Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/EJE-09-0339
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 161, Issue 4, 567-573
Copyright © 2009 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
EJE-09-0339v1
161/4/567    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kiewiet, R. M
Right arrow Articles by van der Lely, A. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kiewiet, R. M
Right arrow Articles by van der Lely, A. J.

CLINICAL STUDY

Effects of acute administration of acylated and unacylated ghrelin on glucose and insulin concentrations in morbidly obese subjects without overt diabetes

Rosalie M Kiewiet, Maarten O van Aken, Kim van der Weerd, Piet Uitterlinden, Axel P N Themmen, Leo J Hofland, Yolanda B de Rijke, Patric J D Delhanty, Ezio Ghigo1, Thierry Abribat2 and Aart Jan van der Lely

Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands1 Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Turin, Molinette Hospital, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy2 Alize Pharma SAS, 15, chemin du Saquin, 69130 ECULLY, France

(Correspondence should be addressed to R M Kiewiet; Email: r.kiewiet{at}erasmusmc.nl)

Objective: To investigate the effects of unacylated ghrelin (UAG) and co-administration of acylated ghrelin (AG) and UAG in morbid obesity, a condition characterized by insulin resistance and low GH levels.

Design and method: Eight morbidly obese non-diabetic subjects were treated with either UAG 200 µg, UAG 100 µg in combination with AG 100 µg (Comb) or placebo in three episodes of 4 consecutive days in a double-blind randomized crossover design. Study medication was administered as daily single i.v. bolus injections at 0900 h after an overnight fast. At 1000 h, a standardized meal was served. Glucose, insulin, GH, free fatty acids (FFA) and ghrelin were measured up to 4 h after administration.

Results: Insulin concentrations significantly decreased after acute administration of Comb only, reaching a minimum at 20 min: 58.2±3.9% of baseline versus 88.7±7.2 and 92.7±2.6% after administration of placebo and UAG respectively (P<0.01). After 1 h, insulin concentration had returned to baseline. Glucose concentrations did not change after Comb. However, UAG administration alone did not change glucose, insulin, FFA or GH levels.

Conclusion: Co-administration of AG and UAG as a single i.v. bolus injection causes a significant decrease in insulin concentration in non-diabetic subjects suffering from morbid obesity. Since glucose concentration did not change in the first hour after Comb administration, our data suggest a strong improvement in insulin sensitivity. These findings warrant studies in which UAG with or without AG is administered for a longer period of time. Administration of a single bolus injection of UAG did not influence glucose and insulin metabolism.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
C.-Y. Chen, A. Asakawa, M. Fujimiya, S.-D. Lee, and A. Inui
Ghrelin Gene Products and the Regulation of Food Intake and Gut Motility
Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2009; 61(4): 430 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 European Society of Endocrinology.