Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

DOI: 10.1530/eje.1.02346
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 156, Issue 4, 439-447
Copyright © 2007 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sathiavageeswaran, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wass, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sathiavageeswaran, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wass, J.
CLINICAL STUDY

Effects of GH on cognitive function in elderly patients with adult-onset GH deficiency: a placebo-controlled 12-month study

Mahesh Sathiavageeswaran, Pia Burman1, David Lawrence2, Alan G Harris3, Marina G Falleti4, Paul Maruff4 and John Wass

Department of Endocrinology, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LJ, UK, 1 Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital MAS, Malmö, Sweden, 2 Worldwide Endocrine Care, Pfizer Inc, New York, USA, 3 Department of Pharmacology and Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA and 4 CogState Ltd, Melbourne, Australia

(Correspondence should be addressed to J Wass; Email: john.wass{at}orh.nhs.uk)


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Objective: Young adults with childhood-onset GH deficiency (GHD) have reduced memory and attention, which can be improved by treatment with GH. Little information is available on cognitive function in elderly GHD patients.

Design: Single center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of 52-week duration.

Methods: Elderly GH therapy naïve GHD patients (n=34; age range 60–77 years) were enrolled and randomized to receive placebo or GH therapy which was titrated to achieve a target IGF-I level of +1 to +2 S.D. of the normal mean for age. Cognitive function was assessed at baseline and after 24 and 52 weeks, using a computerized psychometric test package (Neurobehavioral Examination System-2).

Results: The mean GH dose was 0.16±0.06 mg/day; mean IGF-I increased from 135±59 ng/ml at baseline to 213±77 ng/ml during active treatment. The GH-treated group had better mean serial digit learning scores compared with placebo group (P<0.05). Assessment of effect sizes showed that improvements in memory occurred with GH after 24 weeks. The overall adverse event rates were similar in the GH and the placebo group.

Conclusion: This study indicates that GH replacement may be accompanied by improvement in certain measures of cognitive function in elderly patients with GHD.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Organic growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) in the elderly is distinct from the decline in GH secretion associated with the aging process (1). Studies have demonstrated that elderly patients with GHD are both physically and psychologically less healthy than their age-matched peers (2–4). Relatively few studies have addressed the effects of GH replacement therapy in this population. In an open-label trial, treatment with lower doses of GH (0.15 and 0.3 mg/day) in 12 patients aged 61–86 years was well tolerated, whereas 25% developed adverse effects on a higher dose (0.5 mg/day) (5). Beneficial effects on body composition and quality of life were observed after 6 months. In a 6-month placebo-controlled trial with a 12-month open-label extension period, GH therapy was found to decrease fat mass, increase in lean body mass, and transiently increase maximal exercise capacity in 31 elderly GHD patients (6, 7). Likewise, positive effects on the waist to hip ratio and the lipid profile were found after GH replacement therapy for up to 3 years (8). Recently, long-term treatment with GH was found to also improve hand and leg muscle strength in elderly GHD patients (9). Data from a larger cohort of elderly GHD patients found that patients with GHD aged >65 years had similar baseline characteristics to younger adult GHD patients, while the effects of GH on body composition, lipids and quality of life as assessed by Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency Assessment (AGHDA) score (10) were also similar.

In younger patients with GHD, treatment with GH has been associated with either a neutral effect or improvements in measures of memory and attention. Factors associated with an improvement were the extent of cognitive impairments at baseline, the dose of GH administered and to some extent the age at onset of GHD (11). In GHD patients receiving GH, measures of cognitive functions were equivalent to those seen in matched controls (12).

In elderly healthy subjects, some aspects of cognitive function have been reported to be inversely related to serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) (10, 13), while regional cerebral blood flow during performance of a memory task was found to increase more in elderly healthy subjects with ‘high’ circulating IGF-I levels compared with a group with ‘low’ IGF-I levels (14).

Whether replacement therapy with GH in elderly patients with GHD can modify cognitive functions positively has not been addressed previously. In the present 12-month placebo-controlled study, we used a validated computerized battery of tests to assess cognitive and mood performance measures in older patients with adult-onset GHD who had not previously received GH therapy.


   Subjects and methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study design

This was a single center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group study of 52-week duration. Patients were assigned randomly on a 1:1 ratio to receive either recombinant human GH (Genotropin) or placebo administered via identical cartridges. GH therapy was begun at a dose of 0.1 mg/day and was titrated in 0.1 mg/day steps every 4 weeks. The decision to increase the dose of Genotropin/placebo was dependent on the levels of IGF-I and by the absence of adverse events. The target IGF-I level was between +1 and +2 SDS of the normal mean. IGF-I levels that were +2 SDS or more above the normal mean necessitated a reduction in administered GH dose. Assessment of IGF-I levels was performed at a central laboratory; all decisions on changes in GH dose were made by an independent physician who was not involved in the clinical care of the patients. To maintain other aspects of the blinding of the study, dose adjustments in the placebo group were performed using random assignment to one of the four dose titration schedules by the independent physician. The protocol was approved by the ethics committee at the Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.

Patients

Included in the study were male or female patients aged 60–80 years with adult-onset GHD of at least 24 months occurring in combination with at least one other pituitary hormone insufficiency (except prolactin). GHD and other pituitary hormonal hypofunction had to be established on the basis of an insulin tolerance test (ITT); if not tolerated, an arginine stimulation test. GHD was defined as a peak GH at ITT (or arginine stimulation test) of <3 µg/l (<6 mU/l). Test results performed within the previous 5 years were accepted. Other hormone replacement therapy (HRT) had to be at a stable dose for at least 3 months prior to start of the study; however, dose adjustments of vasopressin were allowed. Patients provided informed written consent and had to be able to comply with the medication regime of self-administered daily injections during the treatment period.

Exclusion criteria included previous treatment with GH, any acute severe illness that could affect cognitive function during the previous 3 months, any psychiatric disease (including a history of drug/alcohol abuse) and uncontrolled endocrine disorders (including diabetes mellitus) other than GHD. Chronic medication with prednisolone at doses >10 mg/day (or other per oral glucocorticoids at equivalent doses) was not permitted. Patients with chronic severe liver disease (aspartate transaminase or alanine transaminase more than three times the upper limit of normal), chronic severe renal disease (creatinine >150 µM, hematuria or proteinuria), NYHA class III–IV congestive heart failure, clinically significant aortic stenosis, hypertrophic car-diomyopathy or uncontrolled hypertension (diastolic blood pressure >105 mmHg) were not included. Patients with a history of malignancy (except of basal cell carcinoma) were excluded. Patients treated for cranial tumors or leukaemia causing GHD and those with residual pituitary masses following surgery were eligible. Those with a known or suspected allergy to GH or any of its constituents or patients that had received any investigational medication or device within the past 3 months prior to enrollment were excluded. Non-compliance was defined as subjects who missed >25% of the injections or if there was a period of >20 consecutive days without treatment preceding the evaluation visits, the subject was excluded from the efficacy evaluation per protocol analysis and were included in the safety and intent to treat populations.

Psychometric measures

Cognitive function was assessed in the study using the Neurobehavioral Examination System (NES-2) test battery (15, 16) at weeks 0, 24, and 52 (or at early termination). Habituation tests were done at weeks 1 and 51. Mood was assessed using the profile of mood states. To enhance the test situation, the test was performed against a background of a tape playing sounds from daily life activities that could be perceived as disturbing. In addition, the tests were performed at noon after an overnight fasting.

The NES-2 assessed the following eight distinct aspects of cognitive function:

Continuous performance  This test measured sustained attention. One letter was presented on the screen per second for 5 min, and the subject was instructed to press a key whenever a pre-determined target letter appeared. The performance measure was the sum of the number of misses (non-responses) and false alarms (responses to non-targets) during the test.

Symbol digit substitution  This test measured coding speed. Nine symbols and nine digits were paired in a ‘key’ at the top of the screen, and the subject was required to press the digits on the keyboard corresponding to a test set of the nine symbols presented in a scrambled order. The performance measures were the response latency for each of the nine items in the trial and the number of errors (digits matched incorrectly with the test symbols).

Pattern memory  This test measured visual memory. A pattern of filled cells in a 10x10 matrix was displayed for 4 s, and after a 3-s blank screen retention interval, three patterns were presented. The subject is required to select the pattern that had been presented earlier. The performance measure was the number of trials correct out of 25.

