|
|
||||||||
CLINICAL STUDIES |
1 Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Divisione Malattie Metaboliche 3 and 2 Laboratorio Sperimentale di Ricerche Auxo-Endocrinologiche, 28921 Verbania, Italy3 Laboratory INSERM U887 Motricity-Plasticity, Faculty of Sports Sciences, University of Burgundy, 21078 Dijon, France4 Institute of Bioimaging and Molecular Physiology, CNR, 20090 Milan, Italy and 5 Neuromuscular Research Laboratory, Schulthess Clinic, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland
(Correspondence should be addressed to A Sartorio who is now at Laboratorio Sperimentale di Ricerche Auxo-Endocrinologiche, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Via Ariosto 13, 20145 Milan, Italy; Email: sartorio{at}auxologico.it)
Background: It is well established that repeated GHRH administration or repeated voluntary exercise bouts are associated with a complete blunting of GH responsiveness when the administration of the second stimulus follows the first one after a 2-h interval.
Aim: To evaluate GH responses to neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in healthy adults.
Methods: Six volunteers (mean age±S.D. 31.7±5.5 years) were studied before and after two consecutive bouts of NMES exercise (a series of 20 contractions at the maximum of individual tolerance, frequency: 75 Hz, pulse duration: 400 µs, on–off ratio: 6.25–20 s) administered at a 2-h interval.
Results: Baseline GH levels (mean: 0.3±0.2 ng/ml) significantly increased after the first NMES (peak: 4.2±3.7 ng/ml), with a complete normalization after 120 min (0.3±0.3 ng/ml). The administration of the second bout of NMES of comparable characteristics also resulted in a significant GH increase (peak: 5.2±3.2 ng/ml), which was comparable with that observed after the previous one. GH net incremental area under the curve after the first and second bouts of NMES were not significantly different (155.1±148.5 and 176.9±123.3 ng/ml per h, P=0.785).
Conclusions: Unlike repeated pharmacological stimuli and voluntary exercise bouts, subsequent sessions of NMES administered at a 2-h interval appear to circumvent feedback mechanisms and to re-induce the GH responses, thus indicating a possible different underlying mechanism elicited by different GH-releasing stimuli.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |