Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/eje.1.02151
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 154, Issue 6, 891-898
Copyright © 2006 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Vries, L.
Right arrow Articles by Phillip, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Vries, L.
Right arrow Articles by Phillip, M.

CLINICAL STUDY

Ultrasonographic and clinical parameters for early differentiation between precocious puberty and premature thelarche

Liat de Vries1,3, Gadi Horev2,3, Michael Schwartz2,3 and Moshe Phillip1,3

1 Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes, National Center for Childhood Diabetes and 2 Imaging Department, Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel, 14 Kaplan Street, Petah Tiqwa 49202, Israel and 3 Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

(Correspondence should be addressed to L de Vries; Email: liatd{at}clalit.org.il)

Objective: To determine if uterine and ovarian measurements can significantly distinguish between precocious puberty (PP) and premature thelarche (PT) and whether ultrasound has any advantage over the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulation test.

Design: Prospective.

Methods: One hundred and three girls referred consecutively for evaluation of breast budding before age 8 years underwent physical examination, GnRH stimulation test, bone age assessment, and transabdominal pelvic ultrasound. The diagnosis of PP or PT was based on clinical judgment. The clinical, laboratory, and ultrasound data of the PP and PT groups were compared.

Results: Eighty-one girls were diagnosed with PP and 22 with PT. Significant differences in most of the uterine and ovarian measurements were found between the groups. On logistic regression analysis, bone age standard deviation score, uterine transverse diameter, and uterine volume were the most significant variables predicting PP. Comparison of 30 girls with PP and 21 with PT in whom peak luteinizing hormone was <5 mIU/ml on the GnRH stimulation test, using analysis of variance, yielded significant differences in uterine width (P<0.001), fundus diameter (P <0.04), uterine volume (P= 0.006), and ovarian circumference (P <0.02).

Conclusions: Increased uterine and ovarian measurements may be an early and sensitive sign of PP. Pelvic ultrasound, a noninvasive, inexpensive, and reliable tool, may give the clinician a complementary indication to the GnRH test in distinguishing isolated PT from early-stage PP in girls with early breast budding.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
J.-C. Carel and J. Leger
Precocious Puberty
N. Engl. J. Med., May 29, 2008; 358(22): 2366 - 2377.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Ben-Haroush, H. Goldberg-Stern, M. Phillip, and L. de Vries
GnRH agonist treatment in girls with precocious puberty does not compromise post-pubertal uterine size
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 895 - 900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 European Society of Endocrinology.