Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/eje.1.01961
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 153, Issue 2, 203-205
Copyright © 2005 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drake, W M
Right arrow Articles by Monson, J P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drake, W M
Right arrow Articles by Monson, J P

CASE REPORT

Markers of cell proliferation in a GH-producing adenoma of a patient treated with pegvisomant

W M Drake1, D M Berney2, K Kovacs3 and J P Monson1

1 Departments of Endocrinology and 2 Histopathology, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK and 3 St Michael’s Hospital, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada

(Correspondence should be addressed to W M Drake; Email: w.m.drake{at}qmul.ac.uk)

Abstract

We report our findings on markers of cell proliferation (Ki-67 labelling index and topoisomerase-{alpha} expression) in a somatotroph pituitary tumour before and after exposure to pegvisomant, a GH receptor antagonist developed for the treatment of acromegaly. Specimens from two separate pituitary operations, separated by a period of 17 years that included 4 years of pegvisomant treatment, were stained for markers of cellular proliferation. Ki-67 labelling index and topoisomerase-{alpha} expression were both markedly greater (1–3% compared with 0–0.5% and 15–80% compared with 2–10% respectively) in the pegvisomant-exposed tumour compared with the earlier specimen. Clearly, caution must be exercised when interpreting findings from a single case, particularly one sufficiently refractory to conventional therapies to require treatment with pegvisomant. However, our data reinforce the requirement for careful radiological surveillance of the pituitary in the context of a drug that does not target the tumour responsible and where serum GH cannot serve as a marker of disease activity or tumour size.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 European Society of Endocrinology.