Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/EJE-08-0867
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 160, Issue 4, 689-694
Copyright © 2009 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
EJE-08-0867v1
160/4/689    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christopoulos, C
Right arrow Articles by Economopoulos, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christopoulos, C
Right arrow Articles by Economopoulos, P

CLINICAL STUDY

The syndrome of gastric carcinoid and hyperparathyroidism: a family study and literature review

C Christopoulos1,2, V Balatsos1,3, E Rotas1,2, I Karoumpalis1,3, D Papavasileiou1,2, G Kontogeorgos1,4, S Dupasquier5, A Calender5, N Skandalis1,3 and P Economopoulos1

1 , The Greek MEN-1 Study Group2 First Department of Internal Medicine, ‘A. Fleming’ General Hospital, Vas. Alexandrou 7, Kifissia, Athens 14561, Greece, Departments of3 , Gastroenterology4 Pathology, ‘G. Gennimatas’ General Hospital, Athens 11527, Greece5 Department of Genetics and Cancer, University of Lyon, 69437 Lyon Cedex 03, France

(Correspondence should be addressed to C Christopoulos; Email: cgchrist{at}otenet.gr)

Objective: To present evidence supporting the hypothesis that the coexistence of gastric carcinoids (GCs) and hyperparathyroidism may represent a distinct clinical entity, not related to multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1).

Methods: We studied a cohort of five young siblings (age range 26–42 years), one of whom had been found to have GC and hyperparathyroidism. All siblings underwent serial gastroscopies for the assessment of gastric neuroendocrine cell proliferations over a mean follow-up period of 31.2 months. Imaging, biochemical and hormonal as well as molecular genetic investigations were performed in the direction of MEN1 syndrome. The literature was searched for cases with coexistence of GCs and hyperparathyroidism not associated with MEN1.

Results: Four of the siblings, all male, were found to have GCs in a background of Helicobacter pylori-associated chronic atrophic gastritis and pernicious anaemia, with no serological evidence of gastric autoimmunity. In two of them, asymptomatic hyperparathyroidism was also present. Screening for MEN1 gene mutations or large deletions was negative, and hormone and imaging investigations did not support a diagnosis of familial MEN1 syndrome. A literature search revealed sporadic reports of cases with GC and hyperparathyroidism not attributable to MEN1.

Conclusions: The association of GCs and hyperparathyroidism appears to constitute a distinct syndrome that can be encountered in genetically predisposed individuals, and should not be regarded as ‘atypical’ or ‘incomplete’ expression of MEN1. Its prevalence and aetiology should be the subject of future studies. Screening for hyperparathyroidism seems to be justified in patients with GC of any type.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 European Society of Endocrinology.