Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/EJE-07-0876
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 159, Issue 2, 171-178
Copyright © 2008 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
EJE-07-0876v1
159/2/171    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cailleux-Bounacer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, J. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cailleux-Bounacer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, J. M.

CLINICAL STUDIES

Evaluation of endocrine testing of Leydig cell function using extractive and recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin and different doses of recombinant human LH in normal men

Anne Cailleux-Bounacer, Yves Reznik2, Bruno Cauliez1, Jean François Menard, Céline Duparc and Jean Marc Kuhn

Department of Endocrinology and INSERM CIC 204, Rouen University Hospital, 76000 Rouen, France1 Department of Hormonal Biochemistry, 76000 Rouen, France2 Department of Endocrinology, Caen University Hospital, 14000 Caen, France

(Correspondence should be addressed to J M Kuhn who is now at Department of Endocrinology, Hôpital de Bois Guillaume, 147 Avenue du Maréchal Juin, 76230 Bois Guillaume, France; Email: jean-marc.kuhn{at}chu-rouen.fr)

Background: The functional testing of endocrine testis uses extractive human chorionic gonadotropin (ehCG). Recombinant human hCG (rhCG), avoiding any contamination, should replace ehCG. Moreover, a functional evaluation with recombinant human LH (rhLH) would be closer to physiology than a pharmacological testing with hCG.

Methods: The study was conducted in normal men. We first evaluated the dose–effect of ehCG on plasma testosterone and estradiol levels, before and after injection of either hCG or vehicle. Secondly, the responses to the optimal dose of ehCG were compared with those of rhCG. Thirdly, we investigated the dose–effect of rhLH, on steroid hormone secretion. LH, testosterone, and estradiol plasma levels were measured after the injection of either rhLH or placebo.

Results: ehCG induced dose-dependent increases in plasma estradiol and testosterone levels. They respectively peaked at 24 and 72 h after the injection. The most potent dose of ehCG (5000 IU) induced results similar to those observed with 250 µg (6500 IU) rhCG. By comparison with placebo, rhLH induced a significant and dose-dependent increase in plasma testosterone levels 4 h after the injection. Peak response of testosterone to rhLH and rhCG was significantly correlated. rhLH did not induce significant change in plasma estradiol level.

Conclusions: In normal men, a single i.v. injection of 150 IU rhLH induces a 25% rise in plasma testosterone levels by comparison with placebo. At the moment, the dynamic evaluation using hCG remains the gold standard test to explore the Leydig cell function. The use of 250 µg rhCG avoiding any contamination should be recommended.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 European Society of Endocrinology.