Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/eje.0.1360519
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 136, Issue 5, 519-530
Copyright © 1997 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Normolle, D. P
Right arrow Articles by Padmanabhan, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Normolle, D. P
Right arrow Articles by Padmanabhan, V.

A novel approach to assess changes in endocrine secretion: analysis of GnRH antagonist (Nal-Glu) suppression of gonadotropin release in ovariectomized ewes

Daniel P Normolle, Neil P Evans, Geoffrey E Dahl and Vasantha Padmanabhan

Circulating hormone levels reflect the outcome of multiple feedback systems. A method to accurately assess the dynamics of hormonal changes in samples collected at infrequent intervals and compare these dynamic processes among treatment groups is presented. In this approach, a smooth curve is fitted to each time series of concentrations produced in an experiment, the curves are summarized by numerical measurements, and the measurements are subjected to statistical analysis. The method is demonstrated on data from an experiment that explores the differential effects of a competitive GnRH receptor antagonist (Nal-Glu) on circulating levels of LH and FSH.

In this experiment, six adult ovariectomized Suffolk ewes were treated with one of three doses of Nal-Glu using a crossover design. LH and FSH concentrations were determined in hourly samples of jugular blood for 24 h after treatment. Applying the analytical approach, we observed differential effects of increasing concentrations of Nal-Glu on circulating LH and FSH concentrations. The magnitude of LH suppression was similar from dose to dose, while the duration of LH suppression was dose-dependent. In contrast, all doses of Nal-Glu elicited similar effects on the amplitude, duration and time to recovery of FSH suppression. Studies conducted in vitro utilizing dispersed ovine pituitary cells in culture demonstrated that the differential effects of Nal-Glu on FSH and LH secretion were not the outcome of differential sensitivity of FSH and LH to GnRH. The differential effects of Nal-Glu on circulating LH and FSH concentrations may be due to a number of factors, including other releasing or release-inhibiting hormones, paracrine modulators involved in selective regulation of FSH, and/or differences in clearances.

European Journal of Endocrinology 136 519–530







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 European Society of Endocrinology.