Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/EJE-08-0496
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 159, Issue 6, 705-712
Copyright © 2008 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
EJE-08-0496v1
159/6/705    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van der Klaauw, A. A
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, A. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van der Klaauw, A. A
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, A. M

CLINICAL STUDY

Cardiac manifestations of GH deficiency after treatment for acromegaly: a comparison to patients with biochemical remission and controls

Agatha A van der Klaauw1, Jeroen J Bax2, Gabe B Bleeker2, Eduard R Holman2, V Delgado2, Johannes W A Smit1, Johannes A Romijn1 and Alberto M Pereira1

Departments of1 Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, C4-R2 Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands

(Correspondence should be addressed to A A van der Klaauw; Email: a.a.van_der_klaauw{at}lumc.nl)

Objective: Both GH excess and GH deficiency (GHD) lead to specific cardiac pathology. The aim of this study was to evaluate cardiac morphology and function in patients with GHD after treatment for acromegaly.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Patients and methods: Cardiac parameters were studied by conventional two-dimensional echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in 53 patients with acromegaly (16 patients with GHD, 20 patients with biochemical remission, and 17 patients with active disease). Patients with GHD were also compared with age- and gender-matched controls.

Results: Left ventricular (LV) dimensions, wall thickness, and mass did not differ between the three groups, or between the patients with GHD and healthy controls. Systolic function, assessed by LV ejection fraction, tended to be lower in patients with GHD compared with patients with biochemical remission (65.9±7.3% vs 72.4±8.5%, P=0.070), but was higher when compared with active acromegaly (58.8±9.3%, P=0.047). No differences were found with healthy controls. Diastolic function, measured with early diastolic velocity (E'), was lower in patients with GHD when compared with both patients with biochemical remission (6.0±2.1 cm/s vs 8.3±1.5 cm/s, P=0.005) and healthy controls (8.1±1.9 cm/s, P=0.006).

Conclusion: GHD after acromegaly results in a specific decrease in diastolic function compared with patients with biochemical remission of acromegaly and healthy controls. In addition, systolic function tends to be decreased in patients with GHD compared with patients with biochemical remission, but was higher than that in patients with active acromegaly.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 European Society of Endocrinology.