Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/eje.0.1410303
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 141, Issue 3, 303-312
Copyright © 1999 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lackey, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lackey, S.

Articles

Continuous s.c. infusion rather than twice-daily injections of IGF-I more effectively increases serum IGF binding protein-3 in female monkeys

ME Wilson and SL Lackey

Yerkes Primate Research Center, Emory University, 2409 Taylor Lane, Lawrenceville, GA 30043, USA. markw@rmy.emory.edu

OBJECTIVE: In order to better understand how the IGF-I axis is affected by exogenous IGF-I, this study compared the effects of a constant s.c. infusion of IGF-I with that of twice-daily injections of IGF-I in young adult female rhesus monkeys. Clinical studies suggest that circulating concentrations of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) are decreased or unaffected by IGF-I administration, whereas acute increases in IGF-I may increase serum IGFBP-1. However, studies in monkeys indicate that acute or continuous infusion of IGF-I effectively increases serum IGFBP-3. DESIGN AND METHODS: Female monkeys were studied for 5 days with no IGF-I supplementation (baseline) and for 5 days of IGF-I treatment by either constant infusion (120 microg/kg per day s.c., n = 5) or twice-daily injections of IGF-I (60 microg/kg per injection s.c., n = 5). Serum samples were collected daily at 0800 h and at 0800, 0900, 1100, 1500, and 2000 h on days 1 and 4 for each condition. Samples were assayed for IGF-I, IGFBPs-1 and -3, insulin, and glucose. RESULTS: Serum IGF-I was consistently increased above baseline within 24 h of the initiation of constant infusion, but was delayed until the second day of treatment in the injection group. Serum IGFBP-3 followed the pattern of IGF-I, with concentrations increased by day 1 during constant infusion and by day 2 during intermittent injections. Although both treatments effectively increased serum IGFBP-3, the increase was greater during constant infusion (31% above baseline) compared with injection (17%). Immunoblotting revealed that the constant infusion of IGF-I resulted in quantitatively more lower-molecular-mass fragments of IGFBP-3 than were observed during baseline or intermittent injections. Size-exclusion chromatography and ultrafiltration indicated that most IGFBP-3 was found in the ternary complex, with a greater percentage found in the ternary complex during baseline (90%) than during constant infusion (86%) or intermittent injections of IGF-I (87%). In contrast, serum concentrations of IGFBP-1 were increased on day 1 of both treatments, but declined towards baseline values as treatment progressed. Serum concentrations of insulin and glucose were unaffected by either mode of IGF-I treatment. Serum concentrations of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were increased within 3h of the injection, before declining towards the pre-injection level. In contrast, the daily pattern of serum hormone concentrations was similar between the baseline condition and during constant infusion of IGF-I. Although higher during the treatment phase, serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 concentrations decreased significantly from 0800 h until the afternoon meal, reaching a nadir in the evening before increasing again the next morning. Serum insulin decreased also after the morning meal and increased significantly immediately after the afternoon meal. Although serum IGFBP-1 also decreased initially after the morning meal, concentrations reached a peak before the afternoon meal as serum insulin reached its nadir. CONCLUSION: The results of the present analysis indicate that the constant infusion of IGF-I more effectively sustains serum concentrations of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 than do twice-daily injections. Although the percentage of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 in the ternary complex was similar during both treatments, the constant infusion regimen produced lower-molecular-mass fragments of IGFBP-3. In addition, serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 appeared to be regulated diurnally, even during IGF-I infusion, whereas IGFBP-1 and insulin were affected by the timing of food intake. Taken together, these data suggest that, in the monkey, IGFBP-3 is regulated by factors in addition to GH, and that IGF-I can affect its own bioavailability by increasing circulating concentrations of IGFBP-3.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. E. Wilson
Insulin-Like Growth Factor I (IGF-I) Replacement during Growth Hormone Receptor Antagonism Normalizes Serum IGF-Binding Protein-3 and Markers of Bone Formation in Ovariectomized Rhesus Monkeys
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2000; 85(4): 1557 - 1562.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 European Society of Endocrinology.