2003 88 2614–2618.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    95. Woods KA, Camacho-Hubner C, Bergman RN, Barter D, Clark AJ & Savage MO. Effects of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) therapy on body composition and insulin resistance in IGF-I gene deletion. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2000 85 1407–1411.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    96. Domene HM, Bengolea SV, Jasper HG & Boisclair YR. Acid-labile subunit deficiency: phenotypic similarities and differences between human and mouse. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation 2005 28 43–46.[Medline]

    97. Randle PJ. Regulatory interactions between lipids and carbohydrates: the glucose fatty acid cycle after 35 years. Diabetes/Metabolism Reviews 1998 14 263–283.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    98. Ridderstrale M. Signaling mechanism for the insulin-like effects of growth hormone – another example of a classical hormonal negative feedback loop. Current Drug Targets. Immune Endocrine Metabolic Disorders 2005 5 79–92.

    99. Segerlantz M, Bramnert M, Manhem P, Laurila E & Groop LC. Inhibition of the rise in FFA by Acipimox partially prevents GH-induced insulin resistance in GH-deficient adults. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2001 86 5813–5818.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    100. Vickers MH, Hofman PL, Gluckman PD, Lobie PE & Cutfield WS. Combination therapy with acipimox enhances the effect of growth hormone treatment on linear body growth in the normal and small-for-gestational-age rat. American Journal of Physiology, Endocrinology and Metabolism 2006 291 E1212–E1219.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    101. Drake WM, Rowles SV, Roberts ME, Fode FK, Besser GM, Monson JP & Trainer PJ. Insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance improve in patients with acromegaly converted from depot octreotide to pegvisomant. European Journal of Endocrinology 2003 149 521–527.[Abstract]

    102. Dominici FP, Argentino DP, Munoz MC, Miquet JG, Sotelo AI & Turyn D. Influence of the crosstalk between growth hormone and insulin signalling on the modulation of insulin sensitivity. Growth Hormone and IGF Research 2005 15 324–336.[CrossRef]

    103. Sandhu MS, Heald AH, Gibson JM, Cruickshank JK, Dunger DB & Wareham NJ. Circulating concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I and development of glucose intolerance: a prospective observational study. Lancet 2002 359 1740–1745.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    104. Vaessen N, Heutink P, Janssen JA, Witteman JC, Testers L, Hofman A, Lamberts SW, Oostra BA, Pols HA & van Duijn CM. A polymorphism in the gene for IGF-I: functional properties and risk for type 2 diabetes and myocardial infarction. Diabetes 2001 50 637–642.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    105. Boulware SD, Tamborlane WV, Rennert NJ, Gesundheit N & Sherwin RS. Comparison of the metabolic effects of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin. Dose–response relationships in healthy young and middle-aged adults. Jouranl of Clinical Investigation 1994 93 1131–1139.

    106. Morrow LA, O’Brien MB, Moller DE, Flier JS & Moses AC. Recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-I therapy improves glycemic control and insulin action in the type A syndrome of severe insulin resistance. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1994 79 205–210.[Abstract]

    107. Carroll PV, Christ ER, Umpleby AM, Gowrie I, Jackson N, Bowes SB, Hovorka R, Croos P, Sonksen PH & Russell-Jones DL. IGF-I treatment in adults with type 1 diabetes: effects on glucose and protein metabolism in the fasting state and during a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic amino acid clamp. Diabetes 2000 49 789–796.[Abstract]

    108. Moses AC, Young SC, Morrow LA, O’Brien M & Clemmons DR. Recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I increases insulin sensitivity and improves glycemic control in type II diabetes. Diabetes 1996 45 91–100.[Abstract]

    109. Raile K, Klammt J, Schneider A, Keller A, Laue S, Smith R, Pfaffle R, Kratzsch J, Keller E & Kiess W. Clinical and functional characteristics of the human Arg59Ter insulin-like growth factor i receptor (IGF1R) mutation: implications for a gene dosage effect of the human IGF1R. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2006 91 2264–2271.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    110. Mauras N & Haymond MW. Are the metabolic effects of GH and IGF-I separable? Growth Hormone and IGF Research 2005