Serial digit learning  This test measured learning and memory. A long sequence of single digits was presented one at a time, and the subject was asked to recall as many of the digits as possible. The same sequence of digits was presented again until either the subject recalled the entire sequence correctly for two trials in a row or a maximum number of trials was reached. The performance measure was the error score, i.e. the sum of errors over all the trials attempted.

Digit span  This test measured short-term memory. A series of digits is presented, with immediate typed recall required in the original order of presentation (forward test) or in the reverse order of presentation (backward test). The sequence increased until the subject was incorrect on two consecutive trials with a given sequence length. The performance measure was the maximum number of digits recalled in the correct sequence.

Associate learning and associate recall  These tests measured learning and intermediate memory respectively. Nine pairs of first names and respective occupations were shown for 2 s each, followed by the display of the name and all alternative occupations. Subjects were required to indicate which occupation was associated with each name. The performance measure was the sum of the correct responses across three trials with the same pairs.

Colour word  Presentation of one of the four words: green, yellow, red, or blue. Each word was printed in the colour corresponding to the meaning of the word (i.e. the word ‘red’ printed in red) or in one of the other three colours not corresponding to the meaning of the word (i.e. the word ‘red’ printed in yellow, etc.). The subject was asked to respond to the stimuli which were shown for 2 s each to depress a key to indicate whether the meaning of the presented word corresponded to the colour of the print. The 16 possible colour–word combinations were randomly distributed within each sequence of 16 stimuli. The performance measure was the number of errors.

The profile of mood states  This required subjects to answer a 25-item questionnaire in which they are asked to rate their level of tension, depression, anger, fatigue and confusion on a scale of 1–5 on five different items for each descriptor (17). Performance measures are the summed ratings on the five items for each mood descriptor.

The trail making test (TMT)  TMT is given in two parts, A and B. The subject must first draw lines to connect 25 consecutively numbered circles that are arranged in a random visual array on a single sheet of paper (part A). Part B requires the subject to connect the same number of consecutively numbered and lettered circles on another worksheet by alternating between the two sequences. The sequence must follow alphanumeric order. The subject is urged to connect the circles as fast as possible without lifting the pencil from the paper. Both parts of the TMT require motor speed and coordination, attention, mental, or cognitive flexibility and are conducted under the supervision of an operator (18).

The baseline performance of the NES and TMT was compared with published norms for age (15, 19) and indicated a suboptimal cognition of the patients in the present study.

Biochemical analyses

At screening and again at weeks 24 and 52, patients underwent blood testing for haematology and clinical chemistry (liver and renal functions). Biochemical markers were also assessed at these time points and included serum testosterone, oestrogen, prolactin, thyroid-stimulating hormone, free T4 and T3. At randomization and again at weeks 12, 24, and 52, patients also underwent haematology and biochemical testing that included IGF-I, fasting glucose, insulin and HbA1c. For IGF-I measurements, an acid/ethanol extraction IRMA IGF-I assay from Diagnostic Systems Laboratories was used (sensitivity 0.80 ng/ml). The intra-assay coefficient of variability (CV) were the following: 3.4% at 9.4 ng/ml IGF-I, 3.0% at 55.4 ng/ml, and 1.5% at 263.6 ng/ml. The intra-assay CV values for the IGF-I assay were 8.2% at 10.4 ng/ml, 1.5% at 53.8 ng/ml and 3.7% at 255.9 ng/ml.

Statistical analyses

A test for treatment effect with respect to change from baseline in IGF-I was performed at 24 and 52 weeks, where the model included two factors (treatment and gender), with baseline IGF-I as a covariate. For fasting glucose, HbA1c and insulin, Van Elteren’s test was performed to evaluate a potential treatment effect with respect to change from baseline in each response at 24 and 52 weeks, stratifying for gender and baseline response. Each test utilized an individual 5% level of significance.

The performance measures from the psychometric and mood assessments were compared between the placebo and the GH groups at each time point using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) in which baseline performance was treated as the covariate. In three cases, pre-baseline values were used to increase the sample size. Where ANCOVA was significant, the data for the assessment were compared with baseline using matched-pairs t-tests. For all performance measures, scores at each assessment were compared with baseline and expressed as an effect size. An effect was classified as being significant if the probability of occurring by chance was <0.05 (i.e. type I error rate 5%). A measure of effect size was also computed for the difference from the baseline at the 24- and 52-week assessment for each performance measure.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Patient population

A total of 34 patients (22 males and 12 females) met the criteria for inclusion in the study. The mean age of the patients was 66 years (range 60–77 years). Sixteen patients (five females) were assigned to the GH arm and 18 patients (seven females) to the placebo arm. Thirty patients completed the study. One patient (female) withdrew from the trial after randomization without providing a reason for discontinuation. One patient (male) emigrated after participating in the study for 35 weeks. One patient (male) died of unrelated causes during the course of the trial period. One patient (male) withdrew from the trial due to an adverse event (liposarcoma). The patient characteristics are shown in Table 1Go. All patients were euthyroid during the study duration. Men with gonadal hormone insufficiency were on replacement therapy with testosterone, whereas most women with oestrogen deficiency did not receive hormone replacement therapy.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1 Demographic data and disease characteristics of the study population. D, hormone deficiency; N, normal; NFA, non-functioning pituitary adenoma.
 
GH dose and IGF-I

The mean±S.D. dose of GH was 0.16±0.08 mg/day (range 0.10–0.30 mg/day) and was numerically higher in women as compared with men (0.22±0.08 vs 0.14±0.07; P=0.058). After treatment with GH for 6 and 12 months, IGF-I levels were increased by GH, but not by placebo, compared with baseline (6 months, {Delta}IGF-I+88±50 (GH) vs –17±67 µg/l (placebo) and 12 months, {Delta}IGF-I+88±72 (GH) vs –31±47 µg/l (placebo); P<0.001). Women had lower IGF-I levels than men at baseline (116±79 vs 182±82 µg/l respectively; P=0.03); at the end of the study, IGF-I increased significantly by GH in both sexes, and to similar levels in men and women (185±108 vs 229 ± 56 µg/l; P=0.50).

Cognition and mood

Table 2Go shows the mean performance for each cognitive and mood measure in the placebo and GH groups during the study period. Of the 34 patients, 17 had been treated with radiotherapy for their pituitary tumours. These patients were evenly assigned to the GH and the placebo group respectively. We did not detect an effect of radiotherapy on the baseline cognitive function. At the 6-month assessment, there were improvements from baseline in the GH group for the digit learning test. The analysis of effect sizes reflecting change in performance at 6 months is shown in Fig. 1Go. Compared with placebo, GH therapy was associated with small improvements (d=~0.2) in cognition; the differences between the GH and the control groups were due to both a decline in performance in the placebo group as well as an improvement in the GH group. For the 12-month assessment, no significant benefits of GH were found. There were no significant changes of the mood measures during the study.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2 Cognitive and mood outcome measures during the study period in the groups treated with growth hormone (GH) and placebo.
 

Figure 1
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 1 Differences in performance between the GH and the placebo groups for each measure of cognitive function at 24 weeks, *P<0.05. DL err, serial digit learning (error); DS fwd, digit span (forward); DS bwd, digit span (backward); Arc, associate learning (recall); CPT_err, continuous performance; Sd_err, symbol digit (errors); Sd-lat, symbol digit (latency); PM_corr, pattern memory; Alc, associate learning; Cw_corr, colour word; TMT-A, trail making test, version A; TMT-B, trail making test, version B.

 
Safety parameters

Similar levels were seen in the GH and placebo groups fasting glucose (4.9±0.7 vs 4.5±0.8 mmol/l), insulin (56±18 vs 50+22 pmol/l), and HbA1c (5.9±0.7 vs 5.8±0.5%) at baseline. After treatment, there were no significant differences between the GH and the placebo groups in terms of the changes from baseline for any of these parameters. The overall adverse event rates were similar in the GH and the placebo groups. One patient in the GH group died of an unrelated cause (acute bronchopneumonia) during the study. Another patient in the GH group was noted to have a suspected neoplasm on the left thigh on day 168 of treatment and was discontinued immediately. This was later diagnosed as a liposarcoma, the causality of which was undetermined. Two patients in the placebo group developed atrial fibrillation and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia during the study and subsequently underwent permanent pacemaker insertion. No clinically relevant effects were seen in either group in terms of vital signs, full blood count, renal or liver biochemistry (Fig. 2Go).


Figure 2
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 2 Differences in performance between the GH and the placebo groups for each measure of cognitive function at 52 weeks. DL err, serial digit learning (error); DS fwd, digit span (forward); DS bwd, digit span (backward); Arc, associate learning (recall); CPT_err, continuous performance; Sd_err, symbol digit (errors); Sd-lat, symbol digit (latency); PM_corr, pattern memory; Alc, associate learning; Cw_corr, color word; TMT-A, trail making test, version A; TMT-B, trail making test, version B.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
This is the first controlled study of the effects of GH on cognition in elderly patients with GHD. The beneficial effects on cognition that occurred with GH therapy were discrete. Fewer subjects than anticipated were enrolled, which reflects the difficulty in identifying patients with sufficiently severe GHD at baseline that had not previously received replacement therapy. This may have introduced a potential selection bias in favour of patients with minor cognitive deficits at baseline, and relatively little scope for improvement, since those with more marked symptoms are likely to have previously qualified for treatment. These aspects may have contributed to the relatively small effects observed.

In young adults with childhood-onset GHD, existing data argue for reduced memory and, possibly, reduced attention (20–22). In patients with adult-onset GHD, the data are less consistent; the presence/severity of cognitive deficits seems to be determined by underlying cause and its treatment (23–25). Subjects with large tumours, such as craniopharyngiomas requiring trans-frontal surgery, have lower cognitive function than subjects requiring medical treatment only. However, suboptimal cognition has been found also in patients who had not been treated with surgery or radiotherapy (23), raising the possibility that hormonal abnormalities per se could be responsible. Another aspect for consideration is the duration of GHD, which is generally longer in patients with childhood-onset disease. The severity of GHD may also be more profound in young adults under the existing definition of GHD. However, elderly GHD patients also seem to have lower scores of psychological function as compared with their healthy peers reporting less energy and personal life fulfillment (3).

There are receptors for GH in many areas of the brain, including the hippocampus (26), a region associated with memory and learning processes. The binding sites for GH in the brain are particularly abundant in the choroid plexus (27). When administered subcutaneously, GH can cross the blood–brain barrier and influence cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of neurotransmitters, such as dopamine and aspartate (28). The importance of dopamine to attentional function is unequivocal (29), whereas aspartate is a ligand for the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor that has been shown to have a role in the development of long-term memory in hippocampal cells (30). Subcutaneous injection of GH to rats induced an upregulation of the hippocampal GH receptor transcripts, which positively correlated to an increase in the NR2b gene transcript (31). Interestingly, overexpression of the NMDA receptor subunit NR2b in the forebrain of transgenic mice has been shown to enhance cognitive capabilities (32).

Relatively few clinical data on the effect of treatment with GH on cognition have been reported. Positive effects were observed in four open studies on a limited number of patients (14, 33–35). The study by Golgeli et al. used a neurophysiologic test, P300 event-related potential (ERP) latencies as detected by EEG, and found abnormally prolonged latencies in women with GHD as a consequence of Sheehan’s syndrome (33). Similar EEG findings have been reported in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (36) and in patients with depression (37). After 6 months of treatment with GH in women with GHD, ERP latencies were normalized, which the investigators interpreted as an improvement of the evaluation process (33). In addition to the open-label studies on GH and cognition, four placebo-controlled studies have addressed this topic (38–41). In two studies where deficits were present at baseline (38, 39), improvements of attention and memory were reported. On the other hand, GH did not enhance cognitive functions in patients with no known prior impairments (40, 41). The outcome was also dependent on the administered dose of GH and the duration of treatment, whereas age at onset of GHD did not seem to be a strong determinant, since positive and neutral effects were reported in both childhood- and adult-onset diseases.

Today, it is well recognized that men and women respond differently to GH treatment, with women requiring a higher dose of GH (42–45). The mechanism is not fully understood but has been attributed to circulating levels of oestrogens and in particular the hepatic concentrations of oestradiol (46), which possibly inhibit GH signaling by suppressing GH-induced JAK2 phosphorylation (47). Since a difference in dose requirements was also observed in these elderly patients in the absence of treatment with HRT in the women, it is unlikely that oestradiol concentrations is the only explanation for a gender difference in GH responsiveness, in particular as circulating oestradiol in the elderly is higher in the men (48). When treating elderly patients with GH, the different dose requirements should be considered in order to optimize treatment in all patients.

In the present study, benefits of GH treatment observed for the cognitive measures occurred because some aspects of cognitive function improved over the year in the GH therapy group while the placebo group deteriorated. The findings provide a basis for further studies with an emphasis on patients with severe cognitive impairment at baseline.


   Acknowledgements
 
This study was supported by Pfizer, Inc.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

    1. Toogood AA, O’Neill PA & Shalet SM. Beyond the somatopause: growth hormone deficiency in adults over the age of 60 years. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1996 81 460–465.[Abstract]

    2. Toogood AA, Adams JE, O’Neill PA & Shalet SM. Body composition in growth hormone deficient adults over the age of 60 years. Clinical Endocrinology 1996 45 399–405.[CrossRef][Medline]

    3. Li Voon Chong JS, Groves T, Foy P, Wallymahmed ME & MacFarlane IA. Elderly people with hypothalamic–pituitary disease and untreated GH deficiency: clinical outcome, body composition, lipid profiles and quality of life after 2 years compared to controls. Clinical Endocrinology 2002 56 175–181.[Medline]

    4. Rosilio M, Blum WF, Edwards DJ, Shavrikova EP, Valle D, Lamberts SWJ, Erfurth EM, Webb SM, Ross RJ, Chihara K, Henrich G, Herschbach P & Attanasio AF. Long-term improvement of quality of life during growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy in adults with GH deficiency, as measured by questions on life satisfaction-hypopituitarism (QLS-H). Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2004 89 1684–1693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    5. Toogood AA & Shalet SM. Growth hormone replacement therapy in the elderly with hypothalamic–pituitary disease: a dose-finding study. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1999 84 131–136.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    6. Fernholm R, Bramnert M, Hagg E, Hilding A, Baylink DJ, Mohan S & Thoren M. Growth hormone replacement therapy improves body composition and increases bone metabolism in elderly patients with pituitary disease. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2000 85 4104–4112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    7. Elgzyri T, Castenfors J, Hagg E, Backman C, Thoren M & Bramnert M. The effects of GH replacement therapy on cardiac morphology and function, exercise capacity and serum lipids in elderly patients with GH deficiency. Clinical Endocrinology 2004 61 113–122.[CrossRef][Medline]

    8. Attanasio AF, Bates PC, Ho KY, Webb SM, Ross RR, Strasburger CJ, Bouillon R, Crowe B, Selander K, Valle D & Lamberts SWJ on behalf of the Hypopituitary Control and Complications Study International Advisory Board. Human growth hormone replacement in adult hypopituitary patients: long-term effects on body composition and lipid 19 status – 3 year results from the HypoCCs database. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2002 87 1600–1606.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    9. Gotherstrom G, Bengtsson BA, Sunnerhagen KS, Johannsson G & Svensson J. The effects of five-year growth hormone replacement therapy on muscle strength in elderly hypopituitary patients. Clinical Endocrinology 2005 62 105–113.[CrossRef][Medline]

    10. Aleman A, Verhaar HJ, de Haan EH, de Vries WR, Samson MM, Drent ML, van der Veen EA & Koppeschaar HP. Insulin-like growth factor-I and cognitive function in healthy older men. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1999 84 471–475.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    11. Burman P & Deijen JB. Quality of life and cognitive function in patients with pituitary insufficiency. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 1998 67 154–167.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    12. Maruff P & Falleti M. Cognitive function in growth hormone deficiency and growth hormone replacement. Hormone Research 2005 64 100–108.[ISI][Medline]

    13. van Dam PS & Aleman A. Insulin-like growth factor-I, cognition and brain aging. European Journal of Pharmacology 2004 490 87–95.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    14. Arwert LI, Deijen JB, Muller M & Drent ML. Long-term growth hormone treatment preserves GH-induced memory and mood improvements: a 10-year follow-up study in GH deficient adult men. Hormones and Behavior 2005 47 343–349.[Medline]

    15. Emmen HH, Hogendijk EMG, Hooisma J, Orlebeke JF & Uijtdehaage SHJ. Adaptation of two Standardized International Test Batteries for Use in The Netherlands for Detection of Exposure to Neurotoxic Compounds Rijswijk: Medisch Biologisch Laboratorium, TNO, 1988. The Netherlands.

    16. White RF, Diamond R, Krengel M, Lindem K, Feldman RG, Eisen E & Wegman D. Validation of the NES2 in patients with neurologic disorders. Neurotoxicology and Teratology 1996 18 441–448.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    17. McNair DM, Lorr M & Droppleman LF. Manual Profile of Mood States San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service, 1981.

    18. Greenlife CL, Margolis RB & Erker GJ. Application of the trail making test in differentiating neuropsychological impairment of elderly persons. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1985 61 1283–1289.[ISI][Medline]

    19. Tombaugh TN. Trail making test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2004 19 203–214.[ISI][Medline]

    20. Deijen JB, de Boer H, Blok GJ & van der Veen EA. Cognitive impairments and mood disturbances in growth hormone deficient men. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1996 21 313–322.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    21. Lijffijt M, van Dam PS, Kenemans JL, Koppeschaar HP, de Vries WR, Drent ML, Wittenberg A & Kemner C. Somatotropic-axis deficiency affects brain substrates of selective attention in childhood-onset growth hormone deficient patients. Neuroscience Letters 2003 353 123–126.[ISI][Medline]

    22. van Dam PS. Neurocognitive function in adults with growth hormone deficiency. Hormone Research 2005 64 109–114.

    23. Peace KA, Orme SM, Padayatty SJ, Godfrey HP & Belchetz PE. Cognitive dysfunction in patients with pituitary tumour who have been treated with transfrontal or transsphenoidal surgery or medication. Clinical Endocrinology 1998 49 391–396.[CrossRef][Medline]

    24. Baum HB, Katznelson L, Sherman JC, Biller BM, Hayden DL, Schoenfeld DA, Cannistraro KE & Klibanski A. Effects of physiological growth hormone (GH) therapy on cognition and quality of life in patients with adult-onset GH deficiency. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1998 83 3184–3189.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    25. Bulow B, Hagmar L, Orbaek P, Osterberg K & Erfurth EM. High incidence of mental disorders, reduced mental well-being and cognitive function in hypopituitary women with GH deficiency treated for pituitary disease. Clinical Endocrinology 2002 56 183–193.[CrossRef][Medline]

    26. Thornwall-Le Greves M, Zhou Q, Lagerholm S, Huang W, Le Greves P & Nyberg F. Morphine decreases the levels of the gene transcripts of growth hormone receptor and growth hormone binding protein in the male rat hippocampus and spinal cord. Neuroscience Letters 2001 304 69–72.[ISI][Medline]

    27. Lai ZN, Emtner M, Roos P & Nyberg F. Characterization of putative growth hormone receptors in human choroid plexus. Brain Research 1991 546 222–226.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    28. Burman P, Hetta J, Wide L, Mansson JE, Ekman R & Karlsson FA. Growth hormone treatment affects brain neurotransmitters and thyroxine. Clinical Endocrinology 1996 44 319–324.[CrossRef][Medline]

    29. Remy P & Samson Y. The role of dopamine in cognition: evidence from functional imaging studies. Current Opinion in Neurology 2003 16 S37–S41.

    30. Gardner D. Synaptic transmission. In Neuroscience in Medicine, pp 75–114. Ed. PM Conn, Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company, 1995.

    31. Le Greves M, Steensland P, Le Greves P & Nyberg F. Growth hormone induces age-dependent alteration in the expression of hippocampal growth hormone receptor and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunits gene transcripts in male rats. PNAS 2002 99 7119–7123.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    32. Tang YP, Shimizu E, Dube GR, Rampon C, Kerchner GA, Zhuo M, Liu G & Tsien JZ. Genetic enhancement of learning and memory in mice. Nature 1999 401 63–69.[CrossRef][Medline]

    33. Golgeli A, Tanriverdi F, Suer C, Gokce C, Ozesmi C, Bayram F & Kelestimur F. Utility of P300 auditory event related potential latency in detecting cognitive dysfunction in growth hormone (GH) deficient patients with Sheehan’s syndrome and effects of GH replacement therapy. European Journal of Endocrinology 2004 150 153–159.[Abstract]

    34. Almqvist O, Thoren M, Saaf M & Eriksson O. Effects of growth hormone substitution on mental performance in adults with growth hormone deficiency: a pilot study. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1986 11 347–352.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    35. Sartorio A, Molinari E, Riva G, Conti A, Morabito F & Faglia G. Growth hormone treatment in adults with childhood onset growth hormone deficiency: effects on psychological capabilities. Hormone Research 1995 44 6–11.[ISI][Medline]

    36. Hirata K, Hozumi A, Tanaka H, Kubo J, Zeng XH, Yamazaki K, Asahi K & Nakano T. Abnormal information processing in dementia of Alzheimer type. A study using the event-related potential’s field. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 2000 250 152–155.[ISI][Medline]

    37. Cavanagh J & Geisler MW. Mood effects on the ERP processing of emotional intensity in faces: a P3 investigation with depressed students. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2006 60 27–33.[ISI][Medline]

    38. Deijen JB, de Boer H & van der Veen EA. Cognitive changes during growth hormone replacement in adult men. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1998 23 45–55.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    39. Oertel H, Schneider HJ, Stalla GK, Holsboer F & Zihl J. The effect of growth hormone substitution on cognitive performance in adult patients with hypopituitarism. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2004 29 839–850.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    40. Degerblad M, Almkvist O, Grunditz R, Hall K, Kaijser L, Knutsson E, Ringertz H & Thoren M. Physical and psychological capabilities during substitution therapy with recombinant growth hormone in adults with growth hormone deficiency. Acta Endocrinologica 1990 123 185–193.[Medline]

    41. Baum HB, Katznelson L, Sherman JC, Biller BM, Hayden DL, Schoenfeld DA, Cannistraro KE & Klibanski A. Effects of physiological growth hormone (GH) therapy on cognition and quality of life in patients with adult-onset GH deficiency. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1998 83 3184–3189.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    42. Burman P, Johansson AG, Siegbahn A, Vessby B & Karlsson FA. Growth hormone (GH)-deficient men are more responsive to GH replacement therapy than women. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1997 82 550–555.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    43. Johansson AG, Engstrom BE, Ljunghall S, Karlsson FA & Burman P. Gender differences in the effects of long term growth hormone (GH) treatment on bone in adults with GH deficiency. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1999 84 2002–2007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    44. Cook DM, Ludlam WH & Cook MB. Route of estrogen administration helps to determine growth hormone (GH) replacement dose in GH-deficient adults. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1999 84 3956–3960.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    45. Drake WM, Coyte D, Camacho-Hubner C, Jivanji NM, Kaltsas G, Wood DF, Trainer PJ, Grossman AB, Besser GM & Monson JP. Optimizing growth hormone replacement therapy by dose titration in hypopituitary adults. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1998 83 3913–3919.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    46. Janssen YJ, Helmerhorst F, Frolich M & Roelfsema F. A switch from oral (2 mg/day) to transdermal (50 microg/day) 17beta-estradiol therapy increases serum insulin-like growth factor-I levels in recombinant human growth hormone (GH)-substituted women with GH deficiency. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2000 85 464–467.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    47. Leung KC, Doyle N, Ballesteros M, Sjogren K, Watts CK, Low TH, Leong GM, Ross RJ & Ho KK. Estrogen inhibits GH signaling by suppressing GH-induced JAK2 phosphorylation, an effect mediated by SOCS-2. PNAS 2003 100 1016–1021.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    48. Eden Engstrom B, Karlsson FA, Naessen T, Gillberg P & Wide L. Ambulatory morning growth hormone concentrations increase in men and decrease in women with age. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation 2002 62 25–31.[ISI][Medline]

Received 10 July 2006
Accepted 16 January 2007





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sathiavageeswaran, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wass, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sathiavageeswaran, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wass, J.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS