Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/eje.0.1410083
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 141, Issue 1, 83-89
Copyright © 1999 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Al-Gubory, K.
Right arrow Articles by Soulier, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Al-Gubory, K.
Right arrow Articles by Soulier, C

Articles

The secretory patterns of growth hormone in pregnant and hysterectomized ewes

KH Al-Gubory, P Bolifraud, G Kann, and C Soulier

INRA, Unite de Recherches de Physiologie Animale, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas cedex, France. algubory@jouy.inra.fr

This work was undertaken to determine the secretory patterns of GH during pregnancy, and to evaluate the effect, if any, of hysterectomy during early pregnancy on subsequent secretion of GH in ewes. The concentrations of GH were determined in the plasma of jugular blood samples collected at 15-min intervals during a 6-h period on days 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 and 120 post-mating, and three times per week between days 29 and 120 post-mating from 5 pregnant ewes and from 5 ewes from which the gravid uterus was removed on day 30 post-mating. A pulse analysis program (Pulsar) was used to analyse the secretory patterns of GH in individual profiles of the serial sampling period. In the two groups of ewes, peripheral concentrations of GH fluctuated in an episodic manner during the frequent blood sampling of any stage of the post-mating period examined. The overall GH concentrations, the basal GH concentrations, the frequency and the amplitude of GH pulses remained fairly stable between days 20 and 120 post-mating in the two groups of ewes. The parameters of GH secretion were not different between the two groups of ewes. The secretory patterns of GH, as determined in plasma of blood collected three times per week between days 29 and 120 post-mating were also not different between the two groups of ewes. In conclusion, results of this study show that (i) the pulsatile secretion of GH does not change as pregnancy advances, and (ii) hysterectomy performed during early pregnancy does not subsequently affect the secretory patterns of GH. These findings suggest that the gravid uterus and/or the feto-placental unit secretory products are unlikely to be involved in the control of GH secretion during pregnancy in the ewe.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 European Society of Endocrinology.