|
|
||||||||
CLINICAL STUDY |
1 Department of Endocrinology, 2 Faculty of Pharmacy, Saint-Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon and 3 Division of Clinical Pathology of the American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
(Correspondence should be addressed to M-H Gannagé-Yared; Division of Endocrinology, Hôtel-Dieu de France Hospital, Adib Ishaac St., Beirut, Lebanon; Email: mhcyared{at}terra.net.lb)
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design and methods: In this cross-sectional study, a total of 153 healthy non-diabetic men aged 50 and above (mean age 59.3±7 years) had a detailed clinical and biological evaluation. Subjects were classified according to the National Cholesterol Education Program criteria of the MetS. Insulin sensitivity was determined by the Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI).
Results: Subjects with the MetS had lower adiponectin and higher leptin levels (P<0.0001 for both variables) compared with individuals without the MetS. Adiponectin was significantly correlated with waist size, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and QUICKI (r=0.33, 0.26, 0.45 and 0.36 respectively, P<0.0001 for all variables). The relation between adiponectin and HDL cholesterol, triglycerides and QUICKI remained significant after adjustment for age and body mass index (BMI). Also, leptin was strongly correlated with waist size and QUICKI (r=0.63 and 0.63 respectively, P<0.001 for both variables). However, its relation to the lipid profile was weak (for cholesterol r=0.16, P<0.05; for triglycerides r=0.17, P<0.05) and disappeared after adjustment for BMI. Adiponectin was positively correlated with sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) (r=0.39, P<0.001) and inversely correlated with free-androgen index (r=0.24, P<0.01), estradiol and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (r=0.165, P<0.05; r=0.21, P<0.01 respectively). This difference remained significant for SHBG after adjustment for age and BMI (r=0.20, P<0.005). Finally, leptin was inversely correlated with total testosterone and SHBG (r=0.44, P<0.001; r=0.30, P<0.001 respectively); the relation with testosterone remained significant after adjustment for BMI. No significant relationship of either adiponectin or leptin with GH or IGF-I values was observed. In a stepwise multiple regression analysis, the independent predictors of adiponectin were HDL cholesterol, QUICKI, age and BMI (P<0.0001, P=0.005, P=0.002 and P=0.047 respectively) while for leptin, it was QUICKI, waist size and testosterone (P<0.0001, P<0.0001 and P= 0.004 respectively). The adjusted R2 values were 0.34 and 0.55.
Conclusion: Our results show that in a healthy elderly male population, both adiponectin and leptin are related to insulin sensitivity, independent of age and BMI. While adiponectin is independently related to triglycerides and HDL cholesterol, the weak relationship of leptin to the lipid profile is completely mediated by BMI. In addition, and more interestingly, both adipocytokines are strongly associated with sex steroids. We speculate that SHBG is regulated by adiponectin and that there is an inhibitory effect of testosterone on the adiponectin gene. Further studies are needed to fully elucidate these relationships.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The relation between sex steroids, growth hormone (GH)/insulin growth factor-I (IGF-I) axis and adipocytokines has recently been the subject of several reports. Adiponectin was found to be lower in men compared with women (1617), despite an inverse relationship between estradiol and adiponectin, indicating that, in addition to estradiol, other gender-dependent factors may be of relevance. However, the relationship between testosterone and adiponectin is subject to controversy. Testosterone has been shown to decrease adiponectin levels in rodents (16). In addition, compared with eugonadal subjects, hypogonadal men have higher adiponectin levels, which are reduced by testosterone replacement therapy (18). In contrast, in a third study, testosterone administration has not been shown to affect adiponectin levels in older men with low testosterone levels (19). On the other hand, in males, negative correlations between testosterone and leptin have been shown (2022). In all these previous studies, the relationship of adiponectin or leptin to sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and free testosterone has not been studied.
The relationship between the GH/IGF-I axis and adipocytokines is also not well established and is subject to controversy. Adiponectin levels have been found to be normal (23, 24) or reduced (25) in active acromegaly despite the insulin-resistance state of the disease. Conversely, in GH-deficient patients, an increase in adiponectin levels after recombinant growth hormone therapy was observed in two studies (26, 27), while a third study did not show this effect (28).
Since the relationship between adipocytokines and both sex steroids and the GH/IGF-I axis has been the subject of few and controversial reports and has never been studied in Middle-Eastern populations, the present study was performed to: i) evaluate, in our male population, the relationship of adiponectin and leptin with the components of the MetS, and ii) to clarify the relationship of both adiponectin and leptin with sex steroids (more particularly, the free-androgen index and SHBG) and the GH/IGF-I.
| Subjects and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One hundred and fifty-three healthy Lebanese volunteers, men aged 50 and above (mean age 59.3±7 years) were recruited to this study, which was approved by the Ethics Committee of our Hospital. After signing a written and informed consent to participate in the study, subjects provided a fasting blood sample and completed a questionnaire about their demographic characteristics, smoking status, sedentarity and present medications. We also measured their weight, height, waist and their systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressures (DBP) after half-an-hour of rest. The body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (in kilograms) over the square of the height (in squared meters). Waist circumference was measured at midway between the lower rib and the iliac crest. Exclusion criteria were diabetes mellitus (defined according to the last American diabetes association classification as a fasting glucose of more than 126 mg/dl (29)), hypogonadism or treatment with testosterone, hypopituitarism, high plasma creatinine levels (defined in our laboratory as a creatinine level higher than 15 mg/l), a serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) level more than two times the upper limit of normal and any treatment with drugs that may affect insulin sensitivity such as corticosteroids and nicotinic acid. Diabetic subjects were excluded, since treatment of the disease with oral agents or insulin may affect adiponectin levels and interfere with the analysis. In addition, diabetes is a condition with lower adiponectin levels. Twenty-two patients on lipid lowering therapy were included in the study. Also, 23 subjects had coronary artery disease (based on a previous coronary angiography) and 43 were hypertensive.
The subjects were classified as metabolic syndrome positive (MetS+) if they met three or more of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria (30); increased waist circumference
102 cm, elevated triglycerides
150 mg/dl, reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol <40 mg/dl, elevated blood pressure
130/85 mmHg or treated hypertension, elevated glucose
100 mg/dl. All the patients on lipid lowering therapy were correctly classified according to the MetS, taking into account, the present and past (before medication) lipid profiles. Sedentarity was assessed according to the following score (score 0 for at least 30 min exercise per week, score 1 for at least 30 min exercise 25 times per week, score 2 for at least 30 min exercise more than 5 times per week).
Methods
Serum glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, creatinine and SGPT were measured using an automate Kodak. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) was calculated according to the Friedewald equation. The following hormone measurements were performed using commercially available RIA kits as follows: leptin (DSL, Webster, TX, USA; sensitivity 0.10 ng/ml, intraassay coefficient of variation 4.9%), adiponectin (LINCO Research, Inc, St Charles MO, USA; sensitivity 1 ng/ml, intraassay coefficient of variation <9.5%), IGF-I (Nichols Diagnostics, San Juan Capistrano, CA, USA; sensitivity 6 ng/ml, intraassay coefficient of variation 4.6%), ultrasensitive estradiol (CIS Bio international, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France; sensitivity 1.36 pg/ml, intraassay coefficient of variation 7.35%). All radioimmunological measurements were performed in duplicate. Insulin, GH, total testosterone, SHBG, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) were performed using commercial chemiluminescent assays (Immulite, DPC, Los Angeles, CA, USA). The respective sensitivities of the assays are 2 mIU/ml, 0.01 ng/ml, 15 ng/dl, 0.2 nmol/l and 2 µg/dl. Also, all the coefficients of variation were below 9%.
Insulin sensitivity was estimated using the Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI) determined according to the equation QUICKI=1/(log insulin (mlU/ml)+ log glucose (mg/dl)) (31). Low QUICKI indicates low insulin sensitivity, while high QUICKI indicates high insulin sensitivity. The free-androgen index was calculated as total testosterone (converted to nmol/l)/SHBG (in nmol/l)x10.
Statistical analysis
SPSS version 13 was used to perform the statistical analysis. Differences in baseline clinical and biological characteristics between men with and without the MetS were tested for statistical significance with the Students t-test and were indicated by the
2-test. The Pearson coefficient was used for linear correlations between variables. Finally, and because variables are interrelated, a stepwise regression analysis was performed to find the most important explanatory variables for adiponectin and leptin. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analysis.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
In MetS+ subjects, BMI, waist size, SBP and DBP values and the number of treated subjects for dyslipidemia (P<0.0001, P<0.0001, P=0.004, P=0.009, P=0.03 respectively) were significantly higher compared with metabolic syndrome negative (MetS) individuals. Also, in the MetS+ group, QUICKI, HDL cholesterol, adiponectin and GH were significantly lower (P<0.0001, P<0.0001, P<0.0001 and P=0.005 respectively), while triglycerides, leptin and SGPT were significantly higher (P<0.0001, P<0.0001, P=0.002 respectively) compared with the MetS group. Finally, testosterone and SHBG were statistically lower in MetS+ subjects (P=0.006 and P=0.004 respectively).
Baseline correlations between adipocytokines and markers of the metabolic syndrome
Adiponectin and leptin were inversely correlated (r=0.23, P<0.01). While adiponectin was positively correlated with age (r=0.36, P<0.001) (Fig. 1A
) and inversely correlated with BMI (r=0.36, P<0.001), leptin was only positively correlated with BMI (r=0.55, P<0.001), with no statistically significant correlation with age. That is why the correlations of adiponectin with all the variables were adjusted for age and BMI, while the correlations of leptin were adjusted only for BMI (Tables 2
and 3
).
|
|
|
|
The QUICKI was correlated with total testosterone and SHBG (r=0.35 and 0.33 respectively, P<0.001) with no significant correlation with the free-androgen index. This relationship remained significant after adjustment for BMI (r=0.215 and 0.213 respectively; P<0.01). On the other hand, adiponectin was weakly correlated with total testosterone (r=0.16, P<0.05), and strongly correlated with SHBG (r=0.39, P<0.001) explaining its inverse and statistically significant relationship with the free-androgen index (r=0.24, P<0.01) (Fig. 1C
). Because, in our population, SHBG was associated with waist size and BMI (r=0.25, P<0.01, and r=0.32, P<0.001 respectively), the relationship between SHBG and adiponectin was analyzed after adjustment for both waist and BMI. Adiponectin is still positively correlated with SHBG after adjustment for both variables (r=0.33 and 0.31, P<0.001) suggesting that the association between adiponectin and SHBG is independent of obesity. Also, adiponectin was inversely correlated with estradiol and DHEAS (r=0.165, P<0.05; r=0.21, P<0.01 respectively). However, after adjustment for age and BMI, all the correlations of adiponectin with sex steroids disappeared (testosterone, free-androgen index, DHEAS and estradiol) except the relationship with SHBG (r=0.20, P<0.005) (Table 3
). Finally, leptin was strongly inversely correlated with total testosterone and SHBG (r= 0.44, P<0.001, r=0.30, P<0.001 respectively) (Fig. 2B
). The relation of leptin with testosterone remained significant even after adjustment for BMI showing an independent relationship of leptin to testosterone (Table 2
; Table 3
).
Baseline correlations between QUICKI, adipocytokines and the GH/IGF-I axis
No significant relationship of either adiponectin or leptin with GH or IGF-I values was observed. QUICKI was weakly correlated with GH levels (r=0.16, P=0.05) with no significant correlation with IGF-I
Stepwise regression analysis
A stepwise multiple regression analysis was used to look at the independent variables that may affect adiponectin and leptin. The variables entered in the model are the following: age, BMI, waist size, SBP, DBP, cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, DHEAS, free-androgen index, testosterone, estradiol, GH, IGF-I, smoking status, sedentarity score and lipid lowering treatment. Leptin was also included in the regression when adiponectin was the dependent variable and vice versa. For adiponectin, HDL cholesterol, QUICKI, age and BMI (P<0.0001, P=0.005, P=0.002 and P=0.047 respectively) were the most important predictors; while for leptin, it was the QUICKI, waist and testosterone (P<0.0001, P<0.0001 and P=0.004 respectively). The adjusted R2 for the adiponectin and the leptin models were respectively 0.34 and 0.55 (Table 4
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We also found that the relationship of leptin with BMI and with the QUICKI is stronger than the relationship of adiponectin, but its relationship with the lipid parameters is weaker. After adjustment for BMI, the relationship of leptin with lipid parameters disappeared but remained strongly significant for the QUICKI. Similar to our results, the correlation between leptin and lipid parameters in the Baratta study (32) was entirely mediated by BMI. On the other hand, the strong relationship which we and others (22) found between insulin sensitivity and leptin, independent of BMI, could explain the fact that leptin is an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease as was shown in the WOSCOPS study (15). For this reason, it was proposed (22) that relative (BMI-corrected) hyperleptinemia may be a new component of the MetS and one can speculate that subjects with relative hyperleptinemia develop their MetS at an earlier stage. Surprisingly, the results of the Baratta study (32) differed from our results and the correlation between leptin and insulin sensitivity was found, in that study, to be mediated entirely by BMI. This difference from our results could be explained by gender or other unknown differences related to their population characteristics; in the Baratta study, the major part of the population was females. Further studies are needed to define the factors that may influence the relationship of leptin with insulin resistance.
We also looked at the relationship of both QUICKI and adipocytokines with sex steroids. We found that the QUICKI was correlated with total testosterone and SHBG but not with the free-androgen index; this relation was independent of BMI. Previous studies on the relationship between androgens and insulin sensitivity gave conflicting results depending on whether total or free testosterone was measured. One explanation for this discrepancy is that SHBG is mediating the link between testosterone and insulin sensitivity. In fact, insulin exerts an inhibitory effect on the SHBG production by the liver (37). An alternative explanation is that the assays used to measure free testosterone have methodological limitations. Low endogenous testosterone levels in healthy men are positively associated with higher cardiovascular risk profile (BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, lipid profile (38), insulin resistance (3942)) and with an increased risk of future development of diabetes (43). This relationship was found to be independent of age, obesity, and body fat distribution (44, 45). In contrast, data on the relationship between free testosterone levels and insulin sensitivity are conflicting, with two studies showing no correlation (46, 47), whereas a third study demonstrates a weak positive relationship (40). In addition, and most likely as a result of reducing body fat, testosterone therapy has been shown to reduce LDL (48) and to improve insulin sensitivity (49). Thus, the relationship we found between QUICKI and total testosterone is in line with the previous literature. Also, the absence of correlation that we found between the free-androgen index and QUICKI confirms the results of the two previous studies mentioned above (46, 47). Finally, we found lower testosterone and SHBG levels in subjects with the MetS compared with subjects without the MetS. This finding was also recently described in middle-aged men in whom testosterone and SHBG predicts the MetS and diabetes (43). We also looked at the relationship of both leptin and adiponectin with sex steroids. We found that leptin was strongly inversely correlated with testosterone and SHBG, but not with the free-androgen index. After adjustment for BMI, the relationship of leptin with testosterone is maintained, despite its disappearance with SHBG. Also, in our results, testosterone was found to be a strong predictor of leptin in the stepwise regression analysis reinforcing the independent important inverse relationship between leptin and testosterone. The relationship between leptin and testosterone in the elderly population has not been extensively studied. An inverse relation between both variables has previously been reported in cross-sectional studies (2022). In addition, testosterone therapy reduces serum leptin concentrations in subjects with low testosterone levels (50). The explanation for that relationship is the presence of functional leptin receptors in reproductive tissues. Even if the exact role of leptin is not fully understood, it is involved in normal sexual maturation and reproduction (51). More interesting was the relationship between adiponectin and sex steroids. Adiponectin was found to be correlated with both total testosterone and SHBG, with a much stronger relationship with SHBG, the result being a statistically inverse correlation with the free-androgen index. The strong relationship of adiponectin to SHBG was persistent after adjustment for age, waist or BMI suggesting that there is a direct link between SHBG and adiponectin, independent of obesity. Our report is the first to show this strong relationship in a male population. In another recent report, in women with polycystic ovary disease, adiponectin concentrations correlated positively with serum SHBG and testosterone (52). Adiponectin may directly stimulate SHBG secretion by the liver, the opposite of the inhibitory effect of insulin on SHBG (37). On the other hand, previous studies have shown that adiponectin is higher in hypogonadal men compared with eugonadal men (18) and has been reduced (18, 53) or not (19) by testosterone therapy in men with low testosterone. The inverse relationship we found between adiponectin and both the free-androgen index and DHEAS is in line with the above findings. Those results suggest that, in male hypogonadism, the insulin resistant state is not mediated by low adiponectin levels. We speculate that, besides the direct effect of adiponectin on SHBG, there is a strong inhibitory effect of androgens (free testosterone and DHEAS) on adiponectin levels. We think that there is a need to look at the genetic regulation of the adiponectin gene by androgens. We also found an inverse relationship between adiponectin and estradiol. This relationship disappears after adjustment for both age and BMI. The relationship of adiponectin to estradiol is controversial; adiponectin has been proven to be gender dependent, with higher levels in women than in men (16, 17). While some authors found no effect of estrogens on adiponectin (16), Gavrila et al. (54) have recently found a negative relationship between both variables in women.
Finally, we did not find in our population any relationship between either adiponectin or leptin and GH or IGF-I levels. The relationship between insulin sensitivity and the GH/IGF-I axis is still controversial. The increased cardiovascular mortality associated with hypopituitarism (55) was partly attributed to untreated GH deficiency mainly because of the adverse serum lipid patterns. However, in GH-deficient subjects, GH treatment results in improved (56) or worsening (57) insulin sensitivity depending on the GH doses, with a worsening at higher doses. Even in healthy adults, the metabolic effects of GH are dose- and gender-dependent, with the standard adult GH deficiency replacement dose inducing insulin resistance, whereas lower doses improved insulin sensitivity, especially in males (58). Compared with subjects without the MetS, we found that those with MetS had lower baseline GH but no differences in IGF-I levels. Even if this finding was not described in the MetS, it has previously been described in obesity, where basal and total 24-h GH levels are decreased (59). A defect in the hypothalamicpituitary axis or an increase in the somatostatin inhibitory action might be contributing factors for this finding (59). Studies looking at the effect of GH therapy on adipocytokines are also conflicting. Although GH-deficient subjects displayed several metabolic abnormalities associated with low adiponectin (such as high BMI, visceral adiposity), adiponectin was not found to be lower in GH-deficient subjects compared with controls (27). However, the long-term treatment by recombinant human growth hormone induced a slight statistically significant increment in adiponectin (27). This slight increase was also observed in another study only in women (26), while a third study did not show any effect (28). Finally, the interaction between serum leptin and the IGF-I system was also recently studied both in men and women. There was a significant correlation between leptin and free IGF-I but not with total IGF-I in men (60). This difference from our results could be explained by the fact that, in our study, the total, but not the free IGF-I was measured. Also, the absence of a relationship between adipocytokines and GH/IGF-I that we found may be related to the normal IGF-I axis in our study population; thus small modifications of adiponectin and leptin may not be detected.
In conclusion, the new relationships we described between adiponectin and androgens are of great interest. We speculate that adiponectin directly stimulates SHBG secretion by the liver. Also, the direct inverse relationship we found between the free-androgen index and adiponectin suggests that testosterone downregulates the expression of the adiponectin gene. In addition, the strong relationship we found between leptin and QUICKI, independent of BMI, reinforces the need to define the factors (gender, ethnic or others) that may influence the relationship of leptin with insulin resistance. Further studies are needed to fully elucidate the above findings.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S A Paul Chubb, Z. Hyde, O. P Almeida, L. Flicker, P. E Norman, K. Jamrozik, G. J Hankey, and B. B Yeap Lower sex hormone-binding globulin is more strongly associated with metabolic syndrome than lower total testosterone in older men: the Health in Men Study Eur. J. Endocrinol., June 1, 2008; 158(6): 785 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |