Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/EJE-09-0270
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 161, Issue 2, 293-300
Copyright © 2009 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Table 1
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
EJE-09-0270v1
161/2/293    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Veldhuis, J. D
Right arrow Articles by Bowers, C. Y
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Veldhuis, J. D
Right arrow Articles by Bowers, C. Y

CLINICAL STUDY

Preservation of GHRH and GH-releasing peptide-2 efficacy in young men with experimentally induced hypogonadism

Johannes D Veldhuis, Daniel M Keenan1, Joy N Bailey, John M Miles and Cyril Y Bowers2

Endocrine Research Unit, Mayo School of Graduate Medical Education, Clinical Translational Science Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA1 Department of Statistics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904, USA2 Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, USA

(Correspondence should be addressed to J D Veldhuis; Email: veldhuis.johannes{at}mayo.edu)

Background: Somatostatin (SS), GHRH, GH-releasing peptide (GHRP), and the sex-steroid milieu regulate GH secretion.

Objective: To test whether GHRH and GHRP remain effective secretagogs in the face of short-term hypogonadism.

Design: Prospective, randomized double-blind.

Methods: Healthy young men (n=24) received a GnRH agonist twice 3 weeks apart followed by placebo (n=13, Pl) or testosterone (n=11, testosterone) addback. Subjects were then given consecutive i.v. infusions of L-arginine (to restrain SS outflow) and a maximally effective dose of GHRH or GHRP-2 (to test corresponding secretagog pathways).

Results: GH secretion stimulated by L-arginine/GHRH and by L-arginine/GHRP-2 was unaffected by combined testosterone/estradiol (E2) depletion. The low testosterone/E2 milieu decreased basal (nonpulsatile) GH secretion (P=0.038), without altering fasting pulsatile GH secretion or IGF1 or IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-3 concentrations. IGFBP-1 (P<0.0001) and abdominal visceral fat (AVF, P=0.017) correlated negatively with fasting basal GH secretion. By contrast, IGF1 (P=0.0012) and IGFBP-3 (P=0.015) correlated positively with fasting pulsatile GH secretion. AVF (P=0.0024) was a negative determinant, and IGF1 a positive determinant (P=0.018), of GHRH-driven GH pulses. Responses to GHRP-2 were unrelated to any of these factors.

Conclusion: L-arginine/GHRP-2 appears to be an especially robust stimulus of GH secretion, since efficacy is unmodified by profound short-term hypogonadism, a range of AVF estimates, and a spectrum of IGF1, IGFBP-1, and IGFBP-3 concentrations. Whether robustness also applies to chronic hypogonadism is not known.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 European Society of Endocrinology.