Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/EJE-08-0414
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 159, Issue 5, 547-554
Copyright © 2008 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
EJE-08-0414v1
159/5/547    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Veldhuis, J. D
Right arrow Articles by Keenan, D. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Veldhuis, J. D
Right arrow Articles by Keenan, D. M

CLINICAL STUDY

Secretagogues govern GH secretory-burst waveform and mass in healthy eugonadal and short-term hypogonadal men

Johannes D Veldhuis and Daniel M Keenan1

Endocrine Research Unit, Clinical Translational Research Unit, Mayo Medical and Graduate Schools, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA1 Department of Statistics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904, USA

(Correspondence should be addressed to J D Veldhuis; Email: veldhuis.johannes{at}mayo.edu)

Background: GH pulses are putatively initiated by hypothalamic GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), amplified by GH-releasing peptide (GHRP), and inhibited by somatostatin (SS).

Objective: To ascertain how secretagogues control the waveform (time evolution of release rates) as well as the mass of secretory bursts.

Design: We quantified the shape of GH secretory bursts evoked by continuous combined i.v. infusion of maximally effective doses of GHRH and GHRP-2, and by bolus injection of each peptide after delivering L-arginine to restrain hypothalamic SS release in 12 healthy young men.

Methods: A mathematically verified and experimentally validated variable-waveform deconvolution model was applied to intensively sampled GH time series.

Results: The secretory-burst mode (time from burst onset to maximal secretion) was 19±0.69 min during saline infusion, and fell to a) 10.4±3.0 min during constant dual stimulation with GHRH/GHRP-2 (P<0.01), b) 14.6±1.8 min after L-arginine/GHRH (P<0.025), and c) 15.0±1.0 min after L-arginine/GHRH (P<0.01). Secretagogues augmented the mass of GH secreted in pulses by 44-, 42-, and 16-fold respectively, over saline (2.2±0.81 µg/l per h; P<0.001 for each). Pulse number and variability were unaffected. Applying the same methodology to ten other young men with acute leuprolide-induced hypogonadism yielded comparable waveform and mass estimates.

Conclusion: The present analyses in men demonstrate that peptidyl secretagogues modulate not only the magnitude but also the time course of the GH-release process in vivo independently of the short-term sex-steroid milieu.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 European Society of Endocrinology.