HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: EJE-08-0292v1 160/2/275    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Meyer, S.-K. Articles by Weber, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Meyer, S.-K. Articles by Weber, T.

Clinical impact of two different intraoperative parathyroid hormone assays in primary and renal hyperparathyroidism

¹ Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany² Department of Internal Medicine I and Clinical Chemistry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany³ Endokrinologische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Heidelberg, Germany⁴ Salem Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany

(Correspondence should be addressed to T Weber who is now at Department of Surgery I, University Hospital, Steinhoevelstrasse 9, 89075 Ulm, Germany; Email: theresia.weber{at}uniklinik-ulm.de)

Background: Intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) monitoring predicts successful surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT). In renal HPT, intraoperative PTH assays can define whether parathyroid resection is adequate.

Methods: Intraoperative PTH was measured with two different immunometric assays (Immulite Turbo DPC and ADVIA Centaur assay) in 91 patients undergoing parathyroidectomy for primary (n=57) and renal (n=34) hyperparathyroidism. PTH was monitored preoperatively, 10, 20, and 30 min after parathyroidectomy and 24 h postoperatively.

Results: Ten minutes after parathyroidectomy, intraoperative PTH dropped into the normal range (<7.6 pmol/l) in 84% of patients with pHPT and tertiary HPT as measured with the ADVIA Centaur assay (PTH-A), compared with 100% of the samples measured with the Immulite Turbo DPC assay (PTH-I; P=0.0082). Twenty minutes after parathyroidectomy for secondary HPT, intraoperative PTH decreased to the normal range in 100% measured with PTH-I compared with 50% measured with PTH-A (P=0.009). Then, 24 h postoperatively, PTH-I and PTH-A levels were within the normal range in all of the successfully treated patients. Both assays correctly identified six patients with persistent disease and another patient with a double adenoma in pHPT.

Conclusions: In patients undergoing parathyroidectomy for primary or renal HPT, PTH levels decreasing to the normal range indicated successful surgery in all of the patients as measured with the PTH-I assay. Comparing the two assays, PTH-I was able to quantify the intraoperative PTH decay more quickly than PTH-A.