Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/eje.1.02341
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 156, Issue 3, 315-319
Copyright © 2007 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paisley, A N
Right arrow Articles by Trainer, P J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paisley, A N
Right arrow Articles by Trainer, P J

CLINICAL STUDY

Pegvisomant interference in GH assays results in underestimation of GH levels

A N Paisley, K Hayden2, A Ellis3, J Anderson1, G Wieringa1 and P J Trainer

Department of Endocrinology, Christie NHS Trust, Wilmslow Road, Withington, Manchester M20 4BX, UK, 1 Department of Biochemistry, Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK, 2 Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK and 3 UK NEQAS, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK

(Correspondence should be addressed to P J Trainer; Email: peter.trainer{at}man.ac.uk)

Introduction: Pegvisomant use in acromegaly negates the use of GH levels to monitor disease activity. To achieve antagonism, plasma concentrations must be ~1000-fold greater than GH which with the high homology between the peptides makes GH measurement a challenge when pegvisomant is present.

Objective: We investigated the effect of pegvisomant on GH measured using commercially available assays.

Methods: Pooled serum samples with GH concentrations <0.38, 3.85 and 7.69 µg/l were spiked with increasing pegvisomant concentrations (9000–494 000µg/l). Samples were analysed by the Nichols Advantage, DPC Immulite 2000, Diasorin IRMA, Beckman Access Dxl, Tosoh AIA and Wallac Delfia assays.

Results: With baseline GH <0.38 µg/l measured levels were <0.38 in all assays except Nichols, Diasorin and Beckman where GH peaked at 1.5, 9.6 and 17.7 µg/l respectively at low pegvisomant concentrations, falling thereafter. With the other two samples, measured GH levels progressively fell with increasing pegvisomant concentrations, except the Beckman assay where an increase (30.8 µg/l) was seen at a pegvisomant concentration of 9000 µg/l; and Diasorin and Tosoh where smaller increases were seen at lower pegvisomant concentrations, levels gradually falling thereafter.

Conclusion: The presence of pegvisomant resulted in artefactually low measured GH in most assays. We speculate this fall is due to assay antibody-binding pegvisomant, reducing the amount of available antibody to bind actual GH thereby producing less sandwich formation: the ‘high-dose hook’ effect. In most assays, this effect is modest and results in lower GH, but the level of interference makes them unsuitable for studies on the influence of pegvisomant on GH neuroregulation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
Endocrinology & Metabolism News, April 2007
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2007; 92(4): 17a - 17a.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 European Society of Endocrinology.