A comparison between octreotide-LAR and lanreotide-SR in the chronic treatment of acromegaly

Division of Endocrinology, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy. endonig@rdn.it

BACKGROUND: At present long-acting somatostatin analogs represent the first-line medical treatment of acromegaly. These drugs produce stable suppression of GH in most sensitive patients and IGF-I normalization in many; they also increase the compliance of acromegalic patients. The recent availability of octreotide (OC)-LAR, a somatostatin analog to be administered at 28-day intervals, has prompted us to compare, in the same group of patients, its effects and those of another somatostatin analog already available, lanreotide-SR (LSR, to be administered at 14-day intervals). PATIENTS: Twelve somatostatin analog-sensitive acromegalic patients with active disease were enrolled in a prospective open sequential study after giving their informed consent. After chronic treatment with LSR (6-24 months), the patients were changed to treatment with OC-LAR, without wash-out. LSR had been administered at individually tailored dosages (30 mg i.m. at 7-21-day intervals, median 10 days - every 7 days in seven patients, 10 days in two patients, 14 days in two patients and 21 days in one patient) according to GH and IGF-I responses. Disease stability was obtained, as shown by maximal GH/IGF-I suppression without any significant hormonal change between the last two control measurements. OC-LAR was administered i.m. at 28-day intervals six times at the dosage of 20 mg for the first three times and 10 or 30 mg for the last three times (according to individual GH/IGF-I responses). GH (mean of three, hourly samples) and IGF-I concentrations were evaluated on the same day as each administration of the drug, before its injection. RESULTS: GH and IGF-I values were significantly decreased by LSR treatment. GH decreased from 41.6 +/- 14.6 microg/l (mean +/- s.e.) to 7.2 +/- 1.5 microg/l (P < 0.02), whereas IGF-I values declined from 959 +/- 95 microg/l to 460 +/- 61 microg/l (P < 0.00001), expressed as absolute values, and from 287 +/- 30% to 137 +/- 19% expressed as percentage of the upper limit of normal range (% ULNR). At the end of the last cycle, OC-LAR treatment achieved a significant further suppression both in GH (to 5.1 +/- 1.1 microg/l, P < 0.05 compared with LSR) and in IGF-I concentrations (to 374 +/- 60 microg/l, P<0.05 compared with LSR, and to 112 +/- 19% as % ULNR). LSR decreased GH concentrations to less than 2.5 microg/l in one patient and normalized IGF-I concentrations in four patients. OC-LAR decreased GH concentrations to less than 2.5 microg/l in four patients and normalized or near-normalized IGF-I concentrations (i.e. to < 110% ULNR) in eight patients. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results show that the once-monthly OC-LAR administration schedule proved more efficacious than LSR given every 7-21 days, in a greater number of acromegalic patients.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. D. Murray and S. Melmed A Critical Analysis of Clinically Available Somatostatin Analog Formulations for Therapy of Acromegaly J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2008; 93(8): 2957 - 2968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. U. Freda, L. Katznelson, A. J. van der Lely, C. M. Reyes, S. Zhao, and D. Rabinowitz Long-Acting Somatostatin Analog Therapy of Acromegaly: A Meta-Analysis J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2005; 90(8): 4465 - 4473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Astruc, P. Marbach, H. Bouterfa, C. Denot, M. Safari, A. Vitaliti, and M. Sheppard Long-Acting Octreotide and Prolonged-Release Lanreotide Formulations Have Different Pharmacokinetic Profiles J. Clin. Pharmacol., July 1, 2005; 45(7): 836 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Kopchick, C. Parkinson, E. C. Stevens, and P. J. Trainer Growth Hormone Receptor Antagonists: Discovery, Development, and Use in Patients with Acromegaly Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2002; 23(5): 623 - 646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. U. Freda Somatostatin Analogs in Acromegaly J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2002; 87(7): 3013 - 3018. [Full Text] [PDF]