Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/eje.0.1490577
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 149, Issue 6, 577-582
Copyright © 2003 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geerdink, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lips, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Geerdink, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lips, C.

Articles

Do patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 1 benefit from periodical screening?

EA Geerdink, RB Van der Luijt, and CJ Lips

Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the benefit of periodical clinical screening of carriers of a mutation in the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) gene, because any useful discussion requires more concrete data. DESIGN AND METHODS: Our study population consisted of all the patients with MEN-1 (n=58) who were treated at the University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands, during the period 1975-2003, and their affected relatives (n=29). Records of affected individuals who died were analysed for morbidity, cause of death and age at death. We discuss our results in the light of the literature on MEN-1 regarding the benefit of screening. RESULTS: Over a period of 28 Years, we identified 87 individuals affected with MEN-1, from 16 families. A mutation in the MEN-1 gene was detected in 57%, 18% were obligate carriers, and in 24% the diagnosis was only clinically confirmed. Thirty individuals died, 17 from MEN-1-related causes, including malignancies (n=12: pancreatic islet cell tumours n=6 and carcinoid tumours n=6), the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (n=4) and Cushing's disease (n=1). The remaining patients died of causes probably related to MEN-1 (n=3), unrelated to MEN-1 (n=7) or of unknown causes. Mean ages at death from MEN-1 were 55.4 Years for men and 46.8 Years for women, in both cases significantly lower than the mean age at death in the average Dutch population (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We feel that the significantly increased risk of premature death found in patients with MEN-1 justifies the periodical clinical screening of carriers of the MEN-1 gene mutation. Early detection and treatment of abnormalities will probably reduce this risk.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
O Vierimaa, T M L Ebeling, S Kytola, R Bloigu, E Eloranta, J Salmi, E Korpi-Hyovalti, L Niskanen, A Orvola, E Elovaara, et al.
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 in Northern Finland; clinical features and genotype phenotype correlation
Eur. J. Endocrinol., September 1, 2007; 157(3): 285 - 294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
K. M A Dreijerink, A. P van Beek, E. G W M Lentjes, J. G Post, R. B van der Luijt, M. R C.-v. Dijk, and C. J M Lips
Acromegaly in a multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) family with low penetrance of the disease
Eur. J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2005; 153(6): 741 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 European Society of Endocrinology.