|
|
||||||||
CLINICAL STUDY |
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases C4-R, Leiden University Medical Center, Po Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands and 1 University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
(Correspondence should be addressed to A A van der Klaauw; Email: a.a.van_der_klaauw{at}lumc.nl)
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients and methods: After 2, 5, and 7 years of rhGH replacement, 63 adult GHD patients (30 men, 52 adult-onset GHD) were assessed. IGF-I increased during rhGH replacement, and a stable dose of rhGH was reached within 1 year of rhGH substitution. Thereafter, this individualized dose was continued.
Results: Plasma levels of total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased even after 5 years of rhGH replacement (11% decrease, P < 0.001; 22% decrease, P < 0.001 respectively). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels increased during 7 years of rhGH replacement (1.4 ± 0.5 mmol/l at baseline vs 1.7 ± 0.5 mmol/l after 7 years, P < 0.001), whereas triglyceride concentrations remained unchanged. Fasting glucose levels increased during follow-up, mainly during the first 2 years of rhGH replacement (4.4 ± 0.7 mmol/l to 5.0 ± 1.0 mmol/l, P < 0.001). Body mass index increased during follow-up, whereas waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio remained unchanged. Diastolic blood pressure decreased (P = 0.002), but when patients using antihypertensive medication were excluded this decrease did not reach significance (P = 0.064). Systolic blood pressure remained unchanged.
Conclusion: The beneficial effects of rhGH replacement, described after short-term rhGH replacement, are sustained in the long term up to 7 years.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Götherström et al. reported results of 5 years of rhGH replacement in 118 patients, and documented decreases in TC, LDL cholesterol, TG, glycosylated hemoglobin, and body fat, and increases in HDL cholesterol and lean body mass (3). However, only three small studies have reported a follow-up duration of more than 5 years (maximum number of 12 patients, summarized in Table 3
(46)). To determine whether the beneficial effects of rhGH treatment are sustained in the long term in a larger cohort, we evaluated the effects of 7 years rhGH replacement on biochemical parameters and anthropometric parameters in our cohort of GHD adults.
|
| Subjects and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We prospectively enrolled 88 consecutive patients with GHD (Table 1
). After the initiation of treatment, 20 patients discontinued after a mean duration of rhGH treatment of 3.2 years (range 0.76.3 years), 2 patients died (acute cardiac arrest and acute stroke), and 3 were lost to follow-up (Fig. 1
). Sixty-three patients completed 7 years of rhGH replacement. Baseline characteristics of the patients who did not complete the study did not differ from the patients who completed the study (gender/age/body mass index (BMI)/age at onset of GHD/etiological diagnosis/surgery/radiotherapy/pituitary deficiencies). Biochemical and anthropometric efficacy parameters were studied in these 63 patients who completed the 7 years of rhGH replacement. During follow-up, 1 patient, a 29-year-old male, with idiopathic GHD and a BMI of 37.5 kg/m2 developed diabetes 7 years after the start of rhGH replacement. Biochemical and anthropometric efficacy parameters were studied separately in seven patients who stopped after completion of 2 years of rhGH replacement and in five patients who stopped after completion of 5 years of rhGH replacement (eight patients dropped out before the first efficacy evaluation). There were no differences in responses to rhGH replacement for any of the efficacy parameters between the seven patients who stopped after 2 years and the patients who continued after 2 years. The response to rhGH replacement during 5 years was also the same for the five patients who stopped after 5 years and patients who continued after 5 years.
|
|
Prior to the start of rhGH treatment, the diagnosis of GHD was established by a peak GH concentration < 3 µg/l during an insulin tolerance test (nadir blood glucose < 2.2 mmol). Patients were then prospectively enrolled in an open-label treatment protocol.
All patients were treated with s.c. injections of rhGH (Genotropin Pharmacia/Pfizer, Zomacton Ferring, or Norditropin NovoNordisk, Humatrope Lilly), given every evening. The initial dose of rhGH was 0.2 mg/day, which was individually adjusted each month in the first half year to achieve serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentrations within the age-dependent laboratory reference range, aimed at SDS between 0 and + 2. Thereafter, this individualized dose was continued for the duration of the study (see Fig. 2
).
|
When secondary amenorrhea was present for more than 1 year, premenopausal women were defined as being luteinizing hormone (LH)/follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) deficient. In men, LH/FSH deficiency was defined by a testosterone level below the reference range (8.0 nmol/l). Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) deficiency was defined as total thyroxine (T4) or free T4 level below the reference range. Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) deficiency was defined as an insufficient increase in cortisol levels (absolute value < 0.55 µmol/l) after a corticotropin-releasing hormone stimulation test or the insulin tolerance test. Patients received replacement therapy with hydrocortisone, L-T4, testosterone in men, and/or estrogen (15 females on oral estrogen replacement therapy and 2 on transder-mal estrogens) in combination with prostagens in premenopausal women only. There were 17 premeno-pausal women and 17 postmenopausal women. Substitution therapy was monitored during replacement with rhGH and the respective dosages were adjusted as required. Thyroid hormone replacement dosing was started with 0.1 µg/day and dose titration was based on clinical response and serum free T4 concentrations within the reference range. In all patients with childhood-onset GHD, rhGH replacement was stopped for at least 3 months prior to retesting GH reserve, applying adult cut-off values.
Patients were treated with lipid-lowering medication and antihypertensive medication according to the discretion of their attending physicians. Two patients were already treated with lipid-lowering drugs at baseline and in seven additional patients, lipid-lowering drugs treatment was initiated during follow-up. All patients used statins. Four patients were already treated with antihypertensive medication at baseline and in seven additional patients antihypertensive treatment was initiated during follow-up. The antihypertensive medication consisted of diuretics, ß-adrenoreceptor blockage drugs, calcium-antagonists, angiotensin-coverting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin type II receptor antagonist and central acting antihypertensive medication, and combinations thereof.
Efficacy parameters
The following efficacy parameters were assessed before the start, and after 2, 5, and 7 years of rhGH replacement:
Assays
At baseline, during the first year, and at 2 and 5 years serum IGF-I (nmol/l) concentration was measured by RIA (INCSTAR Corp., Stillwater, MN, USA) after extraction and purification on octadecasilyl-silica columns. The detection limit of this assay is 1.5 nmol/l, and the inter-assay coefficient of variation was below 11%.
During the last 2 years of the study, a new assay was introduced. The serum IGF-I concentration (nano-grams/milliliter) was measured using an immunometric technique on an Advantage Chemiluminescense System (Nichols Institute Diagnostics, San Juan Capistrano, CA, USA). The lower limit of detection was 6.0 ng/ml and intra-assay variation (n = 250) was 8.0 and 6.0% at mean plasma levels of 30 and 450 ng/ml respectively. Inter-assay variation was 8.7, 5.8, and 6.5% at mean IGF-I plasma levels of 33, 174, and 445 ng/l respectively (n = 115). The concentrations were converted to SI units by dividing by 7.65.
A Hitachi 747 autoanalyzer (Roche) was used to quantify serum concentrations of glucose, TC, and TG. HDL cholesterol was measured with a homogenous enzymatic assay (Hitachi 911, Roche). In 2003, the Hitachi 747 was replaced by a modular P 800 with no change in the chemistry components.
Statistics
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows, version 12.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results are scored as the mean ± S.D., unless specified otherwise. Independent samples t-tests and ANOVA repeated measurements with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons were used, when appropriate. Logarithmic transformation of the data was used to limit dispersion of the variance. P value < 0.05 was assumed to represent a significant difference.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Since a subset of the patients (9/63 = 14%) were on lipid-lowering medication at any time point during follow-up, the data are also analyzed for the cohort free of lipid-lowering medication at any time point. The pattern of change remained unaffected for TC, HDL cholesterol, and TG. For LDL cholesterol, the decrease became significant only after 5 years, and continued to decrease thereafter. In those patients using lipid-lowering medication, the degree of change for TC was significantly greater compared with those who were not (0.2 ± 0.1 mmol/l vs 0.1 ± 0.1 mmol/l respectively, P = 0.007).
BMI significantly increased by 6% (P < 0.001, Table 2
), mainly due to an increase between 2 and 5 years (Fig. 4
). Waist circumference and WH ratio remained unchanged (Table 2
). SBP did not change during follow-up (Table 2
, Fig. 4
). Exclusion of the patients using antihypertensive medication (n = 11) did not affect the conclusions. DBP decreased during follow-up in all patients (P = 0.002, Table 2
), but this decrease failed to reach statistical significance when patients using antihypertensive medication were excluded (P = 0.064).
|
The dose of rhGH was significantly higher in women compared with men at all time points. At the 2 years evaluation, men used 0.42 ± 0.9 mg and women 0.60 ± 0.22 mg (P = 0.002). At 5 years the doses were 0.42 ± 0.10 and 0.66 ± 0.26 mg (P < 0.001) and at 7 years 0.36 ± 0.10 and 0.66 ± 0.26 mg (P < 0.001) respectively. We found no differences in treatment effects of any of the biochemical and anthropometric parameters between men and women.
Influence of age
At the start of the study, 35 patients (56%) were younger than 50 years and 28 (44%) between 50 and 75 years of age. As was expected, older patients had a higher BMI, waist circumference, WH ratio, LDL cholesterol, TC, TG, fasting glucose, SBP, and DBP compared with younger patients (data not shown). The individualized rhGH dose used in older patients was significantly lower compared with younger patients (0.4 ± 0.2 mg/day compared with 0.6 ± 0.3 mg/day, P = 0.012). Age was not a significant covariate of the IGF-I response to treatment. The differences in LDL and total cholesterol concentrations after 7 years of rhGH replacement were higher in the older patients compared with the younger patients (1.4 ± 0.9 mmol/l compared with 0.9 ± 1.0 mmol/l for LDL cholesterol, P = 0.020, and 1.3 ± 1.0 mmol/l compared with 0.4 ± 0.9 mmol/l for TC, P = 0.001). The mean change in TG was 0.4 ± 0.9 mmol/l in older patients compared with 0.5 ± 1.5 mmol/l in younger patients (P = 0.006). Younger patients had a larger increase in BMI compared with older patients (2.2 ± 2.7 kg/m2 compared with 0.9 ± 1.7 kg/m2 respectively, P = 0.036). The mean change in DBP was larger in older patients compared with younger patients (6.7 ± 8.0 compared with 1.7 ± 9.2 mmHg, P = 0.033). There were no age differences in the response of HDL cholesterol, glucose, waist circumference, WH ratio, or SBP to 7 years of rhGH replacement.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Short-term effects of rhGH on biochemical cardiovascular risk factors have been reported in many studies, including a recent meta-analysis, restricted to placebo-controlled trials. These studies conclude that rhGH replacement therapy was beneficial for TC and HDL cholesterol levels, but had a negative influence on glucose and insulin concentrations (2). Long-term observational studies are rather scarce. Götherström et al. published their results of rhGH replacement therapy during 5 years in a cohort of 118 patients (3). We identified only three other studies with a follow-up of more than 5 years, comprising 33 patients in total, which described biochemical and anthropometric changes after GH substitution (4, 5, 7).
Fasting glucose increased in our study in accordance with a weighted mean increase of 0.2 mmol/l demonstrated in the meta-analysis of short-term studies (2), and the increase in fasting glucose found in the largest observational study (3). However, during long-term studies in a limited number of patients, only a transient increase in fasting glucose during the first year of the study was observed (7, 8). This discrepancy with the increase in the meta-analysis and the increase in the largest observational study might be explained by the number of patients included. The increase of fasting glucose is probably due to the direct GH-induced insulin resistance (9).
In our study, the decrease in TC and LDL cholesterol levels was manifest during the first 5 years of rhGH replacement and continued even to decrease thereafter. This is consistent with the mean weighted changes during short-term rhGH replacement calculated in the meta-analysis and with the changes found by Göther-ström et al. during 5 years of rhGH replacement (2, 3). In the studies of 7 years or longer, summarized in Table 3
, LDL cholesterol concentrations persistently decreased, but TC decreased in only one study (4). HDL cholesterol levels significantly increased after 5 years of rhGH replacement, mainly due to the increase after 2 years. However, no increase was found in short-term studies included in the meta-analysis, which is consistent with our findings that HDL cholesterol increased mainly after 3 years of rhGH (2). Similar to the present findings, HDL cholesterol levels increased in three out of the five long-term studies summarized in Table 3
(3, 5, 6). TG concentrations remained unchanged in our study, and in all long-term studies, except for a minimal decrease observed by Götherström et al. (3).
The effects on blood pressure were minimal. DBP decreased after 7 years of rhGH replacement, but this effect was abolished when patients on antihypertensive medication were excluded. SBP remained unchanged. In line with these findings, only one other long-term study reported beneficial changes on DBP with SBP remaining unaffected (4).
BMI significantly increased during follow-up, but waist circumference and WH ratio remained unchanged. The increase in BMI in patients receiving rhGH replacement for 7 years is consistent with a previous report in only 12 adults, in which both treated and untreated GHD adults showed an increase in BMI after 7 years (4). It appears that increasing age of GHD adults is associated with an increase in BMI, irrespective of rhGH replacement, like in the normal population (10). However, favorable changes in body composition (increase in fat free mass and decrease in body fat mass) were reported in four out of the five long-term studies (36). Waist circumference, a more sensitive parameter reflecting visceral adipose tissue remained unaffected.
The question to be addressed is whether our observations were affected by the subgroup of patients using lipid-lowering and/or antihypertensive medication. Excluding patients using lipid-lowering drugs did not affect our observations for TC, HDL cholesterol, and TG levels. For LDL cholesterol, the decrease manifested after 5 years, and thereafter. However, as expected, the decrease in TC was significantly greater in patients using lipid-lowering drugs. Conversely, when patients using antihypertensive medication were excluded, the decrease in DBP was no longer significant (P = 0.064). The favorable clinical effects on the lipid profile might be attributed to the patients who were withdrawn from the study. However, such effect was not demonstrable in a detailed subanalysis. Patients became substantially older during this study, which may have negatively affected various studied parameters. On the other hand, IGF-I continued to increase during this study, which might be due to age-related increased responsiveness to GH replacement. It is therefore conceivable that part of the ongoing favorable effects that we describe here are due to the effect of IGF-I.
The consequence of the increase in fasting glucose in terms of cardiovascular morbidity of mortality remains to be determined, but it has been established that there is a graded positive correlation between fasting glucose levels and the subsequent 12-year occurrence of cardiovascular events, even apparent for glucose levels below the diabetic threshold (11, 12).
The clinical relevance of these long-term effects of rhGH on lipids can best be discussed in view of the previously documented beneficial changes of lipid-lowering drugs (especially statins). In our study, TC and LDL cholesterol levels decreased with a mean change of 0.8 (11% decrease) and 1.0 mmol/l (22% decrease) respectively. In patients treated for hypercholesterolemia, cardiovascular mortality risk reduces by 15% for every 10% points of cholesterol lowering by conventional lipid-lowering drugs (13). Whether lowering of TC levels in GHD adults is associated with the same magnitude of reduction in cardiovascular mortality remains to be established. In patients with risk factors for cardiovascular disease, lipid-lowering should be targeted at LDL cholesterol below 2.6 mmol/l, TC below 5.2 mmol/l, and HDL cholesterol above 1.6 mmol/l (14). Since patients with hypopituitarism are at increased risk for cardiovascular mortality (15, 16), we applied these targets to our population on rhGH replacement alone (n = 53). Target goals were reached on rhGH replacement alone in 8 out of 49 patients with elevated LDL cholesterol concentrations for LDL cholesterol, in only 11 out of 44 patients with elevated TC concentrations for TC, and in 17 out of 40 patients with low HDL cholesterol for HDL cholesterol. It should be noted that the recently published clinical practice guideline for evaluation and treatment of adult GHD did not incorporate guidelines for cholesterol or blood pressure (17).
In conclusion, persistent beneficial changes are present even after 7 years of rhGH treatment. However, given the magnitude of these changes on lipid concentrations by rhGH alone and the fact that adults with panhypopituitarism are at high risk of (cardiovascular) mortality, we propose that these patients should be carefully monitored according to a multimodality approach in addition to rhGH replacement.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |