Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/EJE-09-0542
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 161, Issue 6, 895-902
Copyright © 2009 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
EJE-09-0542v1
161/6/895    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nygaard, B.
Right arrow Articles by Faber, J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nygaard, B.
Right arrow Articles by Faber, J.

CLINICAL STUDY

Effect of combination therapy with thyroxine (T4) and 3,5,3'-triiodothyronine versus T4 monotherapy in patients with hypothyroidism, a double-blind, randomised cross-over study

Birte Nygaard, Ebbe Winther Jensen, Jan Kvetny1, Anne Jarløv2 and Jens Faber

Department of Endocrinology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark1 Department of Endocrinology, Esbjerg Hospital, Esbjerg, Denmark2 Department of Endocrinology, Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark

(Correspondence should be addressed to B Nygaard; Email: binyg{at}heh.regionh.dk)

Background: Treatment of hypothyroidism with 3,5,3'-triiodothyronine (T3) is controversial. A recent meta-analysis concludes that no evidence is present in favour of using T3. However, the analysis included a mixture of different patient groups and dose-regimens.

Objective: To compare the effect of combination therapy with thyroxine (T4) and T3 versus T4 monotherapy in patients with hypothyroidism on stable T4 substitution.

Study design: Double-blind, randomised cross-over. Fifty micrograms of the usual T4 dose was replaced with either 20 µg T3 or 50 µg T4 for 12 weeks, followed by cross-over for another 12 weeks. The T4 dose was regulated if needed, intending unaltered serum TSH levels.

Evaluation: Tests for quality of life (QOL) and depression (SF-36, Beck Depression Inventory, and SCL-90-R) at baseline and after both treatment periods.

Inclusion criteria: Serum TSH between 0.1 and 5.0 mU/l on unaltered T4 substitution for 6 months.

Results: A total of 59 patients (55 women); median age 46 years. When comparing scores of QOL and depression on T4 monotherapy versus T4/T3 combination therapy, significant differences were seen in 7 out of 11 scores, indicating a positive effect related to the combination therapy. Forty-nine percent preferred the combination and 15% monotherapy (P=0.002). Serum TSH remained unaltered between the groups as intended.

Conclusion: In a study design, where morning TSH levels were unaltered between groups combination therapy, (treated with T3 20 µg once daily) was superior to monotherapy by evaluating several QOL, depression and anxiety rating scales as well as patients own preference.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 European Society of Endocrinology.