Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/EJE-08-0334
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 159, Issue 6, 685-691
Copyright © 2008 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
EJE-08-0334v1
159/6/685    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bo, S.
Right arrow Articles by Pagano, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bo, S.
Right arrow Articles by Pagano, G.

CLINICAL STUDY

Diet or exercise: what is more effective in preventing or reducing metabolic alterations?

Simona Bo, Giovannino Ciccone1, Sabrina Guidi, Roberto Gambino, Marilena Durazzo, Luigi Gentile2, Maurizio Cassader, Paolo Cavallo-Perin and Gianfranco Pagano

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126 Turin, Italy1 Unit of Epidemiology, S. Giovanni Battista Hospital, Turin, Italy2 Diabetic Clinic, Hospital of Asti, Asti, Italy

(Correspondence should be addressed to S Bo; Email: sbo{at}molinette.piemonte.it)

Objective/design: The influence of diet and exercise on metabolic syndrome is controversial since fit individuals might also eat healthier foods. We evaluated the association of diet/exercise variation with reductions in metabolic variables and C-reactive protein (CRP) values in the experimental and control arms of a 1-year randomized lifestyle intervention trial performed in patients with multiple metabolic abnormalities.

Methods: A prospective study of 169 cases and 166 controls after a lifestyle intervention was performed.

Results: In the intervention group, 15/169 (8.9%), 63/169 (37.3%), and 70/169 (41.4%) reached only dietary, only exercise, and dietary/exercise targets respectively. Reductions in weight, body mass index (BMI), and waist were significant only in patients who increased exercise. Most controls did not reach any target (131/166, 78.9%), while only few patients reached only dietary (13/166, 7.8%), only exercise (5/166, 3.0%), and dietary/exercise targets (17/166, 10.2%). Weight, BMI, and waist reduction was more pronounced in those reaching the exercise target. In the whole cohort, increased exercise was inversely associated with weight, BMI, waist, and CRP, increased saturated fat was directly associated with weight, BMI, waist, and diastolic pressure variations, while increased fiber intake was inversely associated with glucose values in a multiple regression model. After adjusting for waist changes, the associations between exercise and CRP (ß=–0.023; 95% CI –0.028 –0.017; P<0.001) and the associations between fiber and glucose (ß=–0.022; –0.031 –0.013; P<0.001) remained significant.

Conclusions: Independent of weight reduction, exercise level and fiber intake are inversely associated with CRP and fasting glucose values respectively. Change in lifestyle may lower inflammation and prevent metabolic deterioration.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 European Society of Endocrinology.