Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/EJE-08-0339
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 159, Issue 6, 675-684
Copyright © 2008 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sneve, M
Right arrow Articles by Jorde, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sneve, M
Right arrow Articles by Jorde, R

CLINICAL STUDY

Supplementation with cholecalciferol does not result in weight reduction in overweight and obese subjects

M Sneve1, Y Figenschau2,3 and R Jorde1,4

Departments of1 , Internal Medicine2 Medical Biochemistry, University Hospital of North Norway, 9038 Tromsø, Norway3 , Institute of Medical Biology4 Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway

(Correspondence should be addressed to M Sneve who is now at Medical Department B, University Hospital of North Norway, PO Box 101, 9038 Tromsø, Norway; Email: monica.sneve{at}unn.no)

Objective: Investigate whether cholecalciferol supplementation leads to weight loss in overweight and obese adults.

Design: Randomized double blind clinical trial with 20 000 IU cholecalciferol twice a week, or 20 000 IU once a week plus placebo, or placebo twice a week, for 12 months. All subjects were given 500 mg calcium supplementation.

Methods: Four hundred and forty five healthy, overweight, and obese men and women (age 21–70 years, body mass index (BMI) 28.0–47.0 kg/m2). Body weight, fatness, and fat distribution parameters were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and anthropometry, blood samples and 24-h urinary samples were collected.

Results: At baseline, there were no significant differences between the groups, but there was a significant inverse relation between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels and BMI, and a significant positive association between calorie intake and BMI. Three hundred and thirty four subjects completed the study. During the study, there was no significant change in weight, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) or percentage body fat in any of the groups, nor between them. Parathyroid hormone decreased and 25(OH)D increased significantly in both groups receiving cholecalciferol, and serum levels of 25(OH)D stabilized after 3 months. Serum calcium was unchanged in all groups. Urinary calcium excretion increased in all groups, but there was no significant difference between the groups. Weekly dosage of 20 000–40 000 IU cholecalciferol for 12 months was associated with a low risk of adverse effects, at least in overweight and obese adults living at latitude 70° N.

Conclusion: Significant weight reduction in overweight and obese subjects is unlikely to occur with cholecalciferol supplementation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 European Society of Endocrinology